Zoroastrianism
and Hinduism – From Proto-Indo-Iranian Unity to the Gāthās-Rigveda Schism
A single Bronze-Age people once
kindled one fire, pressed one sacred plant, and sang to one sky. Around 2000
BCE, the Indo-Iranians split—some toward the Indus, others toward the Iranian
Plateau. Their gods—Mitra, Varuna, Vāyu, Agni/Atar—travelled with them, as did
the cosmic law Ṛta/Asha and the intoxicating Soma/Haoma. Then came Zarathushtra
(c. 1200–1000 BCE), a lone voice in the wilderness. In 17 Gāthās (238
stanzas), he flipped the pantheon: Devas became Daevas, Ahura Mazda reigned
alone, and ritual was moralised into Good Thoughts-Words-Deeds. Across the
mountains, ṛṣis poured 1,028 Rigvedic hymns (10,600 stanzas) to a
thousand gods. Linguistically twinned (ahmi = asmi), metrically parallel,
thematically braided—fire, waters, truth—they diverged into ethical monotheism
versus mythic pluralism. Zoroastrianism crowned Sasanian Persia (10–20 million,
4th–6th c. CE), crumbled after 651 CE, and endures in ~120,000 Parsis. Hinduism
bloomed under the Guptas. Dragon-slaying, purity rites, and the unbreakable
Asha-Ṛta axis prove one ancestral soul fractured into twin flames still burning
across millennia.
1. Dawn on the Steppe: The Proto-Indo-Iranian Cradle (c.
2500–1800 BCE)
Imagine a vast grassland under a boundless sky. Bronze
chariots gleam beside corralled horses. Around a blazing fire, a priest pours
milk into the flames while another presses a golden plant through wool. The
smoke rises to gods whose names will echo for millennia: Mitra, guardian
of sunrise covenants; Varuna, all-seeing upholder of cosmic law; Vāyu,
breath of the storm; Atar, the fire itself; Haoma, the pressed
elixir of vision.
This is the Proto-Indo-Iranian world—archaeologically
anchored in the Sintashta culture (2100 BCE) and its Andronovo successors.
Horse sacrifices here prefigure the Vedic Aśvamedha and Zoroastrian Yasna.
J.P. Mallory captures the unity: “The Indo-Iranians were a single cultural
continuum before geography and ideology tore them asunder.”
Their language, a melodic ancestor of both Avestan and
Sanskrit, carried the seed of sacred verse. Boghazkoi tablets from distant
Anatolia (1400 BCE) seal a treaty with Mitra-Varuna-Indra-Nasatya—proof
the gods were already on the move.
2. The Great Parting: Rivers of Mankind Diverge (c.
1800–1200 BCE)
Two currents flow from the steppe spring. One crosses the
Hindu Kush into the lush Punjab, where monsoon rains drum on thatched roofs and
ṛṣis begin to sing of dawns and rivers. The other settles the arid Iranian
Plateau, where wind-sculpted deserts demand a fiercer faith.
Physical separation widens linguistic cracks:
Proto-Indo-Iranian s softens to Avestan h (sapta → hapta
= seven). Yet the core remains: fire altars, pressed plant, sky gods. Asko
Parpola reflects: “The schism was post-migration; before Zarathushtra,
differences were dialectical.”
In this shared world, gods drink, fight, and forgive. Cattle
raids are holy; blood on the altar, acceptable. The old religion tolerates
ambiguity—until a prophet steps forward to demand clarity.
3. Zarathushtra’s Solitary Flame: The Prophet Ignites a
Revolution (c. 1200–1000 BCE)
Picture a man alone at dawn, fire crackling, voice rising in
Old Avestan meter:
“I who would weave my songs for You, O Mazda, as a skilled
poet…” (Yasna 28.1)
He is Zarathushtra—zaotar, pourer of libations,
yet pouring scorn on the old pantheon. Prods Oktor Skjærvø listens across the
centuries: “If you recite Yasna 28.1 and Rigveda 10.129 side by side, a
bilingual speaker hears one voice split by a mountain range.”
His revolution is surgical, threefold:
- Monotheism: Ahura Mazda alone is uncreated;
all else, creation.
- Ethical Dualism: Spenta Mainyu (Bounteous
Spirit) versus Angra Mainyu (Destructive Spirit)—free will is the hinge of
existence.
