Skip to main content

How important is FDI for developing economies?

Is the quantum FDI very important? Is it the cause or the effect of economic development? Intuitively we know that it is important. The question is how important. The decision to invest in a particular country depends on several factors, including political situations, economic conditions, infrastructure, business growth, etc. Governments also play a significant role in attracting foreign investors by offering subsidies or tax concessions.

  • FDI allows the transfer of technology—particularly in the form of new varieties of capital inputs—that cannot be achieved through financial investments or trade in goods and services. FDI can also promote competition in the domestic input market.
  • Recipients of FDI often gain employee training while operating the new businesses, which contributes to human capital development in the host country.
  • Profits generated by FDI contribute to corporate tax revenues in the host country

However, if we look at two comparable economies (in terms of size), Bangladesh and Vietnam, they make you question the conventional wisdom. Both economies have been growing at a fast clip during the last 10 years. In 2022, Bangladesh's economy had grown to USD 460 billion whereas the Vietnamese economy had grown to USD 408 billion. Their recent trajectories compel a deeper dive.

The Bangladeshi economy overtook the Vietnamese economy in 2016 and has been powering ahead since then. It has been growing faster since 2012. Vietnam received USD 17.9 billion FDI in 2022 whereas Bangladesh received only USD 1.56 billion. That’s 8 times. Vietnam has consistently attracted FDI of the order of 4-5% of its GDP whereas Bangladesh gets barely 1-1.5% of its GDP, often less than 1%

The trends are as shown –


The one major difference is the population difference. Bangladesh is home to 170 million people whereas Vietnam has a population of 98 million. While this is significant, it will be odd to assume that this alone makes up for the difference in FDI. What are the other factors at play here?

Is FDI the cause or the effect of economic performance?

The extraordinary thing about Vietnam is its participation in international trade. Both exports and imports are over 80% of the GDP. Bangladesh on the other hand, is at a more normal level - Exports at about 15% of GDP and Imports at about 20% of GDP


As an economy, Bangladesh makes up somewhat for its lack of FDI with personal remittances. Although remittances to Vietnam are considerable, Bangladesh is higher by 60%. 






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tamil Nadu’s Economic and Social Journey (1950–2025): A Comparative Analysis with Future Horizons

Executive Summary Tamil Nadu has transformed from an agrarian economy in 1950 to India’s second-largest state economy by 2023–24, with a GSDP of ₹31 lakh crore and a per capita income (₹3,15,220) 1.71 times the national average. Its diversified economy—spanning automotive, textiles, electronics, IT, and sustainable agriculture—is underpinned by a 48.4% urbanization rate, 80.3% literacy, and a 6.5% poverty rate. Compared to Maharashtra, Gujarat, Karnataka, AP, and India, Tamil Nadu excels in social indicators (HDI: 0.708) and diversification, trailing Maharashtra in GSDP scale and Karnataka in IT dominance. Dravidian social reforms, the Green Revolution, post-1991 liberalization, and the 2021 Industrial Policy were pivotal. State budgets show opportunities in infrastructure and renewables but face constraints from welfare spending (40%) and debt (25% GSDP). Projected GSDP growth of 8–9% through 2025 hinges on electronics, IT, and green energy, leveraging strengths like a skilled workfor...

India’s Integrated Air Defense and Surveillance Ecosystem

India’s Integrated Air Defense and Surveillance Ecosystem: An Analysis with Comparisons to Israel and China India’s air defense and surveillance ecosystem, centered on the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS), integrates ground-based radars (e.g., Swordfish, Arudhra), Airborne Early Warning and Control (Netra AEW&C), AWACS (Phalcon), satellites (RISAT, GSAT), and emerging High-Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS) like ApusNeo. Managed by DRDO, BEL, and ISRO, it uses GaN-based radars, SATCOM, and software-defined radios for real-time threat detection and response. The IACCS fuses data via AFNET, supporting network-centric warfare. Compared to Israel’s compact, advanced C4I systems and China’s vast IADS with 30 AWACS, India’s six AWACS/AEW&C and indigenous focus lag in scale but excel in operational experience (e.g., Balakot 2019). Future plans include Netra Mk-1A/Mk-2, AWACS-India, and HAPS by 2030. Challenges include delays, limited fleet size, and foreign platform d...

Financial and Welfare Impact of a 30% U.S. Defense Budget Cut on NATO Member States: Implications for the EU, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain (2025–2030)

 Preamble This analysis aims to estimate the financial, economic, and social welfare impacts on NATO member states if the United States reduces its defense budget by 30% over the next five years (2025–2030) and expects other members to cover the resulting shortfalls in NATO’s common budget and future war-related expenditures. The focus is on the European Union (EU) as a whole and the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, assuming war spending patterns similar to those over the past 35 years (1989–2024), pro-rated for 2025–2030. The report quantifies the additional spending required, expresses it as a percentage of GDP, and evaluates the impact on Europe’s welfare economies, including potential shortfalls in social spending. It also identifies beneficiaries of the current NATO funding structure. By providing historical contributions, projected costs, and welfare implications, this report informs policymakers about the challenges of redistributing NATO’s financial resp...