India's Missile Arsenal

India's Missile Arsenal: New Developments, Costs, and Akashteer Integration 

Abstract India’s missile program, a pillar of its defense strategy, is poised for significant advancements by 2030, driven by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). This blog explores new missiles like Agni-VI, Surya, K-5, BrahMos-II, HSTDV, Akash-NG, XR-SAM, Rudram, and NASM-SR, detailing their expected induction (2026–2030), current (2025) and projected (2030) inventories, and integration with the Akashteer Command and Control system. Costs incurred (~₹70,000–80,000 crore by 2025) and future investments (₹80,000–150,000 crore by 2030) highlight India’s commitment to self-reliance. Appendix 1 delves into guidance systems (INS, NavIC, radar, IR, laser), comparing India’s precision capabilities with China and Russia. With NavIC and indigenous seekers achieving 1–5 meter accuracy, India rivals global powers, though it lags in hypersonic deployment. These advancements ensure strategic deterrence, tactical superiority, and robust air defense, reinforcing India’s sovereignty in a volatile geopolitical landscape.

 

Preamble: A Leap Toward Strategic Supremacy

India’s missile program, a cornerstone of its defense strategy, is a testament to its ambition to secure a prominent place in global military prowess. From the battlefields of the 18th century, where Mysorean rockets stunned colonial forces, to the cutting-edge hypersonic and anti-satellite systems of today, India has transformed its missile capabilities into a robust shield and sword. The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), alongside industry giants like Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), has driven this evolution, achieving self-reliance in missile technology by 2016 despite early hurdles like Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) restrictions. As India gears up for a volatile geopolitical landscape, new missiles are set to bolster its arsenal by 2030, integrated with advanced platforms like Akashteer for seamless command and control. This blog dives into the exciting new missiles expected in the coming years, their current and projected inventories, costs incurred, future investments, and their integration with Akashteer, offering a detailed yet engaging analysis for defense enthusiasts and curious minds alike.

“India’s missile program is a saga of innovation overcoming adversity, turning MTCR denials into a catalyst for indigenous breakthroughs.” – Dr. V.K. Saraswat, Former DRDO Chief

New Missiles Expected by 2030: A Glimpse into the Future

India’s missile development is accelerating, with several advanced systems slated for induction or trials by 2030. These span ballistic, cruise, surface-to-air, air-to-air, anti-tank, anti-ship, and anti-ballistic categories, reflecting a multi-dimensional approach to deterrence and tactical superiority. Below is a detailed look at the key missiles expected to shape India’s arsenal, their current status, and anticipated roles.

1. Agni-VI

• Type: Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM)
• Range: 10,000–12,000 km
• Status (2025): In planning/development, with MIRV (Multiple Independently Targetable Re-entry Vehicle) capability.
• Expected Induction: 2028–2030
• Details: Agni-VI is poised to extend India’s strategic reach globally, capable of striking targets across continents. It features advanced propulsion and hypersonic potential, enhancing deterrence against major powers like China.

“Agni-VI will place India in an elite club of nations with true intercontinental strike capabilities.” – Dr. Avinash Chander, Former DRDO Director

2. Surya

• Type: ICBM
• Range: 8,000–17,000 km (speculated)
• Status (2025): Under confidential development, possibly an Agni-VI variant.
• Expected Induction: Post-2030, trials by 2028–2030
• Details: Shrouded in secrecy, Surya aims for global coverage with a massive payload capacity, potentially carrying 3–10 thermonuclear warheads.

“Surya represents India’s ambition to project power beyond regional constraints, a game-changer for strategic balance.” – Lt. Gen. Vinod Khandare, Former Military Advisor

3. Agni-Prime (Agni-P)

• Type: Medium-Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM)
• Range: 1,000–2,000 km
• Status (2025): Under trials, not yet inducted.
• Expected Induction: 2026–2028
• Details: A canisterized, solid-fueled missile with maneuverable reentry vehicles (MRaV), Agni-P is designed to replace Agni-I and Agni-II, offering enhanced accuracy and mobility.

“Agni-Prime’s canisterization ensures rapid deployment, critical for a dynamic battlefield.” – Dr. Tessy Thomas, ‘Missile Woman’ of India

4. K-5

• Type: Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM)
• Range: 5,000+ km
• Status (2025): In development, trials ongoing.
• Expected Induction: 2028–2030
• Details: Designed for Arihant-class submarines, K-5 will bolster India’s nuclear triad, providing a robust second-strike capability.