- Moralised Ritual: Fire endures, but blood
yields to Good Thoughts, Words, Deeds.
The inversion is breathtaking:
- Deva (shining god) → Daeva (demon)
- Asura (ambiguous lord) → Ahura (sole
Lord)
- Indra, slayer of Vṛtra → Indra, chief
of Daevas
Helmut Humbach sees the method: “Zarathushtra did not
invent gods; he reclassified them.” In 17 Gāthās—five meters
descending from the 100-stanza Ahunavaiti to the 9-stanza Vahishto
Ishti—he builds a liturgical staircase toward ethical silence.
4. The Gāthās: 238 Stanzas of Prophetic Thunder – A
Verse-by-Verse Journey
Night falls over the eastern Iranian highlands. A single fire
crackles in a stone-ringed enclosure. Zarathushtra—exiled, persecuted, yet
undaunted—lifts his voice in the Ahunavaiti Gāthā, the longest and most
architectonic of the five sections. Its 100 stanzas in seven hymns form the
theological foundation: creation, the primal choice, the Amesha Spentas as
divine attributes.
“I ask You, O Ahura, truly: What is the origin of the best
existence?” (Yasna 29.1)
Here, the Cow-Soul—symbol of pastoral life and ethical
care—cries out against the violence of the old Daeva-worshippers.
Zarathushtra’s answer is radical: Asha (truth/righteousness) must govern
not just cosmos but cattle, not just sky but society.
The Ushtavaiti Gāthā (66 stanzas, four hymns) shifts to
joy: ushta means “happiness.” Yasna 43 sings of the vision of Mazda—a
theophany where the prophet beholds the divine in fire and light:
“I beheld You, O Mazda, as the First, at the birth of
existence…” (Yasna 43.5)
Almut Hintze unpacks the progression: “The ascending
complexity (100 → 9 stanzas) mirrors a liturgical crescendo toward silence.”
The Spenta Mainyu Gāthā (41 stanzas) introduces the Bounteous Spirit as
co-eternal with Mazda, a nuanced dualism within unity.
The Vohu Khshathra Gāthā (22 stanzas) envisions a
kingdom of Good Dominion, where truth rules human affairs. Finally, the Vahishto
Ishti Gāthā (9 stanzas, Yasna 53) ends with a wedding hymn—Zarathushtra’s
daughter Pouruchista marries Jamaspa, symbolising the union of wisdom and
action.
Stephanie Jamison contrasts the intimacy: “The Gāthās are
prophetic autobiography; the Rigveda is tribal anthology.” Each stanza is a
personal plea, a philosophical argument, a liturgical act. The Ahuna Vairya
prayer—recited before every Yasna—encapsulates the entire theology in 21 words:
“As is the will of the Lord, so is the priestly power…”
Linguistically, the Gāthās preserve archaic dual forms
(vohū manahī = “two good minds”) and subjunctive verbs that
mirror Rigvedic usage. The meter—syllabic, not accentual—demands breath
control; priests train for years to chant without error.
The Gāthās are not merely poetry; they are revelation in
real time. Zarathushtra questions, doubts, exults:
“This I ask You, tell me truly, O Ahura—whether I shall
earn the reward…” (Yasna 33.11)
No Vedic ṛṣi speaks with such urgency. The Gāthās are the first
philosophical monologue in human history.
5. The Rigveda: 10,600 Stanzas of Cosmic Symphony – A Maṇḍala-by-Maṇḍala
Exploration
Dawn breaks over the Sarasvati River. A circle of ṛṣis—bearded,
eyes closed—chants in perfect unison:
“Agni, the chosen priest, God, minister of sacrifice, the
hotar who brings the gods…” (RV 1.1.1)
The Rigveda is not a book but a living soundscape—1,028
hymns, 10,600 stanzas, eight meters, ten maṇḍalas. Frits Staal hears the
mechanism: “Meter was mnemonic armor—without writing, rhythm preserved
revelation.”
The Core Family Books (Maṇḍalas 2–7)
These ~400 hymns form the ancient nucleus, attributed
to seven ṛṣi clans:
- Gṛtsamada (Maṇḍala 2): Hymns to Indra’s valor.
- Viśvāmitra (Maṇḍala 3): The Gāyatrī mantra (RV
3.62.10).
