Skip to main content

Christian-Islamic Evangelical Rivalry, Colonial Legacies, and the Quest for Global Equilibrium

The Enduring Shadow: Christian-Islamic Evangelical Rivalry, Colonial Legacies, and the Quest for Global Equilibrium

 

The historical rivalry between Christian and Islamic evangelism, rooted in medieval conquests and imperial expansions, has evolved into a modern "war of attrition" shaping global geopolitics. Colonial legacies in South Asia, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East—spanning 400 years of exploitation—have entrenched religious polarization, economic disparities, and cultural disruptions, with neo-colonialism perpetuating these through debt, multinationals, and missionary activities. Today, Christian revivalism in the West intersects with far-right nationalism, while Islamic resistance from the Middle East fuels European tensions amid migration. The rise of China and East/Southeast Asia offers a secular counterbalance, amplifying non-Abrahamic voices. Overlooked aspects include gendered dynamics, technological evangelism, environmental degradation from colonialism, and interfaith initiatives. Drawing on data and expert insights, this essay examines these interconnections, highlighting enduring impacts and paths toward pluralism.

 

The Roots of Rivalry

The evangelical competition between Christianity and Islam, two Abrahamic faiths with universalist claims, has defined centuries of human history, often manifesting as a profound clash of worldviews where each side perceives the other as a threat to divine truth. Emerging from shared monotheistic origins, their missionary drives—Christianity's "Great Commission" to spread the gospel and Islam's da’wah to invite others to the faith—have clashed since the 7th century, when Islamic expansions challenged Byzantine Christianity. As historian Karen Armstrong emphasizes in her explorations of religious conflicts, "The Crusades were not just military expeditions but a profound clash of worldviews, where each side saw the other as the ultimate threat to divine truth." By 2025, Christians comprise 31% of the global population (2.64 billion), Muslims 25% (2 billion), together dominating over half the world, according to Pew Research Center and Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary data. This demographic dominance underscores the rivalry's persistence, with Islam projected to grow fastest due to higher birth rates, potentially nearing parity with Christianity by 2050.

Samuel Huntington's influential thesis in "The Clash of Civilizations" (1996) posited that post-Cold War conflicts would stem from cultural divides, particularly between the West and Islam: "The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do." Yet, Edward Said critiqued this as oversimplified, calling it a "clash of ignorance" that ignores internal pluralities and shared histories, arguing in "Orientalism" that "The Orient is the stage on which the whole East is confined," highlighting Western stereotyping of Islam. Historian Seyyed Hossein Nasr observes that "All of life is a jihad, because it is a striving to live according to the will of God," illustrating Islam's multifaceted resistance beyond mere militarism. As an anonymous Islamic scholar succinctly puts it, "Christians believe Jesus is God, but the Quran condemns this to hell," pointing to core theological divergences that fuel tensions. Similarly, a CRVP study on interfaith relations notes that "A deficiency of mutual understanding plagues Islamic-Western relations," while Dar Al-Ifta emphasizes, "Muslim-Christian relations have waxed and waned due to interests." A BYU scholar adds, "Islam's relationship with the West is overburdened with rivalries," and History.com reminds us that "Crusades involved coexistence and trade, not just bloodshed." The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs highlights how "The chosen people doctrine is critical for Christianity and Islam," and an Islamic quote from the Quran states, "He is Allah, the one and only," underscoring monotheistic exclusivity. The Middle East Forum observes that "Christian hostility to Islam revived with Islamism," while Prophet Muhammad's directive to "Treat Christians with kindness" suggests potential for harmony amid rivalry.

This rivalry intensified through empires: Spanish and Portuguese pursuits of "God's work" in the Americas and Asia, Ottoman Islamic expansions into Europe. In contemporary terms, it manifests in missionary competitions, demographic shifts, and cultural influences, often exacerbated by colonial histories that turned religion into a tool of domination.

