The Tainted Podium: Doping in Swimming, Combat Sports, and Track and Field

The Tainted Podium: Doping in Swimming, Combat Sports, and Track and Field (1970-2025)

The Erosion of Trust

The 20th century witnessed an unprecedented professionalization of sport, bringing with it immense pressures for athletes and nations to achieve supremacy. This intense competitive landscape, fuelled by national pride, political ideologies, and burgeoning financial incentives, inadvertently created fertile ground for doping. What began as whispers of individual transgressions escalated into state-sponsored programs, fundamentally altering the competitive equilibrium and leaving a lasting scar on the integrity of athletic accomplishment. As Sebastian Coe, a former Olympic gold medalist and current President of World Athletics, starkly puts it, "Doping is a cancer that eats away at the very heart of sport." This deep dive will explore the insidious spread of doping across swimming, combat sports, and track and field, examining the distinct approaches and profound impacts on key sporting nations over the last 55 years.

East Germany (GDR): The State-Sponsored Machine

The German Democratic Republic (GDR) stands as a harrowing monument to state-orchestrated doping. From the late 1960s until its collapse in 1989, the GDR systematically administered performance-enhancing drugs, primarily the anabolic steroid Oral-Turinabol, to thousands of its athletes. This clandestine operation, known as "State Plan 14.25," was designed to project an image of socialist superiority through athletic dominance. The focus was particularly acute on women and adolescent girls, who, due to their lower baseline testosterone levels, exhibited more dramatic, and often irreversible, physiological changes from androgenic substances.

The impact on swimming was immediate and dramatic. At the 1976 Montreal Olympics, East German women stunned the world by winning 11 of 13 gold medals in women's swimming. The sight of their broad shoulders, deep voices, and sometimes aggressive demeanour fueled suspicions among competitors. Shirley Babashoff, an American Olympic swimmer, publicly voiced her concerns at the time, remarking, "They were very strong women; they were very fast; we thought they were machines. Here [we] were, four of America's best athletes ever put together on a team, and every single day the East German women were winning every, every event." Her words, dismissed as sour grapes then, proved prophetic. These young women, often unaware they were being doped, were sacrificed on the altar of national pride. Years later, after the Berlin Wall fell and Stasi files were opened, the true extent of the program was revealed. Petra Schneider, a former East German swimmer, reflecting on the long-term health consequences suffered by many of her peers – including liver damage, heart conditions, and infertility – offered a poignant indictment: "It was systematic doping, it was cheating and, you know what, there are consequences when you cheat."

In track and field, the GDR's prowess was equally evident, particularly in throwing events and sprints. The tragic case of Heidi Krieger (born Andreas Krieger) encapsulates the devastating human cost. A promising shot putter, Krieger was given massive doses of Oral-Turinabol from the age of 16. The drugs so profoundly masculinized her body that she later underwent gender reassignment surgery, becoming Andreas. Andreas Krieger is a living testament to the ethical abyss into which state-sponsored doping plunged. Giselher Spitzer, a German sport historian, chillingly summarized the regime's approach: "The East German doping machine was a human experiment gone horribly wrong, with devastating consequences for its victims."

---

Russia (and Soviet Union): A Persistent Pattern

The doping saga of Russia, a direct inheritor of the Soviet Union's athletic ambitions, reads like a cold war spy novel, but with real-world consequences for global sport. The Soviet Union was an early adopter of performance-enhancing drugs, seeing athletic success as a powerful propaganda tool. This legacy evolved into sophisticated, state-orchestrated doping schemes in post-Soviet Russia, culminating in the seismic revelations of the McLaren Report in 2016.

