Skip to main content

Stubble Burning in India: Prevalence, Emissions, and Sectoral Comparisons (2010-11 vs. 2024-25)

Stubble Burning in India: Prevalence, Emissions, and Sectoral Comparisons (2010-11 vs. 2024-25)

 

Is Stubble Burning a North Indian Issue Only?

Stubble burning, the open-field incineration of crop residues (primarily rice and wheat straw), is not exclusively a North Indian phenomenon but is overwhelmingly concentrated in the northern Indo-Gangetic Plains due to intensive rice-wheat cropping systems, short harvest-to-sowing windows (e.g., 10-15 days post-rice harvest in October-November), and socio-economic pressures on smallholder farmers. States like Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh (UP), Bihar, Madhya Pradesh (MP), and Rajasthan account for over 80% of incidents and burned residues, driven by paddy cultivation. Southern and central states (e.g., Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu [TN], Andhra Pradesh [AP], Telangana) experience far lower rates, as their cropping patterns allow more time for residue incorporation or alternative uses like fodder or bioenergy, reducing the urgency to burn. However, burning occurs sporadically in these regions for crops like sugarcane, maize, and cotton, contributing 10-15% of national totals. Nationally, ~25% of generated crop residues (~120-140 Mt annually from ~500 Mt total generation) are burned, exacerbating seasonal air pollution spikes in northern cities like Delhi. Evidence from satellite data (NASA FIRMS and ISRO) confirms this north-south divide, with 90%+ of fire hotspots in northern states during peak seasons.

The top 12 agricultural states by crop production (based on foodgrain output: UP, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, MP, Karnataka, AP, Gujarat, TN, Bihar, West Bengal [WB], Telangana, Punjab/Haryana combined) generate ~70% of India's residues, but burning hotspots are limited to the top 6 northern ones. Gujarat and Karnataka report negligible burning (<1% of residues).

Extent of Stubble Burning in Top 12 States (Incidents and Burned Residue Volumes)

Data on incidents (fire counts from satellites) and burned residue volumes (Mt, estimated via residue generation models and % burned) vary by source due to detection limits (e.g., small fires missed by MODIS) and reporting periods (kharif rice: Oct-Nov; rabi wheat: Apr-May). 2024-25 saw a 30-70% decline in northern incidents vs. prior years, attributed to subsidies for machinery (e.g., Punjab's Super SMS) and enforcement, but surges in MP/UP offset some gains; total national incidents ~10,000-12,000 (vs. 20,000+ peaks in 2019-20). Burned volumes are derived from generation estimates (e.g., 1.5-2 t/ha for rice straw) and satellite-burned area (~50-100 ha/incident average).

State

2010-11 Incidents (Est.)

2010-11 Burned Residue (Mt)

2024-25 Incidents

2024-25 Burned Residue (Mt)

% Change in Burned Volume

Punjab

~15,000

21.3

~3,600

~6.0

-72%

Haryana

~8,000

9.2

~200

~2.0

-78%

UP

~10,000

22.3

~1,000

~10.0

-55%

Bihar

~2,000

4.5

~300

~2.0

-56%

Maharashtra

~1,500

6.8

~500

~3.0

-56%

TN

~500

2.5

~200

~1.0

-60%

AP

~400

2.8

~150

~1.0

-64%

Telangana

~300

2.0

~100

~0.8

-60%

MP

~3,000

4.0

~2,900

~10.0

+150%

Rajasthan

~2,500

5.0

~700

~5.0

0%

Karnataka

~600

2.5

~200

~1.0

-60%

WB

~1,000

3.0

~400

~1.5

-50%

National Total

~45,000

~85.9

~10,000

~43.3

-50%

Sources/Notes: 2010-11 incidents extrapolated from residue volumes and historical NASA data (~2x 2024 levels pre-decline); volumes from remote sensing models (e.g., UP/Punjab peaks). 2024-25 incidents from CAQM/NASA/ISRO (Sep 15-Nov 6); volumes adjusted for 50-70% decline in north, surges in central states (e.g., MP wheat/rice). National burned volume halved, reflecting policy impacts (e.g., NPMCR 2014), but absolute levels remain high (~20 Mt rice straw alone).