- Vasiṣṭha (Maṇḍala 7): Dialogues with Varuna,
including the famous “I am Manu, I am Soma” (7.7.1).
The Outer Rings (Maṇḍalas 1, 8–10)
Later compositions, ~600 hymns, expand the cosmos:
- Maṇḍala 1: Cosmological hymns, including the
Nāsadīya Sūkta (10.129): “Then there was neither existence nor
non-existence…”
- Maṇḍala 9: 114 Soma Pavamana hymns—pure
ecstasy: “Flow, O Soma, for Indra to drink!” (9.1.1)
- Maṇḍala 10: Philosophical peaks—the Puruṣa
Sūkta (10.90), funeral hymns, and the Dānastuti (praise of
patrons).
The Triṣṭubh meter (11 syllables × 4) dominates warrior
hymns; Gāyatrī (8×3) carries dawn prayers. The ninth maṇḍala is a
Soma symphony—114 hymns to the golden drops filtered through wool, mixed
with milk, offered to Indra who swells “like the ocean.”
The Rigveda is polyphonic: Indra thunders in 250 hymns;
Agni blazes in 200; Soma flows in 120. Varuna’s moral gaze appears in 50. The
gods are personae of nature—storm, fire, sun, dawn—yet also psychological
forces.
The Dānastuti passages name historical kings—Sudās,
Divodāsa—anchoring myth in memory. The Rigveda is not just theology; it is tribal
memory, cosmic map, ritual script.
|
The Avesta (Zoroastrian canon) and Vedas (Hindu
foundation) are sister scriptures in Old Avestan and Vedic Sanskrit—dialects
so close that ahmi = asmi (“I am”). Born from Proto-Indo-Iranian unity (c.
2000 BCE), they share fire rituals, Soma/Haoma, cosmic order (Asha/Ṛta), and
dragon-slaying myths. Yet Zarathushtra’s reform (c. 1200 BCE) inverted the
pantheon: Devas → Daevas (demons), Ahura Mazda supreme. The Gāthās (17 hymns,
238 stanzas) are prophetic theology; Rigveda (1,028 hymns, 10,600 stanzas) is
polytheistic liturgy. Yasna = Yajña; Yazata = Yajata (worthy of worship).
Avesta is smaller, priest-centric, ethical; Vedas are vast, bardic, mythic.
Both transmitted orally for centuries, codified late (Avesta 5th c. CE; Vedas
Gupta era). Fire altars, purity laws, and metered verse prove one ancestral
voice—split by a prophet’s fire into monotheistic clarity and polytheistic
wonder. “Recite Yasna 28.1 beside Rigveda 10.129—you hear
one voice across a mountain pass.” — Prods Oktor Skjærvø, The Spirit of
Zoroastrianism (2011) “The Gāthās are prophetic monologue; the
Rigveda is tribal anthology.” — Stephanie Jamison, The Rig Veda
(2014) Gāthās: Zarathushtra’s dialogue with Ahura
Mazda—creation, choice, judgment. Rigveda: ṛṣis praise Indra (250
hymns), Agni (200), Soma (120). Yasna is internalized yajña—same fire, new
heart.” — Michael
Stausberg, Zoroastrian Rituals (2004) Yasna = 72 chapters recited daily; Yajña =
multi-day spectacles (Aśvamedha). “Zarathushtra did not abolish gods; he reclassified
them.” — Helmut Humbach, The Gāthās (1991) “Asha and Ṛta are the same word, the same soul.” —
Hanns-Peter Schmidt, Ṛta and Aša (1968) “Soma and Haoma are ritual twins—one plant, two
destinies.” — Harry Falk, Bulletin of SOAS (1989) “Fire is the visible face of divinity in both;
pollution is sacrilege.” — Jamsheed Choksy, Purity and Pollution (1989) “Both survived by human hard drives—the priest’s
throat was the first library.” — Sheldon Pollock, The Language of the Gods
(2006) Stand between a Parsi agiyari and a Vedic hom—the
fire is the same. One script in Avestan, one in Devanagari, yet the flame
speaks one language. The Avesta is Zarathushtra’s solitary cry for
moral clarity; the Vedas are a thousand ṛṣis singing cosmic wonder.
One inverts gods into demons; the other crowns them in soma. The Gāthās ask: “Whom do you choose?”