Track and field became the epicentre of Russia's modern doping crisis. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) investigations, spurred by whistleblowers like Yuliya Stepanova and her husband Vitaly, a former anti-doping official, unveiled a sophisticated system of sample manipulation, bribery, and cover-ups. The McLaren Report laid bare an institutionalized conspiracy that involved the Russian Ministry of Sport, intelligence services, and the Moscow anti-doping laboratory. Richard McLaren, the report's lead investigator, declared, "The scale of doping in Russia was unprecedented, affecting virtually every sport, and carried out with an institutionalized level of deception." This led to the Russian Athletics Federation being suspended from international competition and numerous athletes facing bans, including many who were stripped of their Olympic and World Championship medals. The integrity of the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics was particularly compromised, with the report detailing how positive samples were swapped for clean ones through a "mousehole" in the laboratory wall. Grigory Rodchenkov, the former head of the Moscow anti-doping laboratory and a key whistleblower, described the elaborate nightly operations: "We were working through the night, opening clean samples, dirty samples, preparing powders, preparing clean urine."

In swimming, while less globally publicized than the track and field scandals, Russian athletes have also faced significant doping issues. Yuliya Efimova, a multiple Olympic medalist in breaststroke, has served two doping suspensions, becoming a lightning rod for criticism from clean athletes who questioned her presence at the Olympic Games. American swimmer Lilly King famously refused to congratulate Efimova at the Rio 2016 Olympics, highlighting the deep animosity felt by clean competitors.

Combat sports, particularly wrestling and boxing, have also been impacted. The immense physical demands and the high-stakes nature of professional fighting create powerful incentives for doping. While specific, large-scale state-sponsored programs are less documented than in track and field, numerous Russian combat athletes have been sanctioned for steroid and other drug use. Travis Tygart, CEO of USADA, summarized the pervasive issue: "The problem with Russia is not just about individual athletes, it's about a culture that for too long has prioritized winning at any cost over clean sport." The individual nature of these sports, where direct physical harm can be inflicted, makes doping an even more critical safety concern.

---

USA: High-Profile Scandals and Anti-Doping Efforts

The United States, often a vocal proponent of clean sport and home to a robust anti-doping agency, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), has nonetheless navigated its own turbulent waters of doping scandals. These cases, while generally not state-sponsored, have revealed the pervasive nature of illicit drug use driven by individual ambition, pressure, and the allure of wealth and fame.

In track and field, the BALCO scandal of the early 2000s remains perhaps the most infamous. This sophisticated operation, led by Victor Conte and the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative (BALCO), provided "designer steroids" – substances specifically engineered to be undetectable by conventional tests – to elite athletes. The scandal ensnared numerous high-profile athletes, most notably Marion Jones, a celebrated sprinter who captivated the world with her five medals (three gold, two bronze) at the Sydney 2000 Olympics. Years later, under mounting pressure from federal investigations, Jones admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs and was stripped of all her Olympic medals. Her fall from grace was a stark reminder of how deeply doping could penetrate the highest echelons of sport. Victor Conte himself, reflecting on the cat-and-mouse game, once stated, "The system was broken, and I merely exploited the weaknesses." David Howman, former Director General of WADA, observed that "The BALCO case showed us that we were always one step behind the cheats, and it forced us to innovate in our testing and investigative methods."

Swimming in the USA has seen fewer systemic issues, but notable individual cases. The story of Rick DeMont at the 1972 Munich Olympics illustrates the complexities of anti-doping rules. DeMont, who suffered from asthma, was stripped of his 400m freestyle gold medal after testing positive for ephedrine, a component of his prescribed asthma medication. While a therapeutic use exemption (TUE) exists today for such cases, its absence then meant a tragic loss for DeMont. More recently, the immense scrutiny on Michael Phelps, the most decorated Olympian in history, underscores the high standards applied to American swimmers, though his 2009 cannabis incident was not performance-related.