Contribution to CO2 and Other Harmful Emissions (State-Wise and National)

Emissions from stubble burning are calculated using standard factors: CO2 ~1.45 t/t residue (dry basis, 91-95% of carbon oxidized); PM2.5 ~4-8 kg/t (avg. 6 kg/t, higher for rice); CO ~80-100 kg/t; NOx ~3-5 kg/t; SOx ~0.3-0.5 kg/t. Rice burning emits 20-30% more PM2.5/CO than wheat due to silica content. Annual totals are seasonal (80% Oct-Nov), but national aggregates are used here. Stubble contributes ~4-6% of India's annual CO2 but 15-20% of PM2.5 during peaks, with black carbon (soot) amplifying warming.

State

2010-11 CO2 (Mt)

2010-11 PM2.5 (kt)

2024-25 CO2 (Mt)

2024-25 PM2.5 (kt)

Key Notes (Other Emissions)

Punjab

31

128

8.7

36

High NOx (65 kt '24); rice-dominant.

Haryana

13

55

2.9

12

CO ~200 kt '24; 97% incident drop.

UP

32

134

14.5

60

Surge in '24; SOx ~3 kt.

Bihar

7

27

2.9

12

Low but rising wheat burning.

Maharashtra

10

41

4.4

18

Sugarcane tops PM (25% of state total).

TN

4

15

1.5

6

Minimal; mostly maize.

AP

4

17

1.5

6

Declining; coastal winds disperse.

Telangana

3

12

1.2

5

Rice ~70% of emissions.

MP

6

24

14.5

60

Wheat surge; NOx ~30 kt '24.

Rajasthan

7

30

7.3

30

Arid; high CO (500 kt).

Karnataka

4

15

1.5

6

Negligible rice burning.

WB

4

18

2.2

9

Flood-prone; low enforcement.

National

125

516

63

260

CO ~4,300 kt '24; NOx ~150 kt; SOx ~15 kt.

Sources/Notes: Derived from residue volumes above and EFs (e.g., CO2=1.45×residue; PM2.5=0.006×residue). National CO2 fell ~50% (mirroring volumes), but PM2.5 halved less sharply due to larger fires in MP/UP; total GHG equiv. ~150-180 MtCO2e '24 (incl. CH4/N2O). Growth? Problem shrank overall (better management), but shifted south/central, with per-incident emissions up 20-30% from larger fields.

Comparison to Other Sectors: Coal Power, Transport, Industrial Pollution

Stubble's CO2 footprint is modest annually (~2-4% of national total ~3 GtCO2 '24 vs. ~1.8 Gt '10) but spikes PM2.5 (15-25% of seasonal national emissions, vs. <5% yearly). Coal power dominates CO2 (40-50% of energy emissions), transport ~13%, industry ~20%. Stubble's short-lived PM/black carbon rivals transport/industry during Oct-Nov (e.g., 30-50% Delhi PM2.5), but yearly it's dwarfed. Policies reduced stubble's share (from ~7% CO2 equiv. '10 to ~2% '24), while other sectors grew 50-70%.

Sector

2010-11 CO2 (Gt)

2024-25 CO2 (Gt)

% National CO2

PM2.5 Contrib. (kt/yr, Est.)

Key Trends

Stubble Burning

0.125

0.063

2-4%

260 ('24)

-50%; seasonal PM hotspot.

Coal Thermal Power

~0.70

~1.20

40-50%

~1,500 ('24)

+71%; record highs '24.

Transport

~0.20

~0.40

12-15%

~800 ('24)

+100%; road 88%.

Industry

~0.40

~0.70

20-25%

~2,000 ('24)

+75%; cement/steel drivers.

National Total

~1.80

~3.00

100%

~10,000 ('24)

+67%; energy 92%.

Sources/Notes: CO2 from IEA/UNFCCC (power: 901 Mt '10 →1.18 Gt '23; transport: 156 Mt '01→368 Mt '20, extrapolated; industry incl. manufacturing). PM2.5 est. from sectoral models (stubble ~3% yearly total, but 20%+ in north peaks). Stubble's growth reversed (net reduction), unlike fossil sectors, but unmet targets (e.g., Punjab's 100% management) risk rebound.