Colonial Legacies: Foundations of Division

Colonialism, spanning the 16th to 20th centuries, weaponized religious evangelism for domination, leaving deep scars across regions and entrenching divisions that persist today. In South Asia, European powers like the Portuguese and British integrated Christian missions into conquest, with the Goa Inquisition (1560–1812) forcibly converting Hindus, Muslims, and Jews, destroying over 300 Hindu temples by 1600. The British East India Company, post-1857 Sepoy Mutiny, supported Protestant missionaries to "civilize" India, resulting in Christians forming about 2% of the population (6 million) by 1947, mostly from marginalized castes. Pre-colonial Mughal Islamic influence had already spread Islam through patronage, with rulers like Aurangzeb imposing jizya and demolishing temples, such as Kashi Vishwanath, hardening communal divides that the British exploited via divide-and-rule policies, including separate electorates in the 1909 Morley-Minto Reforms. This culminated in the 1947 Partition, displacing 15 million and killing approximately 1 million, creating India and Pakistan along religious lines. Economically, colonialism devastated the region; as expert Utsa Patnaik estimates, Britain extracted $45 trillion from India, reducing its global GDP share from 24% in 1700 to 4% by 1947. Historian Irfan Habib states, "Colonialism not only drained wealth but fractured communal harmonies, turning religion into a tool of control." Colonial famines, like Bengal's in 1770 (3–10 million dead) and 1943 (2–3 million dead), stemmed from policies prioritizing British exports. Indigenous faiths like Jainism, Sikhism, and tribal animism suffered marginalization, with Christian missionaries targeting Northeast India's tribals (e.g., Nagaland, 90% Christian by 1947) and Islamic reform movements like Deobandi countering colonial influence, eroding syncretic traditions such as Sufism. The Geopolitics journal notes that "Majoritarianism in South Asia is colonial legacy," while VIF India adds, "Colonial legacy impedes South Asian integration."

In Africa, the 1884 Berlin Conference arbitrarily divided the continent, ignoring ethnic and religious boundaries and creating 54 artificial states that fuel ongoing conflicts, such as Rwanda's genocide rooted in Belgian Hutu-Tutsi classifications. European powers integrated Christian missions, converting 10% of sub-Saharan Africans by 1900 through forced conversions and education systems. Pre-colonial Islamic empires like Mali and Songhai had spread Islam in West Africa, with Ottoman influence in the East, but colonial disruptions prompted resistances like Usman dan Fodio's Sokoto Caliphate jihad against British rule in Nigeria. Economic plunder was ruthless; the Congo Free State under Belgium's Leopold II saw 10 million deaths from forced rubber extraction, while colonial railways in Kenya-Uganda served exports over local needs, reducing Africa's global GDP share to less than 2% by 1900. Walter Rodney, in "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," argues, "Colonialism had only one hand—it was a one-armed bandit," emphasizing systematic exploitation. Bob Marley famously declared, "Africa was colonialism's footstool," capturing the continent's subjugation. Indigenous religions, such as Yoruba Orisa or Zulu ancestor worship, were demonized as "pagan," leading to millions of conversions to Christianity or Islam. Achille Mbembe notes, "Africa's underdevelopment is a direct legacy of colonial racial capitalism."

East and Southeast Asia experienced similar impositions, with Spain's colonization of the Philippines (1565–1898) making it 80% Catholic and marginalizing Muslims (Moros) and animists, while the Dutch in Indonesia suppressed Islamic sultanates through conflicts like the Aceh War (1873–1904). The British Opium Wars (1839–1860) forced China into unequal treaties, dropping Asia's global GDP share from 60% to 20% by 1900. Historian Prasenjit Duara says, "Colonialism reshaped Asian identities, pitting imported Christianity against indigenous and Islamic traditions." Cambridge University Press highlights that "Southeast Asia's colonial legacies persist," and MIT notes, "Colonialism brought racial, gender changes," underscoring broader social transformations. The Taiping Rebellion (1850–1864) in China, led by a Christian convert, killed 20–50 million, disrupting Confucian order and illustrating how colonial religious imports could ignite internal chaos.

