A Chronicle of China's Soft Power Evolution and Western Rivalry

A Chronicle of China's Soft Power Evolution and Western Rivalry

 

China's soft power, defined by Joseph Nye as "the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercion or payments," has surged in the Global South since the early 2000s, propelled by economic diplomacy like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), cultural exports, and narratives of mutual benefit. In 2025, China ranks second in Brand Finance's Global Soft Power Index with a score of 72.8/100, trailing only the US, reflecting gains in technology, education, and sustainability perceptions. This rise contrasts with a perceptible decline in Western soft power, where US favorability has dropped to 50-60% in many regions from 70%+ a decade ago, per Pew and Gallup data. In Sub-Saharan Africa, China's favorability exceeds 60% (Afrobarometer 2025), driven by $182 billion BRI investments. The Middle East sees nascent gains through neutrality, like the 2023 Iran-Saudi deal. ASEAN experiences uneven progress amid South China Sea tensions, while Korea and Japan resist due to historical grievances. Latin America benefits from $130 billion BRI funds, exemplified by Peru's Chancay Megaport. US counter-strategies, including tariffs and security aid, aim to curb this, but China's pragmatic appeal endures. Over 2025-2030, expect multipolar hedging, with China leading economically but West stabilizing via values. Challenges like debt traps persist, yet Beijing's trajectory signals a rebalanced global order.

 

China's soft power journey, akin to a dragon awakening from slumber, began earnestly in the early 2000s under Hu Jintao, who emphasized cultural appeal and diplomacy to complement economic might. As Joseph Nye notes, "China has many soft power resources, and they are expanding," drawing from ancient civilization and modern innovation. By 2025, this strategy has yielded dividends: Brand Finance's Index shows China overtaking the UK, with strengths in "future growth potential" (1st globally) and "advanced in technology" (2nd). Expert David Haigh, Chairman of Brand Finance, attributes this to "China’s sustained efforts to enhance its economic attractiveness, showcase its culture, and boost its reputation as a safe and well-governed nation." Yet, Nye cautions, "As long as the government fans the flames of nationalism and holds tight the reins of party control, China’s soft power will remain limited."

Market-driven cultural exports have been pivotal, rebranding China from factory giant to creative force. Hits like the video game Black Myth: Wukong and viral creator Li Ziqi's idyllic videos have captivated global youth, generating emotional ties and revenue. As one analyst observes, "Market-oriented cultural exports drive China's rebranding," fostering authenticity over state propaganda. Educational diplomacy, via Confucius Institutes and scholarships (over 200,000 annually), builds networks, though Western closures highlight suspicions. In the words of Brookings' Jonathan Pollack, "Continuity and Change: China's Attitude toward Hard Power and Soft Power" underscores Beijing's blend of resources for influence. Media expansion, with CGTN in 70 countries, shapes narratives, as RUSI's Raffaello Pantucci notes, "Global Opinion Turns Against Beijing: A Failure of Soft Power?" amid polls showing declines in some areas.

The BRI, with $1.308 trillion invested since 2013 ($775 billion in construction, $533 billion non-financial), symbolizes "win-win" partnerships. Yet, challenges abound: geopolitical assertiveness fuels "sharp power" views, as Nye warns, "China's Soft and Sharp Power" risks overreaction from democracies. Domestic issues like censorship create credibility gaps, per CFR's Elizabeth Economy: "China's Big Bet on Soft Power" yields mixed returns.

In Sub-Saharan Africa, China's influence thrives on anti-colonial solidarity and $182 billion BRI loans, creating jobs and infrastructure. Favorability tops 60% (Afrobarometer 2025), outpacing US (53%). Expert Lina Benabdallah states, "China's Soft Power in Africa: It's About People-to-People Relations," highlighting exchanges like 80,000 scholarships. Media partnerships, per VOA's Yun Sun, amplify "win-win" tales, though debt concerns persist, as AidData's Bradley Parks notes: "Losing Hearts and Minds?: Unpacking the Effects of Chinese Soft Power." Africa's Center's Paul Nantulya adds, "Grand Strategy and China's Soft Power Push in Africa" leverages historical ties.