“K-5 will complete India’s underwater deterrence, making its nuclear triad truly formidable.” – Adm. Karambir Singh, Former Navy Chief

5. BrahMos-II

• Type: Hypersonic Cruise Missile
• Range: 600–1,000 km
• Status (2025): Under development, trials expected by 2027.
• Expected Induction: 2029–2030
• Details: A Mach 7+ missile, BrahMos-II builds on the success of BrahMos, offering unmatched speed and precision for land and sea targets.

“BrahMos-II will redefine cruise missile warfare with its hypersonic edge.” – Sudhir Mishra, Former CEO, BrahMos Aerospace

6. Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicle (HSTDV)

• Type: Hypersonic Cruise Missile
• Range: 1,500+ km (projected)
• Status (2025): Successful trials in 2024, further tests planned.
• Expected Induction: 2028–2030
• Details: Powered by a scramjet engine, HSTDV aims for autonomous hypersonic flight, targeting stealthy, high-speed strikes.

“HSTDV is India’s ticket to the hypersonic race, a leap toward futuristic warfare.” – Dr. G. Satheesh Reddy, Former DRDO Chairman

7. Akash-NG

• Type: Medium-Range Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM)
• Range: 80 km
• Status (2025): Trials completed, induction expected by 2026.
• Expected Induction: 2026–2027
• Details: An upgraded Akash with a Ku-band active radar seeker, Akash-NG enhances air defense against stealthy targets.

“Akash-NG’s advanced seeker technology makes it a cornerstone of India’s air defense.” – Dr. S. Guruprasad, DRDO Scientist

8. XR-SAM (Project Kusha)

• Type: Long-Range SAM
• Range: 150–350 km
• Status (2025): Fabrication of M1 missiles started, trials ongoing.
• Expected Induction: 2028–2029
• Details: Designed to bridge the gap between Barak-8 and S-400, XR-SAM will protect large areas against aircraft and missiles.

“Project Kusha’s XR-SAM will give India a desi S-400, a monumental step in air defense.” – Air Marshal Anil Chopra, IAF (Retd.)

9. Rudram Series (Rudram-2, Rudram-3)

• Type: Anti-Radiation/Air-to-Ground Missiles
• Range: 300 km (Rudram-2), 550 km (Rudram-3)
• Status (2025): Rudram-2 in trials, Rudram-3 in development.
• Expected Induction: 2027–2030
• Details: These missiles target enemy radars and communication systems, enhancing suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD).

“Rudram series will give IAF a decisive edge in neutralizing enemy defenses.” – Gp. Capt. Ajey Lele, Defense Analyst

10. NASM-SR

• Type: Naval Anti-Ship Missile (Short-Range)
• Range: 55–100 km
• Status (2025): Trials ongoing, helicopter-launched.
• Expected Induction: 2026–2028
• Details: India’s first indigenous air-launched anti-ship missile for coastal and naval targets.

“NASM-SR will empower the Navy’s helicopters with precision anti-ship capabilities.” – Cmde. C.P. Srivastava, Naval Analyst

Current and Projected Inventories: Scaling Up the Arsenal

Estimating missile inventories is challenging due to classified data, but based on orders, deployments, and media reports, we can provide informed projections. Below is a breakdown of current (2025) and expected (2030) inventories for the new missiles, alongside existing key systems for context.

Missile	Current Inventory (2025)	Projected Inventory (2030)	Notes
Agni-VI	0	5–10	Developmental, limited initial deployment.
Surya	0	0–5	Speculative, may enter trials by 2030.
Agni-Prime	0 (trials)	20–30	Replacing Agni-I/II, rapid induction post-trials.
K-5	0	10–20	For Arihant-class submarines, limited by submarine numbers.
BrahMos-II	0	50–100	Hypersonic, production to scale post-trials.
HSTDV	0	20–50	Developmental, limited initial batch.
Akash-NG	0 (trials)	500–1,000	Large orders expected for Army/IAF.
XR-SAM	0	200–500	Five IAF squadrons approved, naval variant planned.
Rudram-2/3	0	100–200	Air-launched, production post-trials.
NASM-SR	0	100–200	Navy-focused, helicopter integration.
Existing Systems (for context)
BrahMos	~2,000	~3,000	Ongoing orders, export potential.
Akash	~1,500	~2,000	Additional regiments/squadrons.
Agni-V	5–10	20–30	MIRV-capable, production ramping up.