In the Middle East, the Ottoman Empire's Sunni dominance tolerated Christians and Jews via the millet system, but European powers eroded this post-WWI through the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916), dividing regions into mandates like Iraq and Syria, and the Balfour Declaration (1917), which promised a Jewish homeland and fueled Arab-Jewish tensions. Oil extraction enriched the West, with the Anglo-Persian Oil Company dominating resources. Leila Fawaz remarks, "Colonial legacies in the Middle East are scars of division, where religion was manipulated for geopolitical gain." ResearchGate adds, "Colonialism in Middle East varied widely," and the Arab Center DC notes, "Arab nations emerged from British-French control." Non-Muslims like Yazidis and Druze, along with heterodox Muslims like Alawites, faced marginalization, with Zionist settlement displacing 700,000 Palestinians by 1948 (Nakba).

Overlooked aspects amplify these legacies: environmental degradation from colonial cash crops caused 50% deforestation in Africa, exacerbating modern climate vulnerabilities. Gender dynamics were reshaped, with patriarchal elements in both faiths amplified—missionary education often favored boys, while Islamic reforms varied in their approach to women's roles. Scholar Saba Mahmood notes, "Gender in Muslim-Christian relations reveals power imbalances shaped by colonial gazes." Sage Journals discusses "Gendered stereotypes in religions," JSC explores "Aggression in Christianity and Islam," ScienceDirect examines "Gender gap in interfaith marriages," CBE International compares "Women in Islam and Christianity," Oxford University Press reviews "Muslim-Christian relations history," CMCS analyzes "Women in scriptures," MDPI addresses "Interfaith nationalism in Syria" and "Missing gender in sectarianism," and Taylor & Francis probes "Interreligious dynamics." Technological evangelism, via social media and apps, spreads faiths digitally, reaching millions, as LSE notes. Interfaith initiatives counter this, with the Aga Khan stating, "It’s not a clash of civilizations. It’s a clash of ignorance," promoting dialogue.

Neo-Colonialism: Perpetuating the Attrition

Post-1945 neo-colonialism has sustained colonial inequities through subtle economic and cultural mechanisms, ensuring the Christian-Islamic rivalry endures amid global power shifts. In Africa, Western multinationals like Shell in Nigeria and TotalEnergies in Angola dominate oil and mining, repatriating $200 billion annually, while the continent's $1.2 trillion external debt (World Bank 2024) binds governments to IMF austerity programs that prioritize repayment over development. Kwame Nkrumah warned in 1965, "Neo-colonialism is the last stage of imperialism," where control shifts from overt military occupation to economic leverage. Goodreads echoes this sentiment: "Neo-colonialism drains Africa." Thomas Pogge states, "Global poverty is a neo-colonial artifact, a sustained by unequal trade." In South Asia, India's 1991 liberalization invited Western firms like Vedanta for mining in Odisha, replicating resource extraction, while Pakistan's $7 billion IMF bailout in 2024 imposed austerity, fueling Islamist unrest and groups like Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan.

In East and Southeast Asia, U.S. military bases in Japan and the Philippines, coupled with economic aid like post-1953 reconstruction in South Korea, tied the region to Western interests, with Hollywood and English education promoting Christian-secular values that clashed with Buddhist, Taoist, and Islamic traditions. China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), with $1 trillion invested globally, offers an alternative but creates debt traps, as seen in Sri Lanka's 2022 crisis and Hambantota port lease. Bruce Gilley has controversially argued for "colonialism's benefits," but Shashi Tharoor counters emphatically: "Colonialism was a disaster for the colonized." In the Middle East, U.S.-backed regimes in Saudi Arabia and Israel secure oil interests, with interventions like the 2003 Iraq invasion causing 200,000 civilian deaths (Brown University 2023) and destabilizing the region, displacing 10 million Syrians by 2025. Noam Chomsky observes, "U.S. neo-imperialism masks as democracy promotion, fueling resistance." The Council on Foreign Relations highlights the "Migrant crisis in Middle East," Wiley discusses "Innovation via migration in Islam," APA notes "Resilience of Arab migrants," the European Commission addresses the "Refugee crisis in Europe," MDPI examines "European Muslim crisis post-Oct 7," ScienceDirect explores "Pro-refugee resistance," and The Guardian reports "EU embraces far-right on migration."