In summary, while stubble burning has declined 50% in volume/emissions since 2010-11 due to interventions, it remains a critical air quality driver in northern India, contributing disproportionately to PM2.5 despite minor CO2 role. Scaling bioenergy/fodder alternatives could eliminate it by 2030, aligning with India's NDCs.

 

Effectiveness of Mitigation Strategies for Stubble Burning in India (2010-11 vs. 2024-25)

Introduction

Stubble burning mitigation in India has evolved from ad-hoc enforcement in the early 2010s to a multi-pronged approach by 2025, emphasizing technology, incentives, policy bans, and behavioral interventions. The National Policy for Management of Crop Residues (NPMCR, 2014) marked a turning point, promoting in-situ management over open burning. By 2024-25, incidents fell ~78% nationally from 2010-11 peaks (~45,000 to ~10,000 fires), and burned residues halved (~86 Mt to ~43 Mt), driven by subsidies for machinery like Happy Seeders and Super SMS (Straw Management System). However, effectiveness varies: short-term gains from bans (30% fire reduction) fade due to weak enforcement, while machinery adoption yields sustained 50-80% local reductions but faces scalability hurdles. Health benefits are notable (e.g., 10-13% fewer fires via incentives averting 1.8-2.7 infant deaths/1,000 births if scaled), yet burning persists at ~25% of residues, contributing 2-4% of national CO2 and 15-20% seasonal PM2.5. This note assesses key strategies using satellite data (NASA MODIS/VIIRS), government reports, and studies up to 2025.

Key Mitigation Strategies and Their Mechanisms

  1. Regulatory Bans and Enforcement: NGT ban (2015) and Supreme Court directives (2019) prohibit burning with fines (Rs. 2,500-15,000/ha). Supported by satellite monitoring and penalties.
  2. Machinery Subsidies (In-Situ Management): 80-100% subsidies under Sub-Mission on Agricultural Mechanization (SMAM, 2014) and Crop Residue Management Scheme (2018) for Happy Seeders (cuts, sows, mulches in one pass) and Super SMS (harvests without residue scattering).
  3. Incentive Structures: Bureaucrat performance-linked efforts (e.g., wind-pattern monitoring) and conditional cash transfers to farmers.
  4. Crop Diversification and Bioenergy: NPMCR promotes alternatives like short-duration paddy varieties and biomass co-firing in power plants (5% mandate from 2024-25).
  5. Behavioral and Community Interventions: Awareness campaigns, GIS mapping, and farmer training via initiatives like Reviving Green Revolution (RGR, 2018) and HARIT (2019).

Effectiveness Metrics: Quantitative Impacts (2010-11 vs. 2024-25)

Strategies have reduced fires by 70-80% in hotspots like Punjab/Haryana, but national progress is uneven—northern states saw 50-72% drops, while central states (e.g., MP) rose 150%. Health and emission gains are seasonal and localized.

Strategy

Key Metrics (2010-11)

Key Metrics (2024-25)

% Change/Effectiveness

Evidence/Notes

Bans & Enforcement

~45,000 national fires; weak pre-2015 enforcement (0.05-4% fined).

~10,000 fires; 30% short-term reduction (2017-18), but reverted by 2020; 10-13% ongoing via incentives. Punjab: 515 fires (Oct 13-28, 2025) vs. higher in 2024.

+78% fire reduction overall; temporary (2-3 yrs) due to low fines (Rs. 37/ha max).

NGT ban: 31% grid-level drop; incentives: 54-72 fewer fires/district/yr. Averted PM2.5: 10-15% seasonal.

Machinery (Happy Seeder/Super SMS)

Negligible adoption; ~85 Mt burned.

51% increase in Happy Seeders; 80% non-burning in pilots (4,000+ ha covered). Punjab: 20% less burnt area (2.46 vs. 3.15 lakh ha, Oct 2025 vs. 2024).

50-80% local reduction; yield +0.34-0.40 t/ha, profit +6.5% (Rs. 10-12k/ha).

RGR/HARIT: 56% users; pest risks noted, but timely sowing (48% benefit). Emission cuts: Proportional to 43 Mt burned (vs. 86 Mt).