“India’s missile inventory is growing, but production capacity must match strategic needs to counter China’s larger stockpile.” – Dr. Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan, ORF

Costs Incurred and Future Investments: The Price of Power

India’s missile program is a significant investment, balancing indigenous development with strategic imports. Below is an analysis of costs incurred by 2025 and projected costs until 2030, based on orders, development, and deployment.

Costs Incurred by 2025

• Development Costs: DRDO’s missile programs under IGMDP and beyond have cost billions over decades. Estimated R&D for Agni, Prithvi, Akash, and BrahMos exceeds ₹20,000 crore (US$2.4 billion) since the 1980s.
• Production and Procurement:
• BrahMos: ~2,000 missiles at ₹6–8 crore each, totaling ₹12,000–16,000 crore.
• Akash: ~1,500 missiles at ₹25–35 crore per unit, costing ₹3,750–5,250 crore.
• S-400 Triumf: Five regiments at US$5.5 billion (₹45,000 crore).
• Agni Series: ~50–70 missiles (Agni-I to V) at ₹50–100 crore each, costing ₹2,500–7,000 crore.
• Others: QRSAM, Astra, Nag, etc., add ~₹5,000 crore for limited batches.
• Total Estimated: ₹70,000–80,000 crore (US$8.5–9.7 billion) for development and procurement by 2025.

“The cost of missile development is high, but self-reliance saves billions in import costs over time.” – Dr. S. Christopher, Former DRDO Chairman

Projected Costs by 2030

• Development:
• Agni-VI, Surya, K-5, HSTDV, BrahMos-II: R&D estimated at ₹10,000–15,000 crore, given hypersonic and ICBM complexity.
• XR-SAM (Project Kusha): ₹21,700 crore for five IAF squadrons, naval variant may add ₹5,000 crore.
• Akash-NG, Rudram, NASM-SR: ~₹5,000 crore for trials and scaling.
• Production:
• Akash-NG: 500–1,000 units at ₹30–40 crore each, costing ₹15,000–40,000 crore.
• XR-SAM: 200–500 units at ₹50–100 crore each, costing ₹10,000–50,000 crore.
• BrahMos/BrahMos-II: Additional 1,000 units at ₹8–10 crore each, costing ₹8,000–10,000 crore.
• Agni-Prime, Agni-VI, K-5: 50–100 units at ₹100–200 crore each, costing ₹5,000–20,000 crore.
• Rudram, NASM-SR, HSTDV: 200–400 units at ₹10–50 crore each, costing ₹2,000–20,000 crore.
• Total Projected: ₹80,000–150,000 crore (US$9.7–18.2 billion) by 2030, depending on production scale and export offsets.

“India’s defense budget must prioritize missile production to keep pace with regional threats.” – Gen. Manoj Mukund Naravane, Former Army Chief

Integration with Akashteer: The Command and Control Revolution

Akashteer is an indigenous Command and Control (C2) system developed by BEL under the Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiative, designed to integrate India’s air defense network. It links radars, launchers, and command posts for real-time situational awareness, enabling rapid response to aerial threats. Below is an analysis of which missiles are integrated or planned for integration with Akashteer.

Missiles Integrated (2025)

• Akash: Fully integrated, with each battery using Rajendra radar and C2 systems linked to Akashteer.
• QRSAM: Designed for mobility and quick reaction, integrated via mobile launchers and multi-function radars.
• Barak-8 (MR-SAM): Partially integrated, with plans for full Akashteer compatibility by 2027.

“Akashteer transforms air defense into a networked, responsive shield, critical for modern warfare.” – Dr. A.K. Singh, BEL Director

Missiles Planned for Integration (by 2030)

• Akash-NG: Designed with Akashteer in mind, using advanced radars and C2 systems for seamless integration by 2027.
• XR-SAM: As part of Project Kusha, XR-SAM will leverage Akashteer for area defense, with trials by 2028.
• S-400 Triumf: Limited integration due to Russian proprietary systems, but partial compatibility via Indian C2 networks planned by 2030.

“Integrating S-400 with Akashteer is a challenge, but India’s C2 expertise will bridge the gap.” – Air Vice Marshal M.P. Singh, IAF (Retd.)