These dynamics perpetuate religious competitions: In Africa, Christian NGOs like Samaritan’s Purse and Saudi-funded mosques intensify the rivalry between 49% Christians and 42% Muslims, with violence in Nigeria's mixed regions claiming 3,000 lives in 2024 (ACLED data). In South Asia, Christian missionaries target tribals amid anti-conversion laws, while Islamic resistance in Pakistan targets minorities. Asia's Christian growth, as Lausanne Movement notes, competes with moderate Islam in Indonesia.

Contemporary Dynamics: Revivalism and Resistance

In the 21st century, particularly by 2025, the Christian-Islamic rivalry has manifested in renewed revivalism and resistance, intertwined with political nationalism and global migration. Christian revivalism in the U.S. and Europe, often linked to far-right ideologies, has surged since the COVID-19 era. PRRI's 2024 American Values Atlas, based on over 22,000 interviews, reveals that about 30% of Americans qualify as Christian nationalism adherents or sympathizers, rising to 45% in Republican-leaning states. Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's blueprint for a potential second Trump administration, explicitly weaves Christian nationalist ideals, advocating for "biblical principles" in governance, including restrictions on abortion and LGBTQ+ rights. Amanda Tyler, executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, warns, "Christian nationalism is a threat to democracy, blending faith with exclusionary politics." Robert Jones, CEO of PRRI, adds, "It's a resurgence of white Christian identity amid demographic shifts." In Europe, a parallel "Christian Right" unites against immigration and secularism, with Hungary's Viktor Orbán declaring, "We are defending Christian Europe against migration." The Canopy Forum's 2024 analysis describes this as a "transnational Christian Right," influencing parties like Germany's AfD (20–30% in 2025 polls) and Italy's Giorgia Meloni, who echoes nationalist rhetoric with Christian undertones.

Islamic resistance, emanating from the Middle East but permeating Europe, encompasses the Iran-backed Axis of Resistance (Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas) and jihadist groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda affiliates. UN reports from 2025 note ISIS's global expansion, with 6,000 fighters in Iraq/Syria, 3,000 in Afghanistan, and growing networks in the Sahel. The fall of Syria's Assad regime in 2024 created vacuums exploited by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS, ex-al-Qaeda), displacing minorities like Druze and Christians. ACLED's 2025 Conflict Watchlist reports doubled Israeli strikes on pro-Iran sites but surging jihadist attacks in Syria. Fondapol's 1979–2024 study attributes 87.5% of Islamist terror deaths to groups like ISIS, Taliban, and al-Qaeda. Olivier Roy, a leading expert on Islamism, notes, "Islamism is a modern reaction to globalization, not medieval." Ayaan Hirsi Ali queries, "Is European society to be taken over by a radical invasion of Muslim immigrants?" In Europe, post-2023 refugee waves from Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon (hundreds of thousands) strain resources, with 50,000+ jihadists estimated in the EU (MI5 2024 warnings). Germany's "Muslim Interaktiv" protests in 2025 demanded a caliphate and Sharia, drawing hundreds, while France's mapping revealed deep Muslim Brotherhood networks influencing politics via "Muslim vote" alliances. The ECR Group warns of "Muslim Brotherhood's vision for Europe." ISIS-K's 2024 Moscow attack (140+ dead) and 2025 plots (e.g., arrests in Turkey/Pakistan) demonstrate transcontinental reach. Politurco notes "Muslim leaders shift to China," seeking alternatives amid Western pressures. Crescent International suggests "Muslims can learn from China's ethic," while Cambridge University Press discusses "Politicization of religion in China." The Gospel Coalition urges "China's rise calls for church response," and MDPI explores "Sinicizing religions in China."

These dynamics create feedback loops: Christian nationalism positions Islam as an existential threat, justifying anti-migrant policies like Orbán's, which in turn fuels jihadist propaganda exploiting "crusader" narratives. Huntington predicted, "The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics." By 2050, Europe's Muslim population could reach 10–15% (Pew), intensifying tensions.