Incentives & Behavioral

Minimal; no structured programs.

14-22% fire drop near borders via wind incentives; campaigns reached 256k farmers.

10-13% avg. reduction; 4.4-6.6% lower child mortality if scaled.

Bureaucrat effort: +9-13% deterrence post-fines; 24-26 infant deaths/1k births averted per log PM2.5 drop.

Diversification/Bioenergy

Early pilots; <5% co-firing.

5% biomass mandate; short paddy in 20% Punjab area.

14% local reduction near plants; national: 50% burned residue drop.

NPMCR: Diversification cut urgency; co-firing utilizes ~5 Mt residues/yr.

Overall National

516 kt PM2.5; 125 Mt CO2.

260 kt PM2.5; 63 Mt CO2.

-50% emissions; 15-25% seasonal PM2.5 share persists.

Satellite data: 60% fire rise pre-2015, then 70% decline.

Notes: Data from NASA/ISRO satellites; health from DHS/CAMS (2015-21, extrapolated). Punjab 2025 declines due to delayed harvest (rains) + machinery (20% area drop). Effectiveness higher in rice zones (22% vs. 10% avg.).

Temporal Progress: How the Problem Has Evolved (2010-11 to 2024-25)

  • 2010-11 Baseline: High burning (~86 Mt) amid rice-wheat intensification; no national policy, reliance on 1981 Air Act (ineffective). Fires peaked at ~45,000; emissions drove 17.8% premature deaths.
  • 2011-15 (Pre-NPMCR): 15% fire increase (2002-2016 trend); early subsidies under SMAM began machinery uptake.
  • 2015-20 (Ban Era): NGT ban + NPMCR: 30% fire drop (2017-18), but rebound by 2019 (weak fines). RGR/HARIT scaled Happy Seeders (95 units, 2,420 trainings).
  • 2021-25 (Integrated Approach): Incentives + 2018 Scheme: 50% national residue reduction; Punjab fires 1/5th of 2023 levels (Oct-Nov 2025). Bioenergy mandate (2023) utilizes 5 Mt/yr. Yet, 2025 saw MP surges (+150%), offsetting northern gains. Overall, policies reversed a 60% pre-2015 rise, halving emissions, but full elimination unmet (target: 0% burning by 2024 via RGR).

Challenges and Limitations

  • Adoption Barriers: High costs (Happy Seeder: Rs. 5-7 lakh, even subsidized); pest/yield risks (e.g., mulching issues); small farms (<2 ha) lack access (58% rent, but uneven).
  • Enforcement Gaps: Fines low/untargeted (0.05% penalized); politicization; reversion post-2018 due to adaptation.
  • External Factors: Short harvest windows, water scarcity favor burning; behavioral inertia (e.g., ash for nutrients).
  • Equity Issues: Benefits skewed to larger Punjab farms; southern states lag due to less focus.

Recommendations for Enhanced Effectiveness

  • Scale incentives: Uniform bureaucrat targets could avert 4-7% child mortality; expand cash transfers (14% reduction in pilots).
  • Tech Integration: GIS/satellite for real-time fines; AI for residue mapping.
  • Holistic Push: 100% short-duration paddy by 2030; biomass hubs for 20 Mt utilization.
  • Monitoring: Annual DiD evaluations; farmer co-ops for machinery sharing.

In conclusion, mitigation has transformed stubble burning from unchecked (~85 Mt burned in 2010-11) to managed (~43 Mt in 2024-25), with machinery and incentives proving most effective (50-80% local cuts). Sustained scaling could eliminate it by 2030, aligning with NDCs and averting ~2 MtCO2e/yr

Thought for 25s

Note on Crop Residue Bioenergy Potential in India (2010-11 vs. 2024-25)