China's Soft Power in the Global South: An Assessment (2025) China's soft power in the Global South—encompassing South America (Latin America), Africa, Asia (Southeast, South, and Central subregions), and the Middle East—has seen robust development as of October 2025, driven by economic diplomacy, cultural exports, and strategic narratives of "win-win" cooperation and multipolarity. In the 2025 Global Soft Power Index by Brand Finance, China ranks second globally with a score of 72.8/100, excelling in pillars like Business & Trade (4th), Education & Science (3rd), and Future Growth Potential (1st), while lagging in Governance (43rd) and International Relations (29th). This reflects a strategic pivot toward market-oriented tools (e.g., viral cultural products like Black Myth: Wukong and Li Ziqi videos) and BRI infrastructure, which resonate in developing regions by emphasizing non-interference and shared development over Western conditional aid. Public opinion surveys show gains: A September 2025 Asia Society report notes mixed but improving perceptions, with favorability often exceeding 60% in the Global South, contrasted by declines in high-income nations. Projections for 2025 highlight China's use of the "Chinese model" (authoritarian efficiency) via BRI and cultural diplomacy to lead developing nations, though challenges like debt concerns and "sharp power" perceptions persist. Overall, China's influence is strongest in resource-rich, infrastructure-needy areas, outpacing the West in pragmatic appeal but struggling with authenticity and trust amid geopolitical tensions. South America (Latin America) China's soft power here is anchored in economic interdependence, with over $130 billion in BRI investments since 2000 creating nearly 1 million jobs and framing Beijing as a reliable partner. Key drivers include infrastructure (e.g., the $3.5 billion Chancay Megaport in Peru, operational in 2025, slashing trade times and boosting GDP by 1-2%) and commodity trade (e.g., 70% of Brazil's soy exports, 23% of Argentina's). Cultural tools like over 30 Confucius Institutes, film festivals, and scholarships (over 6,000 in Brazil via CELAC) foster elite networks and youth appeal. The May 2025 China-CELAC summit pledged $9 billion in investments and exchanges, emphasizing anti-colonial solidarity. Public opinion is modestly positive: Pew's July 2025 survey shows 52% favorability, up slightly, with higher rates in Brazil (55%) and Argentina (60%), driven by vaccine diplomacy and trade perks. In Mexico, favorability is lower (45%) due to U.S. proximity and USMCA ties. Challenges include "debt trap" accusations (e.g., in Ecuador, Venezuela) and environmental backlash, eroding trust in some cases. Projections indicate sustained growth via FDI and non-interference, appealing to historical U.S. hesitancy, potentially isolating Western interests by 2025. China competes effectively with the West by offering no-strings aid, though U.S. counter-strategies (e.g., tariffs, DFC funding) have slowed BRI signings by 25% in 2025. Overall, soft power is tangible, converting economic leverage into cultural affinity, but vulnerable to polarization. Africa (Sub-Saharan Africa) China's soft power is most pronounced in Africa, leveraging anti-colonial narratives and $182 billion in BRI loans since 2000 for infrastructure like railways and ports. As Africa's top trading partner for 14 years (trade at $300+ billion in 2024), China emphasizes mutual benefit via FOCAC, with the 2024 summit reaffirming scholarships for 80,000 students and zero-tariff policies. Cultural diplomacy includes 62 Confucius Institutes, journalist training (thousands annually), and media partnerships (e.g., CGTN Africa with 4.5 million followers, StarTimes in 30 countries). Party-to-party ties train 2,000 officials yearly on surveillance and poverty models, building elite loyalty. Public opinion is highly favorable: Afrobarometer 2025 ranks China as the most preferred power (60%+ approval), with Gallup noting an edge over the U.S.; favorability rose +10 points in South Africa. Challenges involve debt sustainability (e.g., in Zambia, Kenya) and perceptions of exploitation, fueling occasional protests. Projections for 2025 emphasize debt-trap leverage for concessions, with FDI integration enabling pressure for global support, positioning China as a superior model to Western aid. China dominates competition with the West, eroding U.S./EU influence amid perceived neglect (e.g., AGOA delays), though Western strengths in democracy promotion persist. Soft power is deeply embedded, blending economic tools with narratives to foster dependencies. Asia China's soft power in Asia's Global South varies by subregion, with strong economic ties offset by territorial disputes and balancing acts against India/Russia. Southeast Asia (ASEAN) In ASEAN, soft power is uneven but growing via $1 trillion+ BRI investments (e.g., high-speed rails in Indonesia, Laos). Cultural exports like Mixue bubble tea and Ne Zha 2 appeal to youth, while Confucius Institutes adapt amid sensitivities. China's 2025 SEANWFZ accession bolsters its "responsible power" image. Pew 2025 shows 67% favorability in Indonesia but low Xi confidence due to South China Sea tensions. Challenges: Debt concerns in Cambodia/Laos and coercion perceptions. Projections: BRI networks foster interdependency, enhancing soft power via non-interference. China fills U.S. voids but lags in trust against alliances. South Asia China's footprint has expanded rapidly post-2013 BRI, with trade at $100 billion (India), $27 billion (Bangladesh), $23 billion (Pakistan). Soft power tools include cultural diplomacy (e.g., Buddhist ties in Sri Lanka), education (scholarships, journalist awards in Pakistan), and media (e.g., X narratives in Sri Lanka). CPC party engagements and infrastructure (e.g., CPEC in Pakistan, Padma Bridge in Bangladesh) build influence. Perceptions are polarized: Negative in India (post-2020 border clashes), positive/neutral elsewhere (e.g., Nepal uses China to balance India; Bangladesh views favorably amid warnings against Quad). In Pakistan ("all-weather friend"), elite ties are stable but public questions CPEC benefits. Challenges: Opaque activities, backlash in Pakistan, limited success in objectives like Afghanistan mediation. Projections: Anti-India sentiment opens space, with potential trilateral cooperation (China-Pakistan-Bangladesh) tipping balances. China competes with India via investments, unsettling regional dynamics. Central Asia Economic influence dominates via BRI (e.g., trade parades in 2025 Beijing), with soft power focusing on cultural exchanges, education, and media to counter "misperceptions." In Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan (largest economies), adaptations include visa-free tourism and journalist training. 2025-2026 designated as high-quality cooperation years, with new agreements. Public opinion shows backlash: Anti-Chinese protests and legislation reflect fears of overreach. Challenges: Balancing with Russia, resource exhaustion from neighbor pressures. Projections: Evolving from hard to soft power, with BRI enabling hegemony amid minimal U.S. resistance. China leads over West/Russia in economic footprint. Middle East Soft power is nascent, focusing on economic pragmatism (e.g., BRI in Gulf energy) and neutrality (e.g., 2023 Iran-Saudi brokering). 27 Confucius Institutes promote language and festivals (e.g., UAE Chinese New Year). Perceptions vary: High in Saudi/UAE elites for reliability, but limited societal penetration due to cultural mismatches and Xinjiang wariness. Challenges: Debt and "aimless" narratives. Projections: BRI's Maritime Silk Road exploits U.S. fatigue, enhancing influence via cultural programs by 2025. China complements rather than displaces West, with edges in non-interference. Conclusion Across the Global South, China's soft power is thriving quantitatively (e.g., Index gains, high favorability in Africa/South Asia ex-India), leveraging BRI's $1+ trillion and cultural shifts to position as a multipolar leader. It competes strongly with the West by filling aid gaps and promoting non-interference, but faces hurdles like debt perceptions, backlashes (Central Asia), and polarized views (South Asia). Sustained success depends on organic growth over state control; otherwise, gains may plateau amid U.S. counters and regional agency.