Asia's Rise: A Secular Counterbalance

The ascent of China and broader East/Southeast Asia introduces a multipolar counterbalance to the Christian-Islamic rivalry, prioritizing economic pragmatism over religious evangelism. China's rapid growth—projected GDP surpassing the U.S. by 2030—controls vast resources like rare earths (60% global production) and extends influence via the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), investing over $1 trillion across continents. This secular, state-driven ideology, rooted in Marxism and Confucianism, rejects religious expansion, tightly controlling Christianity and Islam as potential threats. Dominique Reynié warns, "Islam and Chinese totalitarianism are waging two wars against the separation of church and state." Brent Fulton adds, "China expects loyalty to the CCP, regarding religion with suspicion." In Africa and the Middle East, China's investments (e.g., $200 billion in African loans since 2000) prioritize development over missionary agendas, diluting Western Christian-associated aid.

India, with its 1.4 billion people and Hindu majority (79%), counters through nationalist policies resisting evangelism, as Narendra Modi asserts India's pluralism as a bulwark against Abrahamic dominance. Lausanne Movement notes "Asia's Christian growth," but anti-conversion laws target missionaries. Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim-majority nation (87% of 270 million), promotes moderate Islam, resisting extremism. Japan and South Korea's secular, tech-driven societies (minimal Christian/Muslim populations) shift global focus to innovation. Richard Bulliet notes, "Asia's rise dilutes the Christian-Islamic binary." However, challenges persist: China's Uyghur suppression (1 million detained, UN 2025) and India's anti-Muslim violence mirror colonial exclusions. BYU's analysis suggests Asia's models offer alternatives, but internal tensions risk replicating old divides.

Reflection

Reflecting on this vast tapestry, the Christian-Islamic rivalry emerges not as an inevitable clash but as a constructed narrative, amplified by colonial power structures and sustained by neo-colonial inequities. Huntington's "clash of civilizations" framework, while influential, overlooks the shared humanity and internal diversities Said so eloquently critiqued as "ignorance." Data reveals a world where religious demographics shift—Christianity's 2.64 billion adherents steady at 31%, Islam's 2 billion growing to 25%—yet conflicts arise from economic disparities, not inherent dogma. Colonial extraction's $45 trillion from India and Africa's 10 million Congo deaths underscore Rodney's point: underdevelopment is deliberate. Neo-colonial debt traps ($1.2 trillion in Africa) and interventions (200,000 Iraq deaths) perpetuate cycles of resistance, as Nkrumah warned.

Missed aspects like gender—where patriarchal interpretations in both faiths marginalize women, per Mahmood—highlight intersectional vulnerabilities, with stereotypes and interfaith marriage gaps exacerbating divides. Technology's role in digital evangelism and environmental legacies (colonial deforestation exacerbating climate crises) add urgency, as do interfaith efforts like the Aga Khan's, which counter rivalry through dialogue. The 2025 resurgence of Christian nationalism (30% U.S. support) and Islamic resistance (6,000 ISIS fighters) reflects these roots, with far-right and jihadist movements feeding off each other in feedback loops.

Asia's rise—China's secular GDP dominance (18%), India's Hindu pluralism—provides a counterbalance, diluting Abrahamic binaries, as Bulliet suggests. Yet, China's Uyghur suppression and India's communal violence risk new imperialisms. Ultimately, this rivalry's resolution lies in decolonizing minds and economies: reparations, equitable trade, and dialogues fostering what Armstrong calls "compassionate ethics." Without addressing root inequalities, the "war of attrition" persists, collateralizing minorities and indigenous faiths. A multipolar world demands truth-seeking over dominance, embracing Huntington's caution: "Imperialism is the logical consequence of universalism." By prioritizing shared values—justice, sustainability—we can transcend legacies, building a pluralistic future where faith unites rather than divides. As Prophet Muhammad advised kindness to Christians and the Quran affirms Allah's oneness, mutual respect offers a path forward, tempered by Nasr's view of jihad as ethical striving.