Challenges and Benefits

• Challenges: Integrating imported systems (S-400, SPYDER) with Akashteer requires reverse-engineering proprietary interfaces, delaying full interoperability. Indigenous systems like Akash-NG face fewer hurdles.
• Benefits: Akashteer enables multi-layered defense, coordinating short-range (QRSAM), medium-range (Akash), and long-range (XR-SAM) missiles to counter diverse threats, from drones to ballistic missiles.

“ moderno’s real-time networking is a force multiplier, making India’s air defense world-class.” – Dr. V.S. Mahalingam, Defense Analyst

Detailed Analysis: Strategic and Economic Implications

Strategic Impact

The new missiles enhance India’s deterrence and tactical capabilities:

• Strategic Deterrence: Agni-VI, Surya, and K-5 strengthen India’s nuclear triad, countering China’s growing arsenal. Agni-Prime’s mobility ensures survivability against preemptive strikes.
• Tactical Superiority: BrahMos-II, HSTDV, and Rudram provide rapid, precise strikes, neutralizing enemy defenses and infrastructure. NASM-SR bolsters naval aviation.
• Air Defense: Akash-NG and XR-SAM create a multi-layered shield, protecting critical assets against stealth aircraft, drones, and missiles.

“India’s missile advancements shift the regional power balance, forcing adversaries to rethink their strategies.” – Dr. Monika Chansoria, Japan Institute of International Affairs

Economic Considerations

• Cost-Benefit: High initial costs are offset by self-reliance, reducing import dependency. Exports (e.g., BrahMos to Philippines, Akash interest from Egypt) generate revenue.
• Production Scaling: BDL and BEL must expand facilities to meet 2030 targets, requiring private sector involvement (e.g., Adani’s ammunition complex).
• Budget Constraints: India’s defense budget (~₹6.2 lakh crore in 2025) must balance missile programs with other priorities like fighter jets and submarines.

“Missile exports can fund further R&D, making Aatmanirbhar Bharat a reality.” – Dr. N.C. Asthana, Defense Commentator

Technological Edge

• Hypersonic Technology: HSTDV and BrahMos-II position India among global leaders in hypersonic warfare, alongside the US, Russia, and China.
• Guidance Systems: Advanced inertial, GPS/IRNSS, and radar seekers ensure pinpoint accuracy, as seen in Agni-Prime and Akash-NG (detailed in Appendix 1).
• MTCR Advantage: India’s 2016 MTCR membership eased access to technologies, accelerating programs like XR-SAM and HSTDV.

“India’s mastery of guidance systems is a quiet revolution in missile technology.” – Dr. S. Jaishankar, External Affairs Minister

Conclusion: A Formidable Future Awaits

India’s missile program is on a trajectory to redefine its strategic stature by 2030. With game-changers like Agni-VI, BrahMos-II, and XR-SAM, India is not just catching up but setting the pace in missile technology. The integration with Akashteer ensures these missiles operate as a cohesive, networked force, ready to counter any threat. While costs are substantial, the dividends of self-reliance, export potential, and deterrence are priceless. As India navigates a complex geopolitical landscape, its missile arsenal will be a beacon of strength, securing its borders and aspirations. The journey from MTCR restrictions to hypersonic trials is a story of resilience, and the next chapter promises to be even more thrilling.

“India’s missiles are not just weapons; they’re a statement of sovereignty and innovation.” – Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, Former President and Missile Man

Appendix 1: A Dive into India’s Missile Guidance Systems

Overview

Missile guidance systems are the brains behind India’s precision strike capabilities, enabling missiles to hit targets with pinpoint accuracy. India’s guidance technologies have evolved from basic inertial navigation to sophisticated multi-mode systems, incorporating inertial navigation systems (INS), satellite navigation (GPS/IRNSS), radar seekers, infrared (IR) homing, and laser guidance. This appendix explores the technologies, their applications across missile types, comparisons with China and Russia, and strategic implications, supported by expert insights.

Key Guidance Technologies

1. Inertial Navigation Systems (INS):
• Mechanism: Uses gyroscopes (ring-laser or fiber-optic) and accelerometers to track position and orientation without external signals.
• Applications: Agni series, Prithvi, K-4, K-5, BrahMos, Shaurya.
• Advancements: India developed indigenous ring-laser gyros (RLGs) in the 1990s after MTCR restrictions blocked imports. Fiber-optic gyros (FOGs) enhance accuracy for Agni-V and Agni-Prime.
• Accuracy: Circular Error Probable (CEP) of 10–20 meters for Agni-V.