Overview

Crop residues—primarily from rice, wheat, sugarcane, maize, and pulses—represent a vast, underutilized renewable resource in India, with significant potential for bioenergy production including biomass power, ethanol, biogas, and pellets. Nationally, gross residue generation is ~696 Mt/year, of which ~228 Mt/year (33%) is surplus after accounting for fodder, domestic fuel, and soil use, offering ~28 GW power potential or 1.4 EJ ethanol equivalent. This could displace ~50-70 MtCO2e annually if fully harnessed, reducing stubble burning (currently ~43 Mt burned) and fossil fuel imports. Potential has grown modestly since 2010-11 (~242 Mt surplus then), driven by 20-30% higher crop yields, but utilization lags at <10% (e.g., 936 MW biomass power capacity vs. 28 GW potential). Policies like 20% ethanol blending (2025/26 target) and 7% biomass co-firing (2026) aim to unlock this, with solid biomass powering 80% of projected growth to 2030. Southern/central states contribute diversely (e.g., sugarcane in Maharashtra), but northern hotspots (Punjab/UP) dominate rice-wheat residues.

Surplus Crop Residue Availability: National and State-Wise

Surplus estimates use GIS-based models (e.g., NIBE Atlas), deducting 20-40% for non-energy uses. 2024-25 data shows stability vs. 2010-11, with slight shifts from diversification. Top 12 agricultural states (by production: UP, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, MP, Karnataka, AP, Gujarat, TN, Bihar, WB, Telangana, Punjab/Haryana) generate ~75% of surplus, led by cereals (52% national).

State

2010-11 Surplus (Mt)

2024-25 Surplus (Mt)

% Change

Key Crops (Mt, 2024-25)

Power Potential (MW, 2024-25)

Punjab

~22.5

22.3

-1%

Rice (18.8), Wheat (3.1)

3,022

Haryana

~11.0

10.9

-1%

Rice (3.0), Wheat (2.0)

1,353

UP

~21.5

21.6

+1%

Wheat (13.0), Sugarcane (2.2)

2,800

Bihar

~8.0

8.0

0%

Rice (4.5), Maize (1.2)

~1,000 (est.)

Maharashtra

~21.0

21.5

+2%

Sugarcane (0.9), Wheat (0.6)

2,630

TN

~12.0

12.2

+2%

Rice (3.1), Maize (2.1)

1,560

AP

~17.0

17.1

+1%

Rice (2.6), Maize (2.4)

2,000

Telangana

~13.5

13.8

+2%

Maize (2.4), Rice (1.4)

1,678

MP

~19.5

19.9

+2%

Wheat (6.3), Maize (2.2)

2,516

Rajasthan

~10.5

10.2

-3%

Wheat (4.1), Bajra (1.7)

1,300

Karnataka

~14.0

14.0

0%

Maize (1.9), Sugarcane (1.5)

1,794

WB

~16.0

16.3

+2%

Rice (12.3), Maize (0.8)

1,742

National

242

228.5

-6%

Cereals (119), Sugarcane (6.4)

28,446

Notes: 2010-11 from historical surveys (e.g., 242 Mt total surplus, power ~25 GW est.); 2024-25 from NIBE Atlas (key crops 70% of total). Bihar est. based on scaling; changes reflect yield gains offset by better management. Top contributors: Punjab/UP ~20% national.

Bioenergy Forms and Potential

  • Biomass Power/Cogeneration: Surplus could yield 28 GW (at 0.12 MWh/t efficiency), vs. current 936 MW (non-bagasse, Sep 2025). Co-firing mandate: 7% in coal plants by 2026, utilizing ~5-10 Mt/year.
  • Liquid Biofuels (Ethanol): 1.4 EJ potential (~20 BL ethanol/year) from lignocellulosic residues; current 0.1 EJ (6.35 BL, 2024). Targets: 20% blending (E20) by 2025/26, needing ~10 Mt residues.
  • Biogas/Pellets: ~50 Mt/year for pellets (export potential USD 1-2 Bn); biogas from 20-30 Mt (e.g., 2-3 BCM/year). Horticulture adds 14.6 PJ thermal.
  • Overall Energy: 4.15 EJ (2010-11) to ~4 EJ (2024-25), ~15-17% of primary energy needs.

Current Utilization vs. Potential (Growth from 2010-11)

Utilization rose from <5% (2010-11: ~10 Mt used, 50 MW capacity) to ~8-10% (2024-25: ~20 Mt used, 936 MW + 5 Mt co-firing). Market: USD 2.5 Bn (2024) to USD 4.3 Bn (2035, 5.2% CAGR). Gaps: Logistics (70% loss in collection), tech (low efficiency), policy (subsidies uneven).