The Middle East witnesses nascent progress through economic pragmatism and neutrality, brokering deals like Iran-Saudi 2023. Confucius Institutes (27 by 2025) promote culture, but cultural mismatches limit depth. As Belfer Center's Payam Mohseni observes, "Soft power remains a key tool for MENA diplomacy." Brookings' Sun Yun says, "China's Soft Power Strategy in the Middle East" complements military modernization. Favorability in Gulf elites reaches 60-70%, per surveys, though Xinjiang wariness lingers, as CSIS' Jon Alterman notes: "China's Soft Power in the Middle East."

ASEAN's patchwork reception stems from $1 trillion+ BRI investments, like Indonesia's rails, but SCS disputes erode trust. Pew 2025 shows 67% favorability in Indonesia but low Xi confidence. CSIS' Murray Hiebert states, "U.S. and Chinese Soft Power and Influence in Southeast Asia." In South Korea, favorability dips to 19%, per Pew, amid THAAD backlash; FP's Tobias Harris: "China Is Bad at Soft Power in Asia." Japan's 13% favorability reflects history, as NBR's report notes: "China's Soft Power in East Asia."

South and Central America's $130 billion BRI infusion, per CFR, fosters ties. Brazil's $150 billion trade, Argentina's soy surge (30% increase 2025), Mexico's $100 billion highlight dependencies. Chancay Port, $3.5 billion COSCO project, slashes trade times by 10-15 days, boosting Peru's GDP 1-2%. Expert Evan Ellis: "China's Growing Influence in Latin America." Diálogo Político's analysis: "China's Soft Power in Latin America." Favorability: Brazil 55%, Argentina 60%, Mexico 45% (Pew 2025).

US counter-strategies in Latin America, per CSIS, involve "insulate, curtail, and compete," with $15 billion DFC funding and tariffs. Brookings' Ryan Berg: "How are the United States and China intersecting in Latin America?" USIP's Mary Speck: "U.S. Needs to Invest More in Latin America to Counteract China." Atlantic Council's Jason Marczak: "How the United States can counter malign Chinese and Russian influence." BRI signings fell 25% in 2025.

Assessment of Western Soft Power in the Global South: Trends Over the Last Decade (2015–2025) China's soft power has risen in the Global South (Africa, Latin America, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East)—is well-supported by recent indices and polls, as evidenced by China's climb to 2nd place in the 2025 Global Soft Power Index (score: 72.8/100), with gains in perceptions of future growth, technology, and sustainability. This rise, driven by the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), cultural exports, and non-interference diplomacy, has coincided with a perceptible reduction in the collective West's (primarily the US, EU, UK, France, and Germany) soft power influence in these regions. While not a uniform collapse, the West's appeal has eroded or stagnated over the last 10 years, particularly in favorability ratings, perceptions of leadership, and cultural dominance. This shift is attributed to factors like perceived Western hypocrisy on issues such as democracy, trade protectionism, military interventions, and declining aid commitments, contrasted with China's pragmatic, investment-heavy approach. Data from polls (Pew Research, Gallup, Afrobarometer) and indices (Brand Finance Global Soft Power Index) show a relative decline: The US, for instance, has seen approval ratings drop in key Global South regions, while the EU maintains higher baseline favorability but faces stagnation amid migration tensions and economic critiques. Below is a region-by-region breakdown, drawing on trends from 2015 to 2025, followed by an overall evaluation. Africa (Sub-Saharan Africa) Western soft power has experienced a clear decline here, where China's favorability now often surpasses that of the US and EU. Gallup's 2024 analysis shows US approval slipping from 59% in 2022 to 56% in 2023 across the continent, losing its edge as the most influential power—a trend accelerating since 2015 when US ratings hovered around 70-80% in many countries. By 2025, Afrobarometer surveys indicate China as the most favored global power (over 60% approval in many nations), outpacing the US (down to around 50-55% from mid-2010s highs) and EU, amid perceptions of Western neglect (e.g., delays in AGOA trade renewals and conditional aid). EU favorability remains stable at around 60% but has not grown, reflecting critiques of colonial legacies and migration policies. In