Stubble
Burning in India: Prevalence, Emissions, and Sectoral Comparisons (2010-11 vs.
2024-25)
Is Stubble Burning a North
Indian Issue Only?
Stubble burning, the open-field
incineration of crop residues (primarily rice and wheat straw), is not
exclusively a North Indian phenomenon but is overwhelmingly concentrated in the
northern Indo-Gangetic Plains due to intensive rice-wheat cropping systems,
short harvest-to-sowing windows (e.g., 10-15 days post-rice harvest in
October-November), and socio-economic pressures on smallholder farmers. States
like Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh (UP), Bihar, Madhya Pradesh (MP), and
Rajasthan account for over 80% of incidents and burned residues, driven by
paddy cultivation. Southern and central states (e.g., Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu
[TN], Andhra Pradesh [AP], Telangana) experience far lower rates, as their
cropping patterns allow more time for residue incorporation or alternative uses
like fodder or bioenergy, reducing the urgency to burn. However, burning occurs
sporadically in these regions for crops like sugarcane, maize, and cotton,
contributing 10-15% of national totals. Nationally, ~25% of generated crop residues
(~120-140 Mt annually from ~500 Mt total generation) are burned, exacerbating
seasonal air pollution spikes in northern cities like Delhi. Evidence from
satellite data (NASA FIRMS and ISRO) confirms this north-south divide, with
90%+ of fire hotspots in northern states during peak seasons.
The top 12 agricultural states by crop production (based on foodgrain
output: UP, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, MP, Karnataka, AP, Gujarat, TN, Bihar, West
Bengal [WB], Telangana, Punjab/Haryana combined) generate ~70% of India's
residues, but burning hotspots are limited to the top 6 northern ones. Gujarat
and Karnataka report negligible burning (<1% of residues).
Extent of Stubble Burning in Top 12
States (Incidents and Burned Residue Volumes)
Data on incidents (fire counts from
satellites) and burned residue volumes (Mt, estimated via residue generation
models and % burned) vary by source due to detection limits (e.g., small fires
missed by MODIS) and reporting periods (kharif rice: Oct-Nov; rabi wheat:
Apr-May). 2024-25 saw a 30-70% decline in northern incidents vs. prior years,
attributed to subsidies for machinery (e.g., Punjab's Super SMS) and
enforcement, but surges in MP/UP offset some gains; total national incidents
~10,000-12,000 (vs. 20,000+ peaks in 2019-20). Burned volumes are derived from
generation estimates (e.g., 1.5-2 t/ha for rice straw) and satellite-burned
area (~50-100 ha/incident average).
|
State |
2010-11 Incidents (Est.) |
2010-11 Burned Residue (Mt) |
2024-25 Incidents |
2024-25 Burned Residue (Mt) |
% Change in Burned Volume |
|
Punjab |
~15,000 |
21.3 |
~3,600 |
~6.0 |
-72% |
|
Haryana |
~8,000 |
9.2 |
~200 |
~2.0 |
-78% |
|
UP |
~10,000 |
22.3 |
~1,000 |
~10.0 |
-55% |
|
Bihar |
~2,000 |
4.5 |
~300 |
~2.0 |
-56% |
|
Maharashtra |
~1,500 |
6.8 |
~500 |
~3.0 |
-56% |
|
TN |
~500 |
2.5 |
~200 |
~1.0 |
-60% |
|
AP |
~400 |
2.8 |
~150 |
~1.0 |
-64% |
|
Telangana |
~300 |
2.0 |
~100 |
~0.8 |
-60% |
|
MP |
~3,000 |
4.0 |
~2,900 |
~10.0 |
+150% |
|
Rajasthan |
~2,500 |
5.0 |
~700 |
~5.0 |
0% |
|
Karnataka |
~600 |
2.5 |
~200 |
~1.0 |
-60% |
|
WB |
~1,000 |
3.0 |
~400 |
~1.5 |
-50% |
|
National Total |
~45,000 |
~85.9 |
~10,000 |
~43.3 |
-50% |
Sources/Notes: 2010-11 incidents
extrapolated from residue volumes and historical NASA data (~2x 2024 levels
pre-decline); volumes from remote sensing models (e.g., UP/Punjab peaks).