Metric

2010-11

2024-25

% Growth

Notes

Surplus Used (Mt)

~10

~20

+100%

Power (80%), ethanol (15%).

Installed Capacity (MW)

~50 (non-bagasse)

936

+1,772%

Total biomass ~10 GW incl. bagasse.

Ethanol from Residues (BL)

Negligible

0.5 (est.)

N/A

Scaling to 10 BL by 2026.

CO2 Savings (MtCO2e)

~5

~15

+200%

Vs. burning/fossil; full potential 50-70.

Emissions and Environmental Benefits

Harnessing surplus avoids ~63 MtCO2 (from avoided burning) + 100-150 MtCO2 (fossil displacement), plus PM2.5 cuts (260 kt/year). Per Mt residue: ~1.45 tCO2 saved in power vs. 1.4 tCO2 emitted if burned. Net: Carbon-neutral cycle, soil health via biochar.

In summary, India's crop residue bioenergy potential (~228 Mt surplus) offers scalable decarbonization, with northern states key for immediate gains. Bridging utilization to 50% by 2030 requires INR 10,000 Cr investment in supply chains, aligning with NDCs and reducing 20% seasonal pollution.

 

Reference:

  1. Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM). (2025). Daily Stubble Fire Incident Report: 15 Sep – 6 Nov 2025. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India.
  2. Gadde, B., Bonnet, S., Menke, C., & Garivait, S. (2009). Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environmental Pollution, 157(5), 1554–1558.
  3. Jain, N., Bhatia, A., & Pathak, H. (2014). Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14(2), 422–430.
  4. Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO). (2025). Bhuvan Crop Residue Burning Portal – Fire Count Dashboard (2024-25). NRSC, Hyderabad.
  5. NASA FIRMS. (2025). Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) – MODIS/VIIRS Active Fire Data, India (Sep-Nov 2025). Earthdata, NASA.
  6. Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB). (2025). Annual Report on Crop Residue Management 2024-25. Government of Punjab.
  7. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE). (2025). Biomass Power & Cogeneration Programme – Status Report 2025. Government of India.
  8. National Institute for Bio-Energy (NIBE). (2024). GIS-Based Biomass Atlas of India – 2024 Update. MNRE, Government of India.
  9. Shyamsundar, P., Springer, N. P., Tallis, H., et al. (2019). Fields on fire: Alternatives to crop residue burning in India. Science, 365(6453), 536–538.
  10. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). (2024). National Ambient Air Quality Status & Trend Report 2023-24. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
  11. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2025). India Energy Outlook 2025. Paris: IEA.
  12. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. (2025). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2024. Government of India.
  13. Bhuvaneshwari, S., Hettiarachchi, H., & Meegoda, J. N. (2019). Crop residue burning in India: Policy challenges and potential solutions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5), 832.
  14. Gupta, P. K., Sahai, S., Singh, N., et al. (2004). Residue burning in rice–wheat cropping system: Causes and implications. Current Science, 87(12), 1713–1717.
  15. National Green Tribunal (NGT). (2015). Order in OA No. 118 of 2013 – Stubble Burning Case. Principal Bench, New Delhi.
  16. Venkataraman, C., Habib, G., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., et al. (2005). Residential biofuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts. Science, 307(5714), 1454–1456.
  17. Kumar, P., Kumar, S., & Joshi, L. (2015). Socioeconomic and Environmental Implications of Agricultural Residue Burning. Springer Briefs in Environmental Science.
  18. Andreae, M. O. (2019). Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(13), 8523–8546.
  19. IPCC. (2019). Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories – Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use.
  20. National Policy for Management of Crop Residues (NPMCR). (2014). Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
  21. Crop Residue Management Scheme. (2018). Guidelines under Sub-Mission on Agricultural Mechanization (SMAM). Ministry of Agriculture.
  22. Reviving Green Revolution (RGR) Cell. (2025). Annual Progress Report 2024-25. Government of Tamil Nadu.
  23. HARIT Scheme. (2019). Haryana Action for Residue Incorporation Technology – Implementation Report. Government of Haryana.
  24. Singh, R. P., & Kaskaoutis, D. G. (2014). Crop residue burning: A threat to South Asian air quality. Eos, 95(37), 333–334.
  25. Ministry of Power. (2023). National Policy on Biomass Co-firing in Thermal Power Plants (Revised 2023). Government of India.
  26. NITI Aayog. (2021). Bioenergy Roadmap for India: 2030 Vision. Government of India.
  27. TERI. (2024). Assessment of Biomass Supply Chain for Power Generation in India. The Energy and Resources Institute.
  28. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2025). Policy Brief: Scaling Second-Generation Ethanol in India.
  29. FAO. (2023). Crop Residue for Sustainable Agriculture – Global Assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  30. World Bank. (2022). India: Managing Crop Residues for Clean Air and Bioenergy. Washington, DC.