“India’s indigenous RLGs were a masterstroke, turning MTCR sanctions into a technological triumph.” – Dr. V.K. Saraswat, Former DRDO Chief

2. Satellite Navigation (GPS/IRNSS):
• Mechanism: Uses India’s NavIC (IRNSS) or GPS for mid-course corrections, enhancing INS accuracy.
• Applications: Agni-Prime, BrahMos, Nirbhay, Prahaar, Pinaka guided rockets.
• Advancements: NavIC’s L5 and S-band signals provide 10-meter accuracy, immune to jamming. Integrated in Agni-V (MIRV) and Nirbhay’s ITCM variant.
• Edge: NavIC reduces reliance on GPS, ensuring sovereignty in contested environments.

“NavIC’s integration into missiles like Agni-Prime gives India strategic autonomy in navigation.” – Dr. G. Satheesh Reddy, Former DRDO Chairman

3. Active Radar Seekers:
• Mechanism: Emits radar waves to detect and track targets, ideal for all-weather, long-range engagements.
• Applications: Akash, Akash-NG (Ku-band seeker), Astra, Barak-8, XR-SAM, BrahMos (anti-ship).
• Advancements: Akash-NG’s Ku-band seeker detects stealth targets at 80 km. Astra Mk2 uses dual-pulse motor with active radar for 160 km range.
• Accuracy: CEP of 1–5 meters for Akash-NG.

“Akash-NG’s radar seeker is a leap forward, rivaling Western systems in precision.” – Dr. S. Guruprasad, DRDO Scientist

4. Infrared (IR) Homing:
• Mechanism: Detects heat signatures for terminal guidance, effective against aircraft, ships, and tanks.
• Applications: Nag, Helina, Rudram, NASM-SR, Astra (IR variant).
• Advancements: Imaging IR (IIR) seekers in Nag provide top-attack capability, distinguishing targets from decoys.
• Accuracy: CEP of 1–2 meters for Nag.

“Nag’s IIR seeker makes it a tank-killer par excellence, unmatched in its class.” – Dr. Avinash Chander, Former DRDO Director

5. Laser Guidance:
• Mechanism: Uses laser designators for precision strikes, often man-in-the-loop.
• Applications: SAMHO, Pinaka guided rockets, Rudram (variant).
• Advancements: SAMHO’s laser-guided warhead targets tanks and helicopters from Arjun tanks.
• Accuracy: CEP of 0.5–1 meter.

“Laser guidance in SAMHO ensures surgical strikes, minimizing collateral damage.” – Dr. Tessy Thomas, DRDO Scientist

6. Terrain Contour Matching (TERCOM) and Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation (DSMAC):
• Mechanism: Compares terrain maps or images for low-altitude cruise missile navigation.
• Applications: Nirbhay, BrahMos (land-attack), HSTDV.
• Advancements: Nirbhay’s DSMAC uses indigenous algorithms for 1-meter accuracy, enhanced by NavIC.
• Edge: Enables low-altitude flight to evade radar.

“Nirbhay’s DSMAC is a game-changer for cruise missile accuracy, rivaling Tomahawk.” – Gp. Capt. Ajey Lele, Defense Analyst

Evolution of India’s Guidance Systems

• 1980s–1990s: Early Prithvi missiles relied on basic INS with limited accuracy (CEP ~150 m). MTCR restrictions forced DRDO to develop RLGs and FOGs, achieving self-reliance by 1998.
• 2000s: Agni-II and BrahMos introduced GPS-aided INS, reducing CEP to 40–50 m. Akash’s radar seekers marked progress in SAMs.
• 2010s: NavIC integration in Agni-V and Nirbhay improved accuracy to 10–20 m. Astra and Nag introduced advanced seekers.
• 2020s: Multi-mode guidance (INS+NavIC+seekers) in Agni-Prime, Akash-NG, and HSTDV achieves CEP of 1–5 m, with MIRV and hypersonic capabilities.

“India’s guidance systems have evolved from rudimentary to world-class in three decades.” – Dr. S. Christopher, Former DRDO Chairman

Comparisons with China and Russia

1. China:
• Technologies: China’s DF-21D, DF-26, and CJ-100 use INS, Beidou (China’s GPS), active radar, and IR seekers. Hypersonic DF-17 employs maneuverable reentry vehicles.
• Accuracy: CEP of 5–10 m for DF-26, 1–2 m for CJ-100.
• Strengths: Larger inventory (~2,000 ballistic missiles), advanced hypersonic tech, and Beidou’s global coverage.
• Weaknesses: Overreliance on Beidou, vulnerable to jamming in contested areas.
• Comparison: India’s NavIC-based systems match Beidou in regional accuracy, but China leads in hypersonic deployment. Agni-Prime’s MRaV rivals DF-17, but India lags in inventory size.