2024-25 incidents from CAQM/NASA/ISRO (Sep 15-Nov 6); volumes adjusted for
50-70% decline in north, surges in central states (e.g., MP wheat/rice).
National burned volume halved, reflecting policy impacts (e.g., NPMCR 2014),
but absolute levels remain high (~20 Mt rice straw alone).
Contribution to CO2 and Other Harmful
Emissions (State-Wise and National)
Emissions from stubble burning are
calculated using standard factors: CO2 ~1.45 t/t residue (dry basis, 91-95% of
carbon oxidized); PM2.5 ~4-8 kg/t (avg. 6 kg/t, higher for rice); CO ~80-100
kg/t; NOx ~3-5 kg/t; SOx ~0.3-0.5 kg/t. Rice burning emits 20-30% more PM2.5/CO
than wheat due to silica content. Annual totals are seasonal (80% Oct-Nov), but national aggregates
are used here. Stubble contributes ~4-6% of India's annual CO2 but 15-20% of
PM2.5 during peaks, with black carbon (soot) amplifying warming.
|
State |
2010-11 CO2 (Mt) |
2010-11 PM2.5 (kt) |
2024-25 CO2 (Mt) |
2024-25 PM2.5 (kt) |
Key Notes (Other Emissions) |
|
Punjab |
31 |
128 |
8.7 |
36 |
High NOx (65 kt '24);
rice-dominant. |
|
Haryana |
13 |
55 |
2.9 |
12 |
CO ~200 kt '24; 97% incident drop. |
|
UP |
32 |
134 |
14.5 |
60 |
Surge in '24; SOx ~3 kt. |
|
Bihar |
7 |
27 |
2.9 |
12 |
Low but rising wheat burning. |
|
Maharashtra |
10 |
41 |
4.4 |
18 |
Sugarcane tops PM (25% of state
total). |
|
TN |
4 |
15 |
1.5 |
6 |
Minimal; mostly maize. |
|
AP |
4 |
17 |
1.5 |
6 |
Declining; coastal winds disperse. |
|
Telangana |
3 |
12 |
1.2 |
5 |
Rice ~70% of emissions. |
|
MP |
6 |
24 |
14.5 |
60 |
Wheat surge; NOx ~30 kt '24. |
|
Rajasthan |
7 |
30 |
7.3 |
30 |
Arid; high CO (500 kt). |
|
Karnataka |
4 |
15 |
1.5 |
6 |
Negligible rice burning. |
|
WB |
4 |
18 |
2.2 |
9 |
Flood-prone; low enforcement. |
|
National |
125 |
516 |
63 |
260 |
CO ~4,300 kt '24; NOx ~150 kt; SOx
~15 kt. |
Sources/Notes: Derived from residue
volumes above and EFs (e.g., CO2=1.45×residue; PM2.5=0.006×residue). National
CO2 fell ~50% (mirroring volumes), but PM2.5 halved less sharply due to larger
fires in MP/UP; total GHG equiv. ~150-180 MtCO2e '24 (incl. CH4/N2O). Growth?
Problem shrank overall (better management), but shifted south/central, with
per-incident emissions up 20-30% from larger fields.
Comparison to Other Sectors: Coal Power,
Transport, Industrial Pollution
Stubble's CO2 footprint is modest
annually (~2-4% of national total ~3 GtCO2 '24 vs. ~1.8 Gt '10) but spikes
PM2.5 (15-25% of seasonal national emissions, vs. <5% yearly). Coal power
dominates CO2 (40-50% of energy emissions), transport ~13%, industry ~20%.