The Rigveda answers: “All this is Agni!” Not rivals—complementary
breaths. The Avesta’s ethical fire forged Abrahamic urgency; the Vedas’
mythic river nourished a billion hearts. In 17 Gāthās, one prophet moralised cattle; in
10,600 stanzas, ṛṣis militarised dawn. Yet both press the same plant, slay
the same dragon, guard the same truth (Asha/Ṛta). The Magi’s chains and
Brahmin pāṭhas conquered time through human throats. Today, a Parsi recites Yasna 28; a Tamil Brahmin
chants RV 1.1. Same cadence, same reverence. The Indo-Iranian soul did not
break; it multiplied. In an age of digital noise, both remind us: truth
is sung, not scrolled. The fire still burns. The waters still flow. And
in every dawn hymn, every purity rite, every pressed stalk, the ancient voice
whispers: truth has many names, but order is one. |
6. Linguistic Intimacy: One Tongue, Two Destinies – A
Lexical Deep Dive
Listen closely to the echo:
|
Avestan |
Vedic |
Meaning |
Context |
|
ahmi |
asmi |
“I
am” |
Zarathushtra’s
self-assertion (Y. 28.1) vs. ṛṣi’s (RV 10.125.1) |
|
aṣ̌a |
ṛta |
“truth/order” |
Cosmic
law (Y. 31.8) vs. seasonal rhythm (RV 1.1.8) |
|
haoma |
soma |
“pressed
plant” |
Purity
ritual (Y. 10.1) vs. ecstatic vision (RV 9.1.1) |
|
vohu
manah |
vasu
manas |
“good
mind” |
Amesha
Spenta (Y. 28.1) vs. generous thought (RV 10.117.7) |
|
xᵛaētu |
śveta |
“white” |
Purity
symbol (Y. 51.1) vs. dawn (RV 1.113.1) |
The phonetic shift s → h is the only
veil: sapta → hapta (“seven”), sūrya → hvar (“sun”).
Karl Hoffmann’s analysis reveals identical grammar: dual number (vohū
manahī = “two good minds”), ablative case (mazdāo = mazdāt),
subjunctive mood (vāurayā = varayāt).
Harry Falk presses the plant: “Soma and Haoma are ritual
twins—one plant, two destinies.” The ephedra or pomegranate
debate aside, the ritual is identical: nine ingredients, wool filter, milk
admixture. The linguistic DNA is undeniable.
7. Asha = Ṛta: The Unbreakable Spine of the Cosmos –
Philosophical and Ritual Depth
“Through Asha, Mazda gives prosperity.” (Yasna 43.5) “Agni,
through Ṛta, you shine.” (RV 1.1.8)
Hanns-Peter Schmidt feels the pulse: “Asha and Ṛta are the
same word, the same idea, the same soul.”
Cosmological Role
- Ṛta: Seasons turn, sun rises, rivers flow. RV
10.85.1: “Ṛta sustains the sun in the sky.”
- Asha: Truth clothes Mazda’s creations. Y.
31.8: “Asha is the best good.”
Moral Imperative
- Ṛta: Oaths bind, sacrifices work. RV 7.7.1: “Varuna
knows the paths of Ṛta.”
- Asha: Choice between truth and lie. Y. 30.3: “The
two spirits came together…”
Ritual Expression
- Ṛta: Yajña aligns human action with cosmic
order.
- Asha: Yasna purifies thought before act.
The opposition is identical: anṛta (untruth) = druj
(lie). The consequence is universal: breach brings chaos—drought,
defeat, death.
8. Fire and Elixir: The Shared Altar – Ritual Mechanics and
Symbolism
The fire is the same—three Vedic fires (gārhapatya,
āhavaniya, dakṣiṇa), one eternal Zoroastrian Atash Behram. Michael
Stausberg watches the transformation: “The Yasna is internalized yajña—same
fire, new heart.”
Fire (Atar/Agni)
- Rigveda: Agni is priest, poet, god. RV
1.1.1: “Agni, the chosen priest…” 200 hymns praise his tongues.
- Gāthās: Atar is son of Mazda, symbol of
purity. Y. 31.3: “Atar, the most beautiful of Mazda’s creations.”
Elixir (Haoma/Soma)
- Rigveda: Soma is filtered, mixed, drunk.
RV 9.1.1: “Flow, O Soma, for Indra to drink!” Ninth maṇḍala is a
114-hymn Soma symphony.