South Africa, US favorability dropped 10 points from 2024 to 2025 per Pew, while China's rose. Overall, the West's influence has perceptibly reduced, with China filling voids through BRI infrastructure and media partnerships. Latin America (South and Central America) The West's soft power shows stagnation with pockets of decline, particularly for the US, while the EU fares better but faces similar pressures. Pew's 2025 surveys indicate US favorability at around 50% median across the region (down from 60-70% in 2015), with drops in Brazil (from 61% in 2017 to 55% in 2025) and Mexico (from 66% in 2017 to 45-48% in 2025), driven by trade wars, migration policies, and perceived interference. In Argentina, US ratings improved slightly to 60-65% under pro-Western leadership in 2025, but overall regional trends show erosion since the mid-2010s. EU favorability holds at 62% median (stable from 2015-2020 levels), bolstered by trade agreements like EU-Mercosur, but declines in perceptions of reliability amid economic austerity demands. China's rise (favorability around 50-60%, up from 40% in 2015) via BRI projects like Peru's Chancay Port has highlighted Western shortcomings, leading to a relative reduction in influence. Not a drastic fall, but more a leveling off where it was higher a decade ago. Asia (South, Southeast, and Central Asia) This region exhibits the most varied but overall declining trends for Western soft power, exacerbated by geopolitical shifts. In Southeast Asia (ASEAN), Pew 2025 data shows US favorability at 50-60% (down from 70%+ in 2015 in countries like Indonesia and the Philippines), with low confidence in US leadership due to South China Sea tensions and trade protectionism. EU ratings are stable at 60%, but stagnant growth contrasts with China's 67% favorability in Indonesia (up from 50% in 2015). In South Asia, US favorability has dipped in India (from 66% in 2019 to around 50% in 2025 post-border clashes and Quad dynamics) and Pakistan (consistently low at 20-30%), while EU perceptions remain neutral but unchanged. Central Asia shows backlash against Western overreach, with US/EU favorability declining amid protests over resource deals (e.g., in Kazakhstan), dropping from mid-50s% in the mid-2010s to low 40s% by 2025. Overall, a perceptible reduction, with East Asia-specific studies noting US declines tied to COVID-19 responses and protectionism. Middle East Western soft power has eroded significantly, though the EU performs better than the US. Pew's 2025 surveys show US favorability at low levels (e.g., 30-40% in many Arab countries, down from 50% in 2015), influenced by post-Afghanistan withdrawal perceptions and ongoing conflicts like Gaza, where US support for Israel has alienated publics. In the Gulf (Saudi Arabia, UAE), US ratings dipped post-2021 but stabilized at 50-60% due to security ties, while EU favorability holds at 60% (stable but not growing, per Arab Barometer trends). China's neutral broker role (e.g., 2023 Iran-Saudi deal) has boosted its appeal to 50-70%, highlighting Western declines tied to "hegemony" critiques. A clear reduction from mid-2010s levels. Overall Evaluation and Comparison There is a perceptible reduction in the collective West's soft power in the Global South over the last 10 years, rather than stability at prior levels. In the 2025 Global Soft Power Index, the US remains 1st (79.5/100) but stagnated, with declines in reputation (down 4 to 15th), governance (down 4 to 10th), and people/values (down 10 to 36th); the UK fell to 3rd, overtaken by China; France and Germany are not top-ranked but show similar stagnation in broader perceptions. Gallup and Pew data confirm US global favorability dropping from 60-70% medians in 2015 to 50% in 2025 across surveyed Global South countries, with EU at a stable but unadvancing 62%. This erosion is most acute in Africa and the Middle East, moderate in Asia and Latin America, and amplified by China's gains (e.g., from 40-50% favorability in 2015 to 60%+ in 2025). Commentaries describe this as a "dramatic decline" for the US over the decade, driven by internal polarization, foreign policy missteps (e.g., Afghanistan, Ukraine aid inconsistencies), and economic protectionism, while the EU's image suffers from migration hardlines. It's not "more or less where it was"—the West's lead has narrowed, with potential for further reduction if trends like US isolationism persist.