Stubble's short-lived PM/black carbon rivals transport/industry during Oct-Nov
(e.g., 30-50% Delhi PM2.5), but yearly it's dwarfed. Policies reduced stubble's
share (from ~7% CO2 equiv. '10 to ~2% '24), while other sectors grew 50-70%.
|
Sector |
2010-11 CO2 (Gt) |
2024-25 CO2 (Gt) |
% National CO2 |
PM2.5 Contrib. (kt/yr, Est.) |
Key Trends |
|
Stubble Burning |
0.125 |
0.063 |
2-4% |
260 ('24) |
-50%; seasonal PM hotspot. |
|
Coal Thermal Power |
~0.70 |
~1.20 |
40-50% |
~1,500 ('24) |
+71%; record highs '24. |
|
Transport |
~0.20 |
~0.40 |
12-15% |
~800 ('24) |
+100%; road 88%. |
|
Industry |
~0.40 |
~0.70 |
20-25% |
~2,000 ('24) |
+75%; cement/steel drivers. |
|
National Total |
~1.80 |
~3.00 |
100% |
~10,000 ('24) |
+67%; energy 92%. |
Sources/Notes: CO2 from IEA/UNFCCC
(power: 901 Mt '10 →1.18 Gt '23; transport: 156 Mt '01→368 Mt '20,
extrapolated; industry incl. manufacturing). PM2.5 est. from sectoral models
(stubble ~3% yearly total, but 20%+ in north peaks). Stubble's growth reversed
(net reduction), unlike fossil sectors, but unmet targets (e.g., Punjab's 100%
management) risk rebound.
In summary, while stubble burning has declined 50% in volume/emissions
since 2010-11 due to interventions, it remains a critical air quality driver in
northern India, contributing disproportionately to PM2.5 despite minor CO2
role. Scaling bioenergy/fodder alternatives could eliminate it by 2030,
aligning with India's NDCs.
Effectiveness of Mitigation Strategies
for Stubble Burning in India (2010-11 vs. 2024-25)
Introduction
Stubble burning mitigation in India has
evolved from ad-hoc enforcement in the early 2010s to a multi-pronged approach
by 2025, emphasizing technology, incentives, policy bans, and behavioral
interventions. The National Policy for Management of Crop Residues (NPMCR,
2014) marked a turning point, promoting in-situ management over open burning.
By 2024-25, incidents fell ~78% nationally from 2010-11 peaks (~45,000 to
~10,000 fires), and burned residues halved (~86 Mt to ~43 Mt), driven by
subsidies for machinery like Happy Seeders and Super SMS (Straw Management
System). However, effectiveness varies: short-term gains from bans (30% fire
reduction) fade due to weak enforcement, while machinery adoption yields
sustained 50-80% local reductions but faces scalability hurdles. Health
benefits are notable (e.g., 10-13% fewer fires via incentives averting 1.8-2.7
infant deaths/1,000 births if scaled), yet burning persists at ~25% of
residues, contributing 2-4% of national CO2 and 15-20% seasonal PM2.5. This
note assesses key strategies using satellite data (NASA MODIS/VIIRS),
government reports, and studies up to 2025.
Key Mitigation Strategies and Their
Mechanisms
- Regulatory Bans and
Enforcement: NGT ban (2015) and Supreme Court directives (2019)
prohibit burning with fines (Rs. 2,500-15,000/ha). Supported by satellite
monitoring and penalties.
- Machinery Subsidies
(In-Situ Management): 80-100% subsidies under Sub-Mission on
Agricultural Mechanization (SMAM, 2014) and Crop Residue Management Scheme
(2018) for Happy Seeders (cuts, sows, mulches in one pass) and Super SMS
(harvests without residue scattering).
- Incentive
Structures: Bureaucrat performance-linked efforts (e.g., wind-pattern
monitoring) and conditional cash transfers to farmers.
- Crop
Diversification and Bioenergy: NPMCR promotes alternatives like
short-duration paddy varieties and biomass co-firing in power plants (5%
mandate from 2024-25).
- Behavioral and
Community Interventions: Awareness campaigns, GIS mapping, and farmer
training via initiatives like Reviving Green Revolution (RGR, 2018) and
HARIT (2019).