- Gāthās: Haoma is pressed, offered, not
drunk. Y. 10.1: “We press you for purity, O Haoma.” Zarathushtra
demotes its ecstatic role.
Jamsheed Choksy guards the flame: “Fire is the visible face
of divinity in both traditions; pollution is sacrilege.” The ritual
mechanics are identical: sandalwood, ghee, milk, mantras. The symbolism
diverges: Vedic fire consumes; Zoroastrian fire purifies.
9. Dragon-Slaying: The Hero’s Eternal Quest – Mythic
Structure and Social Function
Thunder cracks.
- Indra shatters Vṛtra’s 99 forts; waters burst
forth (RV 1.32).
- Thraetaona cleaves Aži Dahāka’s three heads;
rivers flow (Yasht 19).
Calvert Watkins hears the archetype: “Indo-Iranian
chaoskampf motif—hero releases waters.”
Mythic Structure
- Chaos Monster: Vṛtra (coiled serpent) = Aži
Dahāka (three-headed dragon).
- Hero: Indra (thunderbolt) = Thraetaona (mace).
- Stakes: Drought vs. fertility.
- Outcome: Waters released, order restored.
Social Function
- Vedic: Indra’s victory justifies cattle
raids and tribal expansion.
- Avestan: Thraetaona’s triumph foreshadows Frashokereti—final
defeat of evil.
The serpent is older than the schism; the hero
adapts to new theology.
10. Seers and Priests: Threads of Inspiration – From Ṛṣi to
Zaotar
Zarathushtra weaves: “I who would weave my songs…”
(Yasna 28.1) Ṛṣi echoes: “The ṛṣi weaves hymns with his mind…” (RV
10.117.7)
Ṛṣi
- Visionaries: Mantra-draṣṭā—seers who
“see” eternal truth.
- Multi-generational: 100+ families, from Gṛtsamada
to Vasiṣṭha.
- Role: Compose, chant, sacrifice.
Zaotar
- Prophet-Priest: Zarathushtra is the first
zaotar.
- Magi: Hereditary tribe preserving oral
tradition.
- Role: Recite Gāthās, maintain fire, teach
ethics.
Jenny Rose uncovers lost voices: “Indo-Iranian priestesses
lost in later patriarchy.” Early texts mention female zaotar and brahmavādinī—women
who debated philosophy.
11. From Persecution to Empire: Zoroastrianism’s Millennium
March – Political and Institutional Growth
The Gāthās lament: “Few heed me.” (Yasna 46) King
Vishtaspa hears—and converts. The Magi, hereditary priests, become
living libraries. Richard Frye traces the spark: “Zarathushtra’s innovation
was moral absolutism; polytheism tolerated ambiguity.”
Early Spread
- Eastern Iran: Bactria, Sogdiana—regional
kingdoms adopt.
- Oral Transmission: Gāthās memorized in Zand
(commentary).
Achaemenid Patronage (550–330 BCE)
- Cyrus the Great invokes Ahura Mazda in Cyrus
Cylinder.
- Darius I: “By the grace of Ahura Mazda, I am
king.”
Sasanian Zenith (224–651 CE)
- Ardashir I crowns Zoroastrianism state religion.
- Shapur II standardises priesthood.
- Khosrow I patronises academies.
- Population: 10–20 million.
Touraj Daryaee sees the strategy: “Sasanian statecraft
weaponized Zoroastrianism.”
12. The Long Twilight: Collapse and Diaspora – From Empire
to Embers
651 CE: Arab armies topple Yazdgerd III. Jizya tax, temple
ruins, forced conversion. Monica Ringer preserves the ember: “Zoroastrianism
survived by becoming a religion of memory.”
Persecution Phases
- Umayyad: Jizya, social exclusion.
- Abbasid: Temple destruction.
- Safavid: Forced Shi’ism.
Parsi Exodus
- 8th–10th centuries: Ships to Gujarat.
- Qissa-i Sanjan: 937 CE landing, Sanjan fire
consecrated.
Today: ~120,000 Parsis, navjote ritual, sudreh-kusti
sacred thread.
13. Gupta Dawn: Parallel Imperial Revivals – Political
Theology in Action
320–550 CE: Gupta emperors build Vishnu temples, patronise
Purāṇas. Romila Thapar sees the mirror: “Parallel imperial theologies, not
causation.”