References

  1. Pew Research Center. (2025). How the Global Religious Landscape Changed From 2010 to 2020.
  2. Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. (2025). Status of Global Christianity, 2025.
  3. World Population Review. (2025). Religious People by Country 2025.
  4. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster.
  5. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
  6. Said, E. (2001). The Clash of Ignorance. The Nation.
  7. Armstrong, K. (2000). The Battle for God. Knopf.
  8. Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L'Ouverture Publications.
  9. Nkrumah, K. (1965). Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. Thomas Nelson & Sons.
  10. PRRI. (2024). Christian Nationalism Across All 50 States.
  11. UN Reports. (2025). ISIS Fighter Estimates.
  12. ACLED. (2025). Conflict Watchlist.
  13. Patnaik, U. (2018). How Much Did the British Loot from India? Columbia University Press.
  14. Mbembe, A. (2001). On the Postcolony. University of California Press.
  15. Duara, P. (1995). Rescuing History from the Nation. University of Chicago Press.
  16. Fawaz, L. (1994). An Occasion for War. University of California Press.
  17. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety. Princeton University Press.
  18. Various sources from Sage, JSC, ScienceDirect, CBE, Oxford, CMCS, MDPI, Taylor & Francis, as cited.
  19. Additional interfaith and regional studies from CRVP, Dar Al-Ifta, BYU, History.com, JCPA, MEF, Crescent International, Cambridge, Gospel Coalition, Lausanne, Politurco, ECR Group, CFR, Wiley, APA, EC, Guardian, Goodreads.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tamil Nadu’s Economic and Social Journey (1950–2025): A Comparative Analysis with Future Horizons

Executive Summary Tamil Nadu has transformed from an agrarian economy in 1950 to India’s second-largest state economy by 2023–24, with a GSDP of ₹31 lakh crore and a per capita income (₹3,15,220) 1.71 times the national average. Its diversified economy—spanning automotive, textiles, electronics, IT, and sustainable agriculture—is underpinned by a 48.4% urbanization rate, 80.3% literacy, and a 6.5% poverty rate. Compared to Maharashtra, Gujarat, Karnataka, AP, and India, Tamil Nadu excels in social indicators (HDI: 0.708) and diversification, trailing Maharashtra in GSDP scale and Karnataka in IT dominance. Dravidian social reforms, the Green Revolution, post-1991 liberalization, and the 2021 Industrial Policy were pivotal. State budgets show opportunities in infrastructure and renewables but face constraints from welfare spending (40%) and debt (25% GSDP). Projected GSDP growth of 8–9% through 2025 hinges on electronics, IT, and green energy, leveraging strengths like a skilled workfor...

India’s Integrated Air Defense and Surveillance Ecosystem

India’s Integrated Air Defense and Surveillance Ecosystem: An Analysis with Comparisons to Israel and China India’s air defense and surveillance ecosystem, centered on the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS), integrates ground-based radars (e.g., Swordfish, Arudhra), Airborne Early Warning and Control (Netra AEW&C), AWACS (Phalcon), satellites (RISAT, GSAT), and emerging High-Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS) like ApusNeo. Managed by DRDO, BEL, and ISRO, it uses GaN-based radars, SATCOM, and software-defined radios for real-time threat detection and response. The IACCS fuses data via AFNET, supporting network-centric warfare. Compared to Israel’s compact, advanced C4I systems and China’s vast IADS with 30 AWACS, India’s six AWACS/AEW&C and indigenous focus lag in scale but excel in operational experience (e.g., Balakot 2019). Future plans include Netra Mk-1A/Mk-2, AWACS-India, and HAPS by 2030. Challenges include delays, limited fleet size, and foreign platform d...

Financial and Welfare Impact of a 30% U.S. Defense Budget Cut on NATO Member States: Implications for the EU, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain (2025–2030)

 Preamble This analysis aims to estimate the financial, economic, and social welfare impacts on NATO member states if the United States reduces its defense budget by 30% over the next five years (2025–2030) and expects other members to cover the resulting shortfalls in NATO’s common budget and future war-related expenditures. The focus is on the European Union (EU) as a whole and the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, assuming war spending patterns similar to those over the past 35 years (1989–2024), pro-rated for 2025–2030. The report quantifies the additional spending required, expresses it as a percentage of GDP, and evaluates the impact on Europe’s welfare economies, including potential shortfalls in social spending. It also identifies beneficiaries of the current NATO funding structure. By providing historical contributions, projected costs, and welfare implications, this report informs policymakers about the challenges of redistributing NATO’s financial resp...