Overall in Global South, China's robust gains—Pew median 36% favorability globally, higher in South (60%)—contrast Western decline: US from 70%+ to 50-60% (Pew/Gallup). Stimson's Akriti Vasudeva: "Red Cell: Is the West losing the Global South?" Friends of Europe's Shada Islam: "Soft power suicide: America gives up the battle." China Daily's op-ed: "The decline of the Western model and the rise of the Global South."

For 2025-2030, CKGSB's forecast: "China and the Rise of the Global South Economy in 2025" predicts BRI exceeding $2 trillion, trade at $2 trillion annually. Carnegie: "U.S.-China Relations for the 2030s" envisions coexistence. AidData's report: "BRI at 10" shows 79% leaders view Beijing supportively. UI's brief: "What is China's message to the Global South?" highlights solidarity. Asia Society: "Public Opinion Surveys Show Recent Gains for China's Soft Power." Diplomat's Ankit Panda: "Before the US Realizes the Cost, China Is Rapidly Gaining Soft Power Ground." Dino Patti Djalal: "Why the Global South Won't Give Up on China." Eurasia Review: "China Advances To Second Place In Global Soft Power Ranking."

Realistic Expectations for China-West Dynamics in the Global South Over the next five years, the competition between China and the collective West (primarily the US and EU) in the Global South—encompassing Africa, Latin America, South and Southeast Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East—will likely evolve into a more entrenched multipolar landscape, characterized by pragmatic hedging by Global South nations rather than outright alignment with either side. China's economic momentum, fueled by the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and trade surpluses, will continue to expand its footprint, with Global South trade projected to grow at 5.9% annually, reaching over $2 trillion by 2030 and comprising more than 60% of China's total exports (up from 50% in 2025). However, Beijing's influence will face headwinds from domestic economic rebalancing needs, debt sustainability concerns, and overcapacity issues, limiting soft power gains to incremental rather than transformative levels. The West, meanwhile, will pursue targeted counter-strategies—US-led tariffs and securitization, EU-focused green tech and trade diversification—aiming to stabilize or partially recover influence, but without recapturing pre-2015 dominance. Expect a "coopetition" dynamic: collaboration on shared challenges like climate and supply chains, amid rivalry in resources and narratives. Global South agency will be key, with emerging powers (e.g., India, Brazil, South Africa) leveraging both sides for maximum benefit, fostering a fragmented rather than binary order. This outlook draws from recent forecasts, including China's 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030), which prioritizes "high-quality" BRI development and Global South partnerships, and Western analyses emphasizing coexistence amid rivalry. Below, I break it down by key dimensions, with region-specific nuances. Economic Influence: China's Volume Lead Persists, West Gains in Quality China's economic edge will solidify, but not without vulnerabilities. By 2030, BRI investments in the Global South could exceed $2 trillion cumulatively, focusing on digital infrastructure, renewables, and critical minerals (e.g., lithium in Latin America, cobalt in Africa), positioning Beijing as the default financier for infrastructure gaps. Trade imbalances will widen: China's exports to the region are already 50% higher than to the US/EU combined ($1.6T vs. $1T in 2025), with projections for sustained surpluses in commodities like soy from Brazil/Argentina and rare earths from Africa. However, challenges loom—trade tensions with emerging markets (e.g., India's tariffs on Chinese EVs) and Beijing's need to rebalance its economy (e.g., boosting domestic consumption) could slow FDI growth to 3-4% annually, per Chatham House scenarios. The West's counterplay will emphasize "de-risking" and selective engagement. The US, under ongoing tariff regimes (potentially 60% on Chinese goods by 2027), will accelerate nearshoring via frameworks like the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), aiming to divert 20-30% of Global South supply chains away from China by 2030. EU strategies will target cleantech dominance, with €300 billion in Global Gateway investments (2021–2027 extension) to displace Chinese solar panels and batteries in Africa and Asia, potentially capturing 25% market share in green exports. Success metrics: US/EU combined FDI in the region could rise 15-20% from 2025 levels, focusing on high-value sectors like semiconductors in Vietnam and EVs in Morocco. Yet, protectionism risks alienating partners, as seen in 2025 backlash to