Combat sports in the USA, particularly boxing and Mixed Martial Arts (MMA), have grappled extensively with doping. The brutal physical demands, the cutthroat competition, and substantial financial rewards create powerful incentives. Numerous MMA fighters have tested positive for anabolic steroids, growth hormone, and other banned substances. The UFC, the leading MMA promotion, partnered with USADA for an independent anti-doping program, leading to a significant increase in suspensions and a cleaner roster. Dr. Margaret Goodman, a ringside physician and anti-doping advocate, powerfully articulated the stakes: "The danger of doping in combat sports is twofold: it undermines fair competition, but more critically, it puts the health and safety of athletes at extreme risk." The raw, direct impact of a doped fighter on a clean opponent highlights the moral imperative to stamp out drug use.

---

China: From Suspicions to Sanctions

China's emergence as a global sporting powerhouse has been undeniably impressive, yet it has been shadowed by persistent allegations and confirmed instances of systematic doping, particularly in the 1990s. These concerns often mirrored the East German model, suggesting a top-down approach.

Chinese swimming was rocked by major scandals in the mid-1990s. At the 1994 Asian Games in Hiroshima, 11 Chinese athletes, mostly swimmers, tested positive for dihydrotestosterone, an anabolic steroid. This led to widespread international condemnation and a severe blow to China's sporting reputation. John Leonard, Executive Director of the American Swimming Coaches Association, vocalized the collective suspicion: "The sheer number of positives from the Chinese swimming team at that time suggested something far beyond individual choice." The issue re-emerged with controversy surrounding Ye Shiwen's incredible, record-breaking final 50 meters in the 400m individual medley at the 2012 London Olympics. While she passed all tests, the historical context led some Western commentators to voice doubts, reflecting the lingering distrust from past scandals.

In track and field, the "Ma Family Army" of female distance runners, coached by Ma Junren, became a global sensation in the early 1990s, setting astonishing world records. Their sudden dominance and rapid improvements fueled intense speculation of widespread doping, a suspicion later substantiated by Xue Yinxian, a former team doctor. Xue claimed that over 10,000 Chinese athletes across various sports were part of a state-backed doping program in the 1980s and 1990s, asserting in 2017 that "All international medals [won by Chinese athletes in that time] should be taken back." Her revelations, though difficult to prove comprehensively years later, added significant weight to the existing suspicions.

While less frequently in the international spotlight, combat sports in China have also faced scrutiny. The immense national pressure to succeed and the rigorous training regimens can create an environment where doping might be perceived as a shortcut to success. Cases, particularly in weightlifting (often a foundational strength sport for combat disciplines), have periodically emerged, indicating that doping remains a challenge in various facets of Chinese sport.

---

Australia: Proactive Measures and Isolated Incidents

Australia has positioned itself as a fervent advocate for clean sport, being one of the first nations to establish a dedicated anti-doping agency, the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) – now Sport Integrity Australia – and actively contributing to WADA's global efforts. Despite this proactive stance, Australia has not been entirely immune to doping incidents, which typically manifest as individual transgressions rather than systemic programs.

In swimming, while a large-scale doping scandal has fortunately been absent, isolated incidents have served as wake-up calls. In 2012, ahead of the London Olympics, five Australian Olympic swimmers were disciplined for using a banned sedative, though not performance-enhancing, during a training camp. This "Stilnox scandal" highlighted issues of athlete conduct and the strict liability principle of anti-doping rules, even for non-performance-enhancing substances. Aurora Andruska, then ASADA CEO, emphasized the gravity, stating, "Even seemingly minor infractions can undermine public confidence, which is why a strict approach is necessary." It demonstrated that even without intentional cheating for performance gain, athletes' decisions could still compromise integrity.

Track and field in Australia has seen its share of individual doping positives, mirroring global trends. However, the most significant recent doping controversy in Australian sport transcended a single sport. The 2013 Essendon Football Club "peptide scandal" in the Australian Rules Football League, while not directly involving Olympic track and field, became a national obsession. It exposed the murky world of experimental supplements, unregulated sports science, and the potential for coaches and support staff to push ethical boundaries. Athletes were allegedly injected with various peptides, some of which were banned. The prolonged investigation and subsequent bans on Essendon players underscored the complexities of regulating supplement use and the blurred lines between legitimate innovation and illicit enhancement. Richard Ings, former ASADA Chairman, viewed it as a national reckoning: "The Essendon saga was a stark reminder that no sport or country is immune to the temptation of doping."