Effectiveness Metrics: Quantitative
Impacts (2010-11 vs. 2024-25)
Strategies have reduced fires by 70-80% in
hotspots like Punjab/Haryana, but national progress is uneven—northern states
saw 50-72% drops, while central states (e.g., MP) rose 150%. Health and
emission gains are seasonal and localized.
|
Strategy |
Key Metrics (2010-11) |
Key Metrics (2024-25) |
% Change/Effectiveness |
Evidence/Notes |
|
Bans & Enforcement |
~45,000 national fires; weak
pre-2015 enforcement (0.05-4% fined). |
~10,000 fires; 30% short-term
reduction (2017-18), but reverted by 2020; 10-13% ongoing via incentives.
Punjab: 515 fires (Oct 13-28, 2025) vs. higher in 2024. |
+78% fire reduction overall;
temporary (2-3 yrs) due to low fines (Rs. 37/ha max). |
NGT ban: 31% grid-level drop;
incentives: 54-72 fewer fires/district/yr. Averted PM2.5: 10-15% seasonal. |
|
Machinery (Happy Seeder/Super
SMS) |
Negligible adoption; ~85 Mt burned. |
51% increase in Happy Seeders; 80%
non-burning in pilots (4,000+ ha covered). Punjab: 20% less burnt area (2.46
vs. 3.15 lakh ha, Oct 2025 vs. 2024). |
50-80% local reduction; yield
+0.34-0.40 t/ha, profit +6.5% (Rs. 10-12k/ha). |
RGR/HARIT: 56% users; pest risks
noted, but timely sowing (48% benefit). Emission cuts: Proportional to 43 Mt
burned (vs. 86 Mt). |
|
Incentives & Behavioral |
Minimal; no structured programs. |
14-22% fire drop near borders via
wind incentives; campaigns reached 256k farmers. |
10-13% avg. reduction; 4.4-6.6%
lower child mortality if scaled. |
Bureaucrat effort: +9-13%
deterrence post-fines; 24-26 infant deaths/1k births averted per log PM2.5
drop. |
|
Diversification/Bioenergy |
Early pilots; <5% co-firing. |
5% biomass mandate; short paddy in
20% Punjab area. |
14% local reduction near plants;
national: 50% burned residue drop. |
NPMCR: Diversification cut urgency;
co-firing utilizes ~5 Mt residues/yr. |
|
Overall National |
516 kt PM2.5; 125 Mt CO2. |
260 kt PM2.5; 63 Mt CO2. |
-50% emissions; 15-25% seasonal
PM2.5 share persists. |
Satellite data: 60% fire rise
pre-2015, then 70% decline. |
Notes: Data from NASA/ISRO
satellites; health from DHS/CAMS (2015-21, extrapolated). Punjab 2025 declines
due to delayed harvest (rains) + machinery (20% area drop). Effectiveness
higher in rice zones (22% vs. 10% avg.).
Temporal Progress: How the Problem Has
Evolved (2010-11 to 2024-25)
- 2010-11 Baseline:
High burning (~86 Mt) amid rice-wheat intensification; no national policy,
reliance on 1981 Air Act (ineffective). Fires peaked at ~45,000; emissions
drove 17.8% premature deaths.
- 2011-15 (Pre-NPMCR):
15% fire increase (2002-2016 trend); early subsidies under SMAM began
machinery uptake.
- 2015-20 (Ban Era):
NGT ban + NPMCR: 30% fire drop (2017-18), but rebound by 2019 (weak
fines). RGR/HARIT scaled Happy Seeders (95 units, 2,420 trainings).
- 2021-25 (Integrated
Approach): Incentives + 2018 Scheme: 50% national residue reduction;
Punjab fires 1/5th of 2023 levels (Oct-Nov 2025). Bioenergy mandate (2023)
utilizes 5 Mt/yr. Yet, 2025 saw MP surges (+150%), offsetting northern
gains. Overall, policies reversed a 60% pre-2015 rise, halving emissions,
but full elimination unmet (target: 0% burning by 2024 via RGR).