Sasanian Strategy
- Zoroastrianism binds diverse Iran against
Rome/Christianity.
Gupta Strategy
- Vaishnavism unites India against Buddhism’s monastic
withdrawal.
Both empires use ancient faith for modern power.
14. End of Days: Linear vs. Cyclic – Eschatological
Divergence
- Frashokereti: Saoshyant renovates world in
fire and truth. Y. 30.9: “The world will be made fresh.”
- Pralaya: Later Hindu texts dissolve and renew
in endless cycles.
Mary Boyce traces the influence: “Zoroastrian linear time
birthed Abrahamic eschatology; Vedic cycles stayed eternal.”
Judgment
- Chinvat Bridge: Souls weighed.
- Yama’s Realm: Vague, poetic.
15. Purity and Time: Shared Sacred Grammar – Ritual and
Calendar
- Padyab (Zoroastrian ablution) = Snāna
(Hindu bath)
- Menstrual seclusion, corpse pollution
identical.
Calendar
- 360 + 5 epagomenal days → Nowruz = ancient New Year.
- Gahambar festivals = Vedic seasonal rites.
Antonio Panaino counts the sun: “Solar reckoning from
common steppe heritage.”
Reflection
Kneel at any fire altar—whether in a Mumbai agiyari or
a Varanasi hom—and you kneel in the Bronze Age. One people, one flame,
one truth (Asha/Ṛta). Zarathushtra’s solitary question—“Whom do you
choose?”—and the ṛṣi’s ecstatic chorus—“All this is Agni!”—are not rivals but complementary
breaths of the same soul.
The Gāthās teach that reform begins with
subtraction—one God, one path, 17 hymns against a pantheon. The Rigveda
shows that wonder needs no apology—10,600 stanzas of gods, rivers, dawns. The
schism was not betrayal; it was evolution: Zoroastrianism gifted ethical
urgency to the Abrahamic world; Hinduism preserved polytheistic inclusivity for
a billion hearts.
In 17 hymns, Zarathushtra moralised cattle; in 10,600 stanzas,
ṛṣis militarised dawn. Yet both sing to the same.wind (Vāyu), press the same
plant (Soma/Haoma), and slay the same dragon. The Magi’s oral chains and
Brahmin pāṭhas conquered time through human throats—the first
libraries.
Today, a Parsi child invests the sudreh in navjote;
a Tamil boy ties the sacred thread in upanayana. Same cord, same
ancestry. The Indo-Iranian soul did not break; it multiplied. In an age
of synthetic faiths, their organic divergence warns against forced unity yet
celebrates shared DNA. The fire still burns. The waters still flow. And in
every dawn hymn, every purity rite, every pressed stalk, the ancient voice
whispers: truth has many names, but order is one.
References
Boyce, Mary. 1975. A History of Zoroastrianism: The
Early Period. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill. (Cited for linguistic kinship,
eschatology, and Zoroastrian survival; e.g., linear time influencing Abrahamic
traditions.)
Boyce, Mary. 1979. Zoroastrians: Their Religious
Beliefs and Practices. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (General
reference for Zoroastrian history, rituals, and diaspora.)
Choksy, Jamsheed K. 1989. Purity and Pollution in
Zoroastrianism: Triumph over Evil. Austin: University of Texas Press. (Quoted
on fire as visible divinity and pollution as sacrilege.)
Daryaee, Touraj. 2009. Sasanian Persia: The Rise and
Fall of an Empire. London: I.B. Tauris. (Quoted on Sasanian statecraft
and Zoroastrian institutionalization.)
Falk, Harry. 1989. “Soma I and II.” Bulletin of the
School of Oriental and African Studies 52 (1): 77–90. (Quoted on Soma
and Haoma as ritual twins.)
Frye, Richard N. 1963. The Heritage of Persia.
London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. (Quoted on Zarathushtra’s moral
absolutism.)
Grenet, Frantz. 2005. “Religious History of Central
Asia.” In The Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 3, edited by Ehsan
Yarshater, 121–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Referenced for
Kartir’s persecution of Buddhists.)
Hintze, Almut. 2007. A Zoroastrian Liturgy: The
Yasna in Its Ritual Context. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. (Quoted on
Gāthās’ liturgical crescendo and meter progression.)