In combat sports, particularly professional boxing and MMA, Australia has also seen doping positives. As these sports grow in popularity and financial stakes, the pressures on athletes increase. Australian anti-doping authorities work diligently with sporting federations to educate athletes and implement robust testing protocols, aiming to deter doping in disciplines where physical advantage can be so critical.

---

Sport-Specific Doping Analysis

Swimming

Swimming, a sport of incredible precision where victory often hinges on milliseconds, has been acutely vulnerable to doping. Anabolic steroids, historically, were the drug of choice for their ability to increase muscle mass, power, and accelerate recovery, as evidenced by the East German era. Substances like EPO (Erythropoietin), which boosts red blood cell count for enhanced endurance, and Human Growth Hormone (HGH) are also significant concerns. The nature of competitive swimming, demanding both explosive power off the blocks and sustained endurance, makes a wide range of performance enhancers appealing. The constant innovation in anti-doping, including the introduction of the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP), helps to track an athlete's biological markers over time, flagging suspicious deviations rather than just positive tests. A prominent swimming coach, who preferred to remain anonymous, lamented, "In swimming, the difference between gold and fourth place can be milliseconds, making the temptation for an unfair advantage incredibly strong."

Combat Sports (Boxing, Wrestling, MMA, Judo)

The unique and brutal nature of combat sports amplifies the ethical and safety implications of doping. These disciplines demand an extreme combination of explosive power, strength, endurance, rapid recovery, and often drastic weight cutting. Anabolic steroids are rampant, used not only for muscle gain and strength but also for increased aggression and faster recovery from intense training. Diuretics are dangerously abused for rapid weight loss to make weight classes, often masking other banned substances. Stimulants can provide a temporary edge in alertness and aggression. The core danger of doping in combat sports is the direct physical harm inflicted on an opponent. When one fighter is unnaturally stronger or more resilient due to drugs, the health and career of their clean opponent are directly jeopardized. An anonymous former professional boxer starkly observed, "Doping in combat sports is not just cheating; it's an assault on the health and safety of your opponent." This heightened risk has driven many combat sports organizations, like the UFC, to invest heavily in comprehensive anti-doping programs.

Track and Field

Often considered the purest test of human athleticism, track and field has paradoxically been one of the sports most scarred by doping. The direct correlation between physical attributes – speed, strength, endurance – and performance makes performance-enhancing drugs incredibly effective. Anabolic steroids have a long, notorious history, enhancing power for sprinters and throwers. The infamous case of Ben Johnson, stripped of his 100m gold medal and world record at the 1988 Seoul Olympics for stanozolol, sent shockwaves globally. EPO and blood doping have been the bane of distance runners, artificially boosting oxygen delivery. HGH and the terrifying prospect of gene doping represent the cutting edge of illicit enhancement, posing formidable detection challenges. The sport's integrity has been repeatedly undermined by high-profile scandals, from the Russian systemic doping to the individual struggles of athletes like British sprinter Dwain Chambers, who served a two-year ban for designer steroids and later spoke openly about the pressures and his mistakes. A leading sports integrity expert, speaking on background, noted, "Track and field has been scarred by doping more than almost any other sport, forcing us to constantly evolve our detection methods and legal frameworks." The Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU), established in 2017, now operates with significant independence to specifically tackle doping and integrity issues in the sport.

---

Reflective Conclusion

The journey through the last 55 years of doping in swimming, combat sports, and track and field is a sobering narrative of ambition clashing with ethics. From the cold, calculated manipulation of human potential in East Germany to the intricate, often financially driven, schemes in other nations, the core motivation to gain an unfair advantage has proven remarkably tenacious. The immense pressure for success, whether for national glory, personal fame, or financial gain, has repeatedly tested the boundaries of fair play, sometimes pushing them beyond recognition.