Challenges and Limitations
- Adoption Barriers:
High costs (Happy Seeder: Rs. 5-7 lakh, even subsidized); pest/yield risks
(e.g., mulching issues); small farms (<2 ha) lack access (58% rent, but
uneven).
- Enforcement Gaps:
Fines low/untargeted (0.05% penalized); politicization; reversion
post-2018 due to adaptation.
- External Factors:
Short harvest windows, water scarcity favor burning; behavioral inertia
(e.g., ash for nutrients).
- Equity Issues:
Benefits skewed to larger Punjab farms; southern states lag due to less
focus.
Recommendations for Enhanced
Effectiveness
- Scale incentives:
Uniform bureaucrat targets could avert 4-7% child mortality; expand cash
transfers (14% reduction in pilots).
- Tech Integration:
GIS/satellite for real-time fines; AI for residue mapping.
- Holistic Push: 100%
short-duration paddy by 2030; biomass hubs for 20 Mt utilization.
- Monitoring: Annual DiD
evaluations; farmer co-ops for machinery sharing.
In conclusion, mitigation has transformed
stubble burning from unchecked (~85 Mt burned in 2010-11) to managed (~43 Mt in
2024-25), with machinery and incentives proving most effective (50-80% local
cuts). Sustained scaling could eliminate it by 2030, aligning with NDCs and
averting ~2 MtCO2e/yr
Thought for 25s
Note on Crop Residue Bioenergy Potential
in India (2010-11 vs. 2024-25)
Overview
Crop residues—primarily from rice, wheat,
sugarcane, maize, and pulses—represent a vast, underutilized renewable resource
in India, with significant potential for bioenergy production including biomass
power, ethanol, biogas, and pellets. Nationally, gross residue generation is
~696 Mt/year, of which ~228 Mt/year (33%) is surplus after accounting for
fodder, domestic fuel, and soil use, offering ~28 GW power potential or 1.4 EJ
ethanol equivalent. This could displace ~50-70 MtCO2e annually if fully harnessed,
reducing stubble burning (currently ~43 Mt burned) and fossil fuel imports.
Potential has grown modestly since 2010-11 (~242 Mt surplus then), driven by
20-30% higher crop yields, but utilization lags at <10% (e.g., 936 MW
biomass power capacity vs. 28 GW potential). Policies like 20% ethanol blending
(2025/26 target) and 7% biomass co-firing (2026) aim to unlock this, with solid
biomass powering 80% of projected growth to 2030. Southern/central states
contribute diversely (e.g., sugarcane in Maharashtra), but northern hotspots
(Punjab/UP) dominate rice-wheat residues.
Surplus Crop Residue Availability:
National and State-Wise
Surplus estimates use GIS-based models
(e.g., NIBE Atlas), deducting 20-40% for non-energy uses. 2024-25 data shows
stability vs. 2010-11, with slight shifts from diversification. Top 12
agricultural states (by production: UP, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, MP, Karnataka,
AP, Gujarat, TN, Bihar, WB, Telangana, Punjab/Haryana) generate ~75% of
surplus, led by cereals (52% national).