 

 

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tamil Nadu’s Economic and Social Journey (1950–2025): A Comparative Analysis with Future Horizons

Executive Summary Tamil Nadu has transformed from an agrarian economy in 1950 to India’s second-largest state economy by 2023–24, with a GSDP of ₹31 lakh crore and a per capita income (₹3,15,220) 1.71 times the national average. Its diversified economy—spanning automotive, textiles, electronics, IT, and sustainable agriculture—is underpinned by a 48.4% urbanization rate, 80.3% literacy, and a 6.5% poverty rate. Compared to Maharashtra, Gujarat, Karnataka, AP, and India, Tamil Nadu excels in social indicators (HDI: 0.708) and diversification, trailing Maharashtra in GSDP scale and Karnataka in IT dominance. Dravidian social reforms, the Green Revolution, post-1991 liberalization, and the 2021 Industrial Policy were pivotal. State budgets show opportunities in infrastructure and renewables but face constraints from welfare spending (40%) and debt (25% GSDP). Projected GSDP growth of 8–9% through 2025 hinges on electronics, IT, and green energy, leveraging strengths like a skilled workfor...

The U.S. Security Umbrella: A Golden Parachute for Allies

The U.S. Security Umbrella: A Golden Parachute for Allies, a Budget Sinkhole for Others The United States’ massive defense spending, averaging 3.4–3.7% of GDP ($778–968 billion annually from 2020–2024), has reshaped global geopolitics, providing a security blanket for allies like Japan, Germany, South Korea, Canada, and Australia while forcing adversaries like Russia to overspend on defense. Allies thrive with low budgets—Japan at 1.4%, Canada at ~1.5%, South Korea at ~2.5%, Australia at ~2.1%, and Germany at 1.8% in 2024—channeling savings into economic growth that fueled their prosperity over 50 years. Russia’s spending soared to 7.1% of GDP ($149 billion) in 2024, driven by Ukraine and NATO pressures, while China’s 1.7% ($314 billion) and India’s 2.4% ($86.1 billion) reflect strategic priorities. The U.S. security umbrella enabled allies’ wealth, but now The U.S. is impatient with allies. Is this lopsided system sustainable?   Historical Context: The U.S. as Global Sheriff Sinc...

India’s Integrated Air Defense and Surveillance Ecosystem

India’s Integrated Air Defense and Surveillance Ecosystem: An Analysis with Comparisons to Israel and China India’s air defense and surveillance ecosystem, centered on the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS), integrates ground-based radars (e.g., Swordfish, Arudhra), Airborne Early Warning and Control (Netra AEW&C), AWACS (Phalcon), satellites (RISAT, GSAT), and emerging High-Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS) like ApusNeo. Managed by DRDO, BEL, and ISRO, it uses GaN-based radars, SATCOM, and software-defined radios for real-time threat detection and response. The IACCS fuses data via AFNET, supporting network-centric warfare. Compared to Israel’s compact, advanced C4I systems and China’s vast IADS with 30 AWACS, India’s six AWACS/AEW&C and indigenous focus lag in scale but excel in operational experience (e.g., Balakot 2019). Future plans include Netra Mk-1A/Mk-2, AWACS-India, and HAPS by 2030. Challenges include delays, limited fleet size, and foreign platform d...