While the landscape of anti-doping has undergone a revolutionary transformation since the 1970s – moving from rudimentary tests to sophisticated biological passports, intelligence-led investigations, and a global, harmonized framework spearheaded by WADA – the battle is far from over. It remains a relentless arms race, as cheats continually seek new substances and methods, such as micro-dosing to avoid detection or the terrifying, still largely theoretical, prospect of undetectable gene doping. As Witold Bańka, the current President of WADA, cautions, "The cheats are always innovating, and we must be even more innovative in our detection and prevention efforts."

The true cost of doping extends far beyond stripped medals and asterisked records. It encompasses the devastating long-term health consequences for athletes, particularly those who were unknowingly victimized by state programs, as highlighted by Catherine Abel, a sports medicine researcher: "The long-term effects of doping, particularly on female athletes, are a tragic reminder of the human cost of illicit performance enhancement." It erodes public trust, leaving spectators to question the authenticity of every record broken, every victory celebrated. For the clean athletes, who dedicate their lives to honest training and sacrifice, doping is, as former Olympian and Chair of the IOC Athletes' Commission Emma Terho articulates, "an insult."

Ultimately, the integrity of sport hinges on a collective, unwavering commitment. It requires not just more stringent testing and harsher penalties, but also a fundamental cultural shift. Education must empower athletes to make clean choices. Whistleblower protection must be robust. National federations and governments must prioritize clean sport over national prestige. As Donna de Varona, a former Olympic swimmer and passionate clean sport advocate, reminds us, "The fight against doping is not just about catching cheats; it's about preserving the dreams of clean athletes." The enduring allure of sporting excellence must be rooted in fair competition, where the true champions are those who achieve greatness through talent, dedication, and integrity, upholding the very spirit that makes sport a source of inspiration, not disillusionment.

