The Arithmetic of Influence
Why India’s Delimitation Debate Misses the Point The debate over expanding India's Parliament from 543 to a proposed 850 seats has become a flashpoint for a deeper, more uncomfortable question: does increasing the number of elected representatives actually strengthen democracy, or does it merely expand political patronage without improving accountability? Drawing on Mancur Olson's theory of collective action, this article argues that the logical remedy for India's governance challenges lies not in enlarging the Lok Sabha but in creating more states and devolving power to them. Smaller political units enable more perceptible contributions and greater accountability, while parliamentary expansion risks institutionalising the very dynamics that keep citizens passive and politicians powerful. The masses' embrace of the "more MPs" solution over genuine federal reform illustrates a tragic irony—the public buys into a dubious logic that ultimately serves organised ...