US port fees on Chinese shipments. Africa: China's trade dominance (top partner for 40+ countries) grows to $400B by 2030, but debt restructurings (e.g., Zambia model) cap new loans at $50B annually. West counters via EU's €150B Africa-EU Green Deal, stabilizing influence in North Africa. Latin America: China absorbs 30% of exports (up from 25%), but US nearshoring booms Mexico's maquiladoras, with FDI tripling to $100B. EU-Mercosur deals reduce China dependency by 10-15%. Asia (South/Southeast/Central): CPEC-like corridors expand, but US IPEF and EU-India FTA dilute China's 40% regional trade share. Central Asia sees balanced Russia-China-West energy plays. Middle East: China's oil imports from Gulf states hit 50% of total, but US/EU security pacts (e.g., Abraham Accords 2.0) retain leverage in tech transfers. Soft Power and Narratives: Incremental Chinese Gains, Western Stabilization China's soft power investments—estimated at $10B annually—will yield modest returns, with favorability rising 5-10 points in polls (to 60-70% medians) via cultural exports (e.g., TikTok trends, Confucius Institutes rebranded as "cultural hubs") and education (1M+ Global South scholarships by 2030). Success in Africa and Latin America (e.g., via FOCAC/CELAC summits) will embed the "Chinese model" of state-led development, but Asia/Middle East skepticism persists due to territorial frictions and Xinjiang perceptions. Erosion of trust from economic headwinds (e.g., youth unemployment spillover) could cap gains, as noted in Asia Society's 2025 forecast. The West will counter through values-based diplomacy and tech alliances, aiming to hold steady at 50-60% favorability. US initiatives like the Summit for Democracy (biannual from 2026) and EU's "Global Europe" narrative will highlight governance and human rights, regaining ground in urban elites. Digital soft power—Hollywood reboots, K-pop/EU festivals—could offset China's media push (e.g., CGTN expansions). Projections: Western cultural exports grow 10% via platforms like Netflix in Africa, narrowing the gap in youth perceptions. Africa: China leads narratives (70%+ approval), but EU vocational training (500K slots) boosts Western appeal in skills gaps. Latin America: Balanced; China's vaccine legacy fades, US cultural ties (e.g., via OAS) stabilize at 55%. Asia: China's edge in Southeast (65%) challenged by US alliances (Quad+); South Asia hedges via India-West pacts. Middle East: Neutrality favors China (60%), but EU cultural diplomacy (e.g., Goethe Institutes) holds 55-60%. Geopolitical and Security Dynamics: Hedging and Selective Alignment Geopolitics will see increased multipolarity, with Global South nations like Brazil and Saudi Arabia mediating US-China tensions (e.g., via BRICS, now 46% of global GDP). China's military footprint grows modestly—overseas bases in Djibouti, ports in Pakistan/Pakistan— but focuses on "protective" roles (e.g., anti-piracy), avoiding direct challenges. By 2030, 20-25 Global South countries may join China's Global Security Initiative, per NIDS projections. Western responses will securitize partnerships: US doubles security aid to $20B annually (e.g., AUKUS extensions to Africa), framing China as an enabler of instability (e.g., via cartels in Latin America). EU's "Strategic Compass" evolves into joint missions, countering BRI "dual-use" infrastructure. Carnegie scenarios suggest "managed coexistence" by 2030, with trilateral dialogues (US-China-EU) on issues like AI governance, reducing escalation risks. However, flashpoints—South China Sea, Taiwan—could polarize, pushing 10-15% of Global South toward West if conflicts erupt. Africa/Middle East: China gains in resource security; West leads counterterrorism alliances. Latin America/Asia: US naval presence (e.g., in Panama Canal) checks Chinese ports; EU mediation in disputes. Risks and Uncertainties Upside for China: If 15th FYP succeeds in rebalancing (e.g., RMB internationalization to 10% Global South trade), influence surges 20%. Downside: Domestic slowdowns (growth <4%) or debt crises erode credibility. For West: Coordinated US-EU strategies could reclaim 10-15% market share; disunity (e.g., Trump-era isolationism) accelerates losses. Global Shocks: Climate events or pandemics favor China's rapid aid model; recessions boost Western recovery narratives. In summary, expect China to maintain economic primacy (60%+ of infrastructure financing) while the West stabilizes at 40-50% influence through niche strengths like tech and security. The Global South's hedging will prevent dominance by either, fostering a "third way" via forums like G77+China. This realistic trajectory aligns with Carnegie’s 2030s coexistence scenario: rivalry without rupture, where mutual dependencies temper zero-sum outcomes.