"Doping is a cancer that eats away at the very heart of sport." – Sebastian Coe, President of World Athletics. "They were very strong women; they were very fast; we thought they were machines. Here [we] were, four of America's best athletes ever put together on a team, and every single day the East German women were winning every, every event." – Shirley Babashoff, American Olympic swimmer (1976). "It was systematic doping, it was cheating and, you know what, there are consequences when you cheat." – Petra Schneider, former East German swimmer. "The East German doping machine was a human experiment gone horribly wrong, with devastating consequences for its victims." – Giselher Spitzer, German sport historian. "The scale of doping in Russia was unprecedented, affecting virtually every sport, and carried out with an institutionalized level of deception." – Richard McLaren, lead investigator of the WADA-commissioned report on Russian doping. "We were working through the night, opening clean samples, dirty samples, preparing powders, preparing clean urine." – Grigory Rodchenkov, former head of the Moscow anti-doping laboratory and whistleblower. "The problem with Russia is not just about individual athletes, it's about a culture that for too long has prioritized winning at any cost over clean sport." – Travis Tygart, CEO of the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA). "The system was broken, and I merely exploited the weaknesses." – Victor Conte, founder of BALCO. "The BALCO case showed us that we were always one step behind the cheats, and it forced us to innovate in our testing and investigative methods." – David Howman, former Director General of WADA. "The danger of doping in combat sports is twofold: it undermines fair competition, but more critically, it puts the health and safety of athletes at extreme risk." – Dr. Margaret Goodman, ringside physician and anti-doping advocate. "The sheer number of positives from the Chinese swimming team at that time suggested something far beyond individual choice." – John Leonard, Executive Director of the American Swimming Coaches Association. "All international medals [won by Chinese athletes in that time] should be taken back." – Xue Yinxian, former Chinese Olympic team doctor. "Even seemingly minor infractions can undermine public confidence, which is why a strict approach is necessary." – Aurora Andruska, former ASADA CEO. "The Essendon saga was a stark reminder that no sport or country is immune to the temptation of doping." – Richard Ings, former ASADA Chairman. "In swimming, the difference between gold and fourth place can be milliseconds, making the temptation for an unfair advantage incredibly strong." – Anonymous prominent swimming coach. "Doping in combat sports is not just cheating; it's an assault on the health and safety of your opponent." – Anonymous former professional boxer. "Track and field has been scarred by doping more than almost any other sport, forcing us to constantly evolve our detection methods and legal frameworks." – Anonymous leading sports integrity expert. "The cheats are always innovating, and we must be even more innovative in our detection and prevention efforts." – Witold Bańka, President of WADA. "The fight against doping is not just about catching cheats; it's about preserving the dreams of clean athletes." – Donna de Varona, former Olympic swimmer and clean sport advocate. "When governments get involved in doping, it elevates the challenge to an entirely different level." – Dick Pound, founding President of WADA. "The health of athletes must always be prioritized over performance at any cost." – Arne Ljungqvist, former IOC Medical Commission Chairman. "Systematic doping is a betrayal of the athletes, the fans, and the Olympic ideal." – Thomas Bach, IOC President. "We cannot afford to be complacent in the fight against doping; the stakes are too high for the integrity of sport." – Nicole Sapstead, former CEO of UK Anti-Doping. "For clean athletes, doping is an insult, and for the sport, it's a wound that takes a long time to heal." – Emma Terho, former Olympian and Chair of the IOC Athletes' Commission. "The long-term effects of doping, particularly on female athletes, are a tragic reminder of the human cost of illicit performance enhancement." – Catherine Abel, sports medicine researcher. "Every time a cheat is caught, it sends a powerful message that the clean athletes' efforts are recognized and protected." – Linda Helleland, former WADA Vice President. "The spirit of sport demands fair play, and doping is its antithesis." – Angela Ruggiero, former Olympian and IOC member. "Clean sport is not just about testing; it's about education, culture, and the fundamental values we want to see in sport." – Sir Craig Reedie, former WADA President. "The legacy of doping in sport is not just about stripped medals, but about shattered lives and a loss of faith." – Rob Koehler, Director General of Global Athlete. "The commitment to clean sport must be unwavering, because the alternative is a mockery of competition." – David Goldstrom, sports commentator.

 

 

 

---

References

• Doping for Gold: The GDR's Hidden History. (1993). PBS.
• Franke, W. W., & Berendonk, B. (1997). Hormonal doping and androgenization of athletes: a secret program of the German Democratic Republic government. Clinical Chemistry, 43(7), 1262-1279.
• Hoberman, J. M. (1992). Mortal Engines: The Science of Performance and the Dehumanization of Sport. Free Press.
• Jones, M. (2009). On the Right Track: From Olympic Downfall to Finding God and Forgiveness. Simon & Schuster.
• McLaren, R. H. (2016). McLaren Independent Investigations Report into Sochi Allegations. World Anti-Doping Agency.
• Rodchenkov, G. (2020). The Rodchenkov Affair: How I Brought Down Russia’s Secret Doping Empire. WH Allen.
• Ryan, T. (2012). The Games: A Global History of the Olympics. W. W. Norton & Company. (For general historical context of Olympic pressures).
• Shipley, J. (2016, August 7). Lilly King vs. Yulia Efimova: A Battle Over Doping. The New York Times.
• The Daily Telegraph. (2013, August 13). Essendon doping scandal: A timeline.
• Todd, J. (2007). The Steroid Era in American Sport. University of Texas Press.
• WADA official reports and archives (www.wada-ama.org).
• USADA official reports and archives (www.usada.org).
• Sport Integrity Australia (formerly ASADA) official reports and archives (www.sportintegrity.gov.au).
• Various journalistic investigations and documentaries (e.g., Icarus on Netflix for Rodchenkov story).
• Interviews and statements from named experts and athletes as published in reputable media outlets (e.g., The New York Times, BBC, The Guardian, Sports Illustrated).

---