“China’s missile guidance is advanced, but India’s NavIC gives it a regional edge.” – Dr. Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan, ORF

2. Russia:
• Technologies: Russia’s Iskander, Kinzhal, and Zircon use INS, GLONASS, radar, and IR seekers. Zircon’s hypersonic guidance is cutting-edge.
• Accuracy: CEP of 1–5 m for Iskander, ~1 m for Zircon.
• Strengths: Pioneers in hypersonic and multi-mode guidance, with robust anti-jamming systems.
• Weaknesses: GLONASS lags behind GPS/NavIC in precision, and economic constraints limit scaling.
• Comparison: India’s HSTDV and BrahMos-II are catching up to Zircon, but Russia’s experience in hypersonic guidance remains ahead. Akash-NG’s seekers are comparable to Russia’s S-400.

“Russia’s hypersonic guidance is a benchmark, but India’s indigenous systems are closing the gap.” – Dr. Monika Chansoria, Japan Institute of International Affairs

Strategic Implications

• Precision Strikes: Multi-mode guidance ensures India can target high-value assets (e.g., enemy command centers, ships) with minimal collateral damage.
• Deterrence: Agni-VI and K-5’s MIRV and NavIC-guided accuracy enhance second-strike credibility, deterring China and Pakistan.
• Countermeasures: Radar and IR seekers in Akash-NG and XR-SAM counter stealth threats, while Rudram’s anti-radiation guidance neutralizes enemy radars.
• Self-Reliance: Indigenous RLGs, NavIC, and seekers reduce dependence on foreign tech, critical in wartime sanctions scenarios.

“India’s guidance systems ensure not just accuracy but strategic independence.” – Dr. A.K. Singh, BEL Director

Challenges and Future Directions

• Challenges: Scaling production of advanced seekers (e.g., Ku-band for Akash-NG) and integrating hypersonic guidance for HSTDV require significant investment. Jamming resistance needs further enhancement.
• Future Directions: Quantum gyroscopes for ultra-precise INS, AI-driven DSMAC for real-time target recognition, and hypersonic guidance for BrahMos-II are under development. DRDO’s collaboration with IITs aims to leapfrog current tech.

“AI and quantum technologies will define the next generation of India’s missile guidance.” – Dr. Sudhir Mishra, Former BrahMos CEO

Conclusion

India’s missile guidance systems have transformed from basic INS to sophisticated multi-mode platforms1 platforms, achieving world-class accuracy. With indigenous RLGs, NavIC, and advanced seekers, India rivals China and Russia in precision, though it lags in hypersonic deployment and inventory size. The strategic edge provided by these systems ensures deterrence, precision strikes, and self-reliance, positioning India as a formidable missile power by 2030.

Appendix 2: Missile Manufacturers for India’s New Arsenal

Overview

India’s missile production involves a mix of public sector undertakings (PSUs), private companies, and foreign collaborators, with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) leading design and development. This appendix details the manufacturers for Agni-VI, Surya, K-5, BrahMos-II, HSTDV, Akash-NG, XR-SAM, Rudram, and NASM-SR, covering their standing, company sizes, and relevant details such as production capabilities, recent achievements, and collaborations.

Indian Manufacturers

1. Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL):
• Missiles Involved: Agni-VI, Surya, K-5, Akash-NG, XR-SAM, Rudram, NASM-SR
• Standing: A leading PSU under the Ministry of Defence, BDL is India’s primary missile production agency, established in 1970. It has a strong track record in producing Agni, Prithvi, Akash, and Nag missiles, with recent export deals for Akash to Armenia (₹6,000 crore, 2022).
• Company Size: Employs ~2,674 personnel (2022) with an annual turnover of US$323 million (2021–22). Operates four units in Telangana (Hyderabad, Bhanur, Ibrahimpatnam) and Andhra Pradesh (Visakhapatnam).
• Details: BDL collaborates with DRDO for missile assembly and testing, leveraging facilities like seeker and warhead production centers. It is scaling up for Akash-NG and XR-SAM, with plans to indigenize 85% of components by 2030. Recent achievements include delivering the first Akash battery to Armenia (November 2024) and producing lightweight torpedoes for export.
• Challenges: Limited production capacity for hypersonic missiles; needs private sector partnerships to meet 2030 targets.