 

Reflection

As the dragon's shadow lengthens across the Global South, China's soft power ascent heralds a seismic shift in global dynamics, challenging Western hegemony while exposing fissures in both camps. This narrative, woven from economic threads like BRI's trillions and cultural tapestries of games and institutes, underscores Beijing's adept navigation of multipolarity. Yet, as Nye astutely observes, "Soft power is the ability to get what you want through attraction," and China's gains, while impressive, are tempered by sharp power perceptions and internal contradictions. The West's decline, from post-colonial baggage to inconsistent aid, as per Stimson's analysis, risks ceding ground unless revitalized through genuine partnerships. In Africa, where China leads favorability, and Latin America, via hubs like Chancay, the allure of "win-win" resonates amid Western stagnation. But debt traps and environmental tolls, as in Peru's wetland degradation, demand scrutiny. Asia's resistance, from Japan's historical scars to ASEAN's maritime fears, highlights limits, echoing FP's view: "China Is Bad at Soft Power in Asia." Looking ahead, 2025-2030 projections suggest coopetition: China's renewable push and trade dominance versus Western tech alliances. Carnegie envisions "managed coexistence," but risks like US tariffs could polarize. Ultimately, the Global South's agency—hedging via BRICS—will define outcomes, fostering a "third way" beyond binaries. As Nye reflects, "Power is like the weather. Everyone depends on it and talks about it, but few understand it." For sustainability, China must embrace organic appeal over control, and the West, moral consistency over coercion. This rivalry could catalyze progress if channeled toward shared challenges like climate, or devolve into fragmentation. The dragon's charm, while captivating, reminds us: true power lies in mutual elevation, not domination.

References: All citations drawn from Pew Research Center (2025 surveys), Brand Finance Global Soft Power Index 2025, Afrobarometer (2025), AidData BRI reports, CFR backgrounds, Brookings articles, and expert analyses from Nye, Haigh, et al.

Brand Finance. (2025). Global Soft Power Index 2025. Retrieved from [Brand Finance website].

Pew Research Center. (2025). Global Attitudes Survey 2025: Views on China and the United States in the Global South. Retrieved from [Pew Research website].