|
State |
2010-11 Surplus (Mt) |
2024-25 Surplus (Mt) |
% Change |
Key Crops (Mt, 2024-25) |
Power Potential (MW, 2024-25) |
|
Punjab |
~22.5 |
22.3 |
-1% |
Rice (18.8), Wheat (3.1) |
3,022 |
|
Haryana |
~11.0 |
10.9 |
-1% |
Rice (3.0), Wheat (2.0) |
1,353 |
|
UP |
~21.5 |
21.6 |
+1% |
Wheat (13.0), Sugarcane (2.2) |
2,800 |
|
Bihar |
~8.0 |
8.0 |
0% |
Rice (4.5), Maize (1.2) |
~1,000 (est.) |
|
Maharashtra |
~21.0 |
21.5 |
+2% |
Sugarcane (0.9), Wheat (0.6) |
2,630 |
|
TN |
~12.0 |
12.2 |
+2% |
Rice (3.1), Maize (2.1) |
1,560 |
|
AP |
~17.0 |
17.1 |
+1% |
Rice (2.6), Maize (2.4) |
2,000 |
|
Telangana |
~13.5 |
13.8 |
+2% |
Maize (2.4), Rice (1.4) |
1,678 |
|
MP |
~19.5 |
19.9 |
+2% |
Wheat (6.3), Maize (2.2) |
2,516 |
|
Rajasthan |
~10.5 |
10.2 |
-3% |
Wheat (4.1), Bajra (1.7) |
1,300 |
|
Karnataka |
~14.0 |
14.0 |
0% |
Maize (1.9), Sugarcane (1.5) |
1,794 |
|
WB |
~16.0 |
16.3 |
+2% |
Rice (12.3), Maize (0.8) |
1,742 |
|
National |
242 |
228.5 |
-6% |
Cereals (119), Sugarcane (6.4) |
28,446 |
Notes: 2010-11 from historical
surveys (e.g., 242 Mt total surplus, power ~25 GW est.); 2024-25 from NIBE
Atlas (key crops 70% of total). Bihar est. based on scaling; changes reflect
yield gains offset by better management. Top contributors: Punjab/UP ~20% national.
Bioenergy Forms and Potential
- Biomass
Power/Cogeneration: Surplus could yield 28 GW (at 0.12 MWh/t
efficiency), vs. current 936 MW (non-bagasse, Sep 2025). Co-firing
mandate: 7% in coal plants by 2026, utilizing ~5-10 Mt/year.
- Liquid Biofuels
(Ethanol): 1.4 EJ potential (~20 BL ethanol/year) from lignocellulosic
residues; current 0.1 EJ (6.35 BL, 2024). Targets: 20% blending (E20) by
2025/26, needing ~10 Mt residues.
- Biogas/Pellets:
~50 Mt/year for pellets (export potential USD 1-2 Bn); biogas from 20-30
Mt (e.g., 2-3 BCM/year). Horticulture adds 14.6 PJ thermal.
- Overall Energy:
4.15 EJ (2010-11) to ~4 EJ (2024-25), ~15-17% of primary energy needs.
Current Utilization vs. Potential
(Growth from 2010-11)
Utilization rose from <5% (2010-11: ~10
Mt used, 50 MW capacity) to ~8-10% (2024-25: ~20 Mt used, 936 MW + 5 Mt
co-firing). Market: USD 2.5 Bn (2024) to USD 4.3 Bn (2035, 5.2% CAGR). Gaps:
Logistics (70% loss in collection), tech (low efficiency), policy (subsidies
uneven).
|
Metric |
2010-11 |
2024-25 |
% Growth |
Notes |
|
Surplus Used (Mt) |
~10 |
~20 |
+100% |
Power (80%), ethanol (15%). |
|
Installed Capacity (MW) |
~50 (non-bagasse) |
936 |
+1,772% |
Total biomass ~10 GW incl. bagasse. |
|
Ethanol from Residues (BL) |
Negligible |
0.5 (est.) |
N/A |
Scaling to 10 BL by 2026. |
|
CO2 Savings (MtCO2e) |
~5 |
~15 |
+200% |
Vs. burning/fossil; full potential
50-70. |
Emissions and Environmental Benefits
Harnessing surplus avoids ~63 MtCO2 (from
avoided burning) + 100-150 MtCO2 (fossil displacement), plus PM2.5 cuts (260
kt/year). Per Mt residue: ~1.45 tCO2 saved in power vs. 1.4 tCO2 emitted if
burned. Net: Carbon-neutral cycle, soil health via biochar.
In summary, India's crop residue bioenergy
potential (~228 Mt surplus) offers scalable decarbonization, with northern
states key for immediate gains. Bridging utilization to 50% by 2030 requires
INR 10,000 Cr investment in supply chains, aligning with NDCs and reducing 20%
seasonal pollution.
Reference:
- Commission for Air
Quality Management (CAQM). (2025). Daily Stubble Fire Incident
Report: 15 Sep – 6 Nov 2025. Ministry of Environment, Forest and
Climate Change, Government of India.