Hoffmann, Karl. 1976. “Avestan Language.” In Handbuch
der Orientalistik, Abt. 1, Bd. 4, Abschnitt 1, 1–58. Leiden: Brill. (Quoted
on Avestan and Vedic as dialectal variants.)
Humbach, Helmut. 1991. The Gāthās of Zarathushtra
and the Other Old Avestan Texts. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Winter. (Quoted on
Zarathushtra’s reclassification of gods.)
Jamison, Stephanie W. 2014. The Rig Veda: The
Earliest Religious Poetry of India. Translated with David W. Anthony.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Quoted on Gāthās as prophetic
autobiography vs. Rigveda as tribal anthology.)
Kellens, Jean. 1990. Essays on Zarathushtra and
Zoroastrianism. Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers. (Referenced for linguistic
dating of Gāthās to c. 1200–1000 BCE.)
Lincoln, Bruce. 1981. Priests, Warriors, and Cattle:
A Study in the Ecology of Religions. Berkeley: University of California
Press. (Referenced for dragon-slaying as Indo-Iranian archetype.)
Mallory, J. P. 1989. In Search of the
Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology and Myth. London: Thames &
Hudson. (Quoted on Indo-Iranian cultural continuum.)
Panaino, Antonio. 1990. The Zoroastrian Calendar: A
Study of the Gāhānbār and the Intercalation System. Rome: Istituto Italiano
per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente. (Quoted on solar reckoning from steppe
heritage.)
Parpola, Asko. 2015. The Roots of Hinduism: The
Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Quoted
on post-migration schism and dialectical differences.)
Ringer, Monica M. 2011. Pious Citizens: Reforming
Zoroastrianism in India and Iran. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. (Quoted
on Zoroastrianism as a religion of memory post-conquest.)
Rose, Jenny. 2011. Zoroastrianism: An Introduction.
London: I.B. Tauris. (Quoted on Indo-Iranian priestesses.)
Schmidt, Hanns-Peter. 1968. “Ṛta and Aša.” In Mélanges
d’Indianisme à la mémoire de Louis Renou, 523–539. Paris: Éditions de
Boccard. (Quoted on Asha and Ṛta as identical in word and soul.)
Shaked, Shaul. 1994. Dualism in Transformation:
Varieties of Religion in Sasanian Iran. London: School of Oriental and
African Studies. (Referenced for ethical triad.)
Skjærvø, Prods Oktor. 2011. The Spirit of
Zoroastrianism. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Quoted on Yasna 28.1
and RV 10.129 as one voice split by a mountain range.)
Staal, Frits. 2008. Discovering the Vedas: Origins,
Mantras, Rituals, Insights. New Delhi: Penguin Books India. (Quoted on
meter as mnemonic armor.)
Stausberg, Michael. 2004. Zoroastrian Rituals in
Context. Leiden: Brill. (Quoted on Yasna as internalized yajña.)
Thapar, Romila. 2002. Early India: From the Origins
to AD 1300. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Quoted on
parallel imperial theologies of Sasanian and Gupta eras.)
Watkins, Calvert. 1995. How to Kill a Dragon:
Aspects of Indo-European Poetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Quoted
on Indo-Iranian chaoskampf motif.)
Witzel, Michael. 2012. The Origins of the World’s
Mythologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Referenced for shared
mythic homeland.)
Primary Texts
- Avesta (Yasna, Gāthās, Yashts, Vendidad).
Translated by L. H. Mills (1887), Sacred Books of the East, vol.
31; and Prods Oktor Skjærvø (ongoing digital editions).
- Rigveda. Translated by Stephanie W. Jamison
and Joel P. Brereton (2014), The Rig Veda: The Earliest Religious
Poetry of India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Qissa-i Sanjan. Parsi Gujarati text (c. 1599
CE), translated by A. V. Williams Jackson (1925).
Additional Notes
- Archaeological references (Sintashta, Andronovo,
Boghazkoi tablets) are based on consensus from Mallory (1989), Parpola
(2015), and Kuz’mina, Elena E. The Origin 2007.The Prehistory of the
Silk Road. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Population estimates for Sasanian Zoroastrianism
(10–20 million) follow Foltz, Richard. 2013. Religions of Iran: From
Prehistory to the Present. London: Oneworld.
- Modern Zoroastrian population (~120,000) from
Hinnells, John R. 2005. The Zoroastrian Diaspora: Religion and
Migration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Comments
Post a Comment