Pollack, J. (2016). Continuity and Change: China's Attitude toward Hard Power and Soft Power. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from [Brookings website].

Economy, E. (2018). China’s Big Bet on Soft Power. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from [CFR website].

Pantucci, R. (2022). Global Opinion Turns Against Beijing: A Failure of Soft Power? Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). Retrieved from [RUSI website].

Benabdallah, L. (2020). China’s Soft Power in Africa: It’s About People-to-People Relations. The Diplomat. Retrieved from [The Diplomat website].

Sun, Y. (2021). China’s Soft Power Strategy in the Middle East. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from [Brookings website].

Mohseni, P. (2023). Soft Power as a Tool in Middle East Diplomacy. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Retrieved from [Belfer Center website].

Alterman, J. (2022). China’s Soft Power in the Middle East. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Retrieved from [CSIS website].

Afrobarometer. (2025). Public Opinion on Foreign Powers in Africa. Retrieved from [Afrobarometer website].

Hiebert, M. (2023). U.S. and Chinese Soft Power and Influence in Southeast Asia. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Retrieved from [CSIS website].

Harris, T. (2022). China Is Bad at Soft Power in Asia. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from [Foreign Policy website].

National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR). (2021). China’s Soft Power in East Asia. Retrieved from [NBR website].

Ellis, E. (2023). China’s Growing Influence in Latin America. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Retrieved from [CSIS website].

Diálogo Político. (2022). China’s Soft Power in Latin America. Retrieved from [Diálogo Político website].

AidData. (2023). Losing Hearts and Minds?: Unpacking the Effects of Chinese Soft Power. Retrieved from [AidData website].

Nantulya, P. (2021). Grand Strategy and China’s Soft Power Push in Africa. Africa Center for Strategic Studies. Retrieved from [Africa Center website].

Vasudeva, A. (2024). Red Cell: Is the West Losing the Global South? Stimson Center. Retrieved from [Stimson website].

Islam, S. (2023). Soft Power Suicide: America Gives Up the Battle. Friends of Europe. Retrieved from [Friends of Europe website].

China Daily. (2024). The Decline of the Western Model and the Rise of the Global South. Retrieved from [China Daily website].

Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business (CKGSB). (2025). China and the Rise of the Global South Economy in 2025. Retrieved from [CKGSB website].

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2023). U.S.-China Relations for the 2030s. Retrieved from [Carnegie website].

Asia Society. (2025). Public Opinion Surveys Show Recent Gains for China’s Soft Power. Retrieved from [Asia Society website].

Panda, A. (2024). Before the US Realizes the Cost, China Is Rapidly Gaining Soft Power Ground. The Diplomat. Retrieved from [The Diplomat website].

Djalal, D. P. (2024). Why the Global South Won’t Give Up on China. Retrieved from [personal publication or think tank website].

Eurasia Review. (2025). China Advances To Second Place In Global Soft Power Ranking. Retrieved from [Eurasia Review website].

Uppsala Institute (UI). (2024). What is China’s Message to the Global South? Retrieved from [UI website].

Berg, R. (2023). How are the United States and China Intersecting in Latin America? Brookings Institution. Retrieved from [Brookings website].

Speck, M. (2023). U.S. Needs to Invest More in Latin America to Counteract China. United States Institute of Peace (USIP). Retrieved from [USIP website].

Marczak, J. (2023). How the United States Can Counter Malign Chinese and Russian Influence. Atlantic Council. Retrieved from [Atlantic Council website].

AidData. (2023). Belt and Road at 10: Maximizing the Impact of Chinese Global Infrastructure. Retrieved from [AidData website].

Nye, J. S. (2018). China’s Soft and Sharp Power. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from [Project Syndicate website].

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). (2024). China’s Belt and Road: Implications for Latin America. Retrieved from [CFR website].

Pew Research Center. (2017). Global Indicators Database: Historical Data on U.S. and China Favorability. Retrieved from [Pew Research website].

Gallup. (2024). World Leadership Report: U.S. vs. China in the Global South. Retrieved from [Gallup website].

Arab Barometer. (2024). Public Opinion in the Middle East and North Africa. Retrieved from [Arab Barometer website].

National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS). (2023). China’s Global Security Initiative and Its Implications. Retrieved from [NIDS website].

Chatham House. (2024). China’s Economic Rebalancing and Global South Trade. Retrieved from [Chatham House website].