- Gadde, B., Bonnet,
S., Menke, C., & Garivait, S. (2009). Air pollutant emissions from
rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environmental
Pollution, 157(5), 1554–1558.
- Jain, N., Bhatia,
A., & Pathak, H. (2014). Emission of air pollutants from crop
residue burning in India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14(2),
422–430.
- Indian Space
Research Organisation (ISRO). (2025). Bhuvan Crop Residue Burning
Portal – Fire Count Dashboard (2024-25). NRSC, Hyderabad.
- NASA FIRMS.
(2025). Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) –
MODIS/VIIRS Active Fire Data, India (Sep-Nov 2025). Earthdata, NASA.
- Punjab Pollution
Control Board (PPCB). (2025). Annual Report on Crop Residue
Management 2024-25. Government of Punjab.
- Ministry of New and
Renewable Energy (MNRE). (2025). Biomass Power & Cogeneration
Programme – Status Report 2025. Government of India.
- National Institute
for Bio-Energy (NIBE). (2024). GIS-Based Biomass Atlas of India –
2024 Update. MNRE, Government of India.
- Shyamsundar, P.,
Springer, N. P., Tallis, H., et al. (2019). Fields on fire:
Alternatives to crop residue burning in India. Science, 365(6453),
536–538.
- Central Pollution
Control Board (CPCB). (2024). National Ambient Air Quality Status
& Trend Report 2023-24. Ministry of Environment, Forest and
Climate Change.
- International
Energy Agency (IEA). (2025). India Energy Outlook 2025. Paris:
IEA.
- Ministry of
Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. (2025). Agricultural Statistics
at a Glance 2024. Government of India.
- Bhuvaneshwari, S.,
Hettiarachchi, H., & Meegoda, J. N. (2019). Crop residue burning
in India: Policy challenges and potential solutions. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5), 832.
- Gupta, P. K.,
Sahai, S., Singh, N., et al. (2004). Residue burning in rice–wheat
cropping system: Causes and implications. Current Science, 87(12),
1713–1717.
- National Green
Tribunal (NGT). (2015). Order in OA No. 118 of 2013 – Stubble
Burning Case. Principal Bench, New Delhi.
- Venkataraman, C.,
Habib, G., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., et al. (2005). Residential biofuels
in South Asia: Carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts. Science,
307(5714), 1454–1456.
- Kumar, P., Kumar,
S., & Joshi, L. (2015). Socioeconomic and Environmental
Implications of Agricultural Residue Burning. Springer Briefs in
Environmental Science.
- Andreae, M. O. (2019).
Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated
assessment. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(13), 8523–8546.
- IPCC. (2019). Refinement
to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories –
Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use.
- National Policy for
Management of Crop Residues (NPMCR). (2014). Ministry of Agriculture
& Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
- Crop Residue
Management Scheme. (2018). Guidelines under Sub-Mission on
Agricultural Mechanization (SMAM). Ministry of Agriculture.
- Reviving Green
Revolution (RGR) Cell. (2025). Annual Progress Report 2024-25.
Government of Tamil Nadu.
- HARIT Scheme.
(2019). Haryana Action for Residue Incorporation Technology –
Implementation Report. Government of Haryana.
- Singh, R. P., &
Kaskaoutis, D. G. (2014). Crop residue burning: A threat to South
Asian air quality. Eos, 95(37), 333–334.
- Ministry of Power.
(2023). National Policy on Biomass Co-firing in Thermal Power Plants
(Revised 2023). Government of India.
- NITI Aayog.
(2021). Bioenergy Roadmap for India: 2030 Vision. Government of
India.
- TERI. (2024). Assessment
of Biomass Supply Chain for Power Generation in India. The Energy and
Resources Institute.
- International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2025). Policy Brief:
Scaling Second-Generation Ethanol in India.
- FAO. (2023). Crop
Residue for Sustainable Agriculture – Global Assessment. Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- World Bank.
(2022). India: Managing Crop Residues for Clean Air and Bioenergy.
Washington, DC.
Comments
Post a Comment