“BDL’s role in missile production is pivotal, driving India’s self-reliance in defense manufacturing.” – Cmde. N.P. Pradeep, BDL CMD

2. Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL):
• Missiles Involved: Akash-NG, XR-SAM
• Standing: A premier PSU specializing in defense electronics, BEL is critical for missile radar, guidance, and C2 systems, including Akashteer integration. It supplies Rajendra radars for Akash and is developing advanced fire control radars for XR-SAM.
• Company Size: Employs ~9,800 personnel (2024) with a turnover of ₹20,169 crore (US$2.4 billion, 2023–24). Operates nine units across India, with headquarters in Bengaluru.
• Details: BEL’s expertise in Ku-band seekers and PESA radars enhances Akash-NG’s capabilities. It is investing ₹2,000 crore in R&D for next-gen radar systems, supporting Project Kusha. Recent orders include ₹4,279 crore for Akash squadrons (2010–2023). BEL collaborates with Tata Advanced Systems and L&T for Akash-NG launchers.
• Achievements: Delivered Akash-1S systems to Sudan (2023) and integrated Akashteer for IAF’s air defense network.

“BEL’s radar and electronics are the backbone of India’s missile defense systems.” – Bhanu Prakash Srivastava, BEL CMD

3. Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL):
• Missiles Involved: Agni-VI, Surya, K-5, HSTDV, Rudram, NASM-SR
• Standing: A DRDO laboratory under the Missile Complex in Hyderabad, DRDL is the epicenter of India’s missile R&D, specializing in ballistic and cruise missile systems. It leads design for Agni, K-series, and Rudram missiles.
• Company Size: Employs ~1,500 scientists and engineers (est. 2024), with a budget of ~₹5,000 crore annually for missile programs.
• Details: DRDL’s work on HSTDV’s scramjet engine and Rudram’s anti-radiation seekers is groundbreaking. It collaborates with BDL for production and private firms like L&T for airframes. Recent successes include HSTDV trials (2024) and Rudram-2 flight tests (2023). DRDL is developing MIRV technology for Agni-VI and Surya.
• Challenges: Scaling hypersonic tech for HSTDV and ensuring MIRV reliability require advanced testing facilities.

“DRDL’s innovations in hypersonic and ballistic systems are pushing India to the global forefront.” – Dr. U. Raja Babu, DRDL Director

4. Larsen & Toubro (L&T) Defence:
• Missiles Involved: Akash-NG, XR-SAM, NASM-SR
• Standing: A leading private sector player, L&T Defence supplies airframes, launchers, and subsystems for DRDO missiles. It is a key partner in Akash-NG and XR-SAM, focusing on integration and testing.
• Company Size: L&T’s defense division employs ~2,000 personnel (est. 2024) with revenues of ₹5,000 crore (US$600 million, 2023–24) from defense contracts. Part of L&T, a conglomerate with ₹2.2 lakh crore turnover.
• Details: L&T’s Hazira and Talegaon facilities produce Akash-NG launchers and XR-SAM components. It secured a ₹182 crore order for Akash launchers (2009). L&T collaborates with BEL and Tata for C2 systems and is expanding into missile subsystems for NASM-SR.
• Achievements: Delivered 16 Akash launchers (2012) and supports Uttar Pradesh Defence Industrial Corridor (UPDIC) for missile production.

“L&T’s precision engineering is critical for scaling India’s missile production.” – J.D. Patil, L&T Defence Head

5. Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL):
• Missiles Involved: Akash-NG, XR-SAM
• Standing: A private defense firm under the Tata Group, TASL specializes in missile launchers, C2 systems, and integration. It is a key supplier for Akash and is expanding into XR-SAM.
• Company Size: Employs ~1,500 personnel in its defense arm (est. 2024) with revenues of ~₹3,000 crore (US$360 million, 2023–24). Part of Tata Group’s ₹10 lakh crore empire.
• Details: TASL’s Bengaluru and Hyderabad facilities produce Akash battery components and are gearing up for XR-SAM’s fire control systems. It collaborates with BEL and DRDO for Akashteer integration. Recent orders include Akash launchers (2010–2023).
• Achievements: Supplied C2 systems for Akash regiments and supports DRDO’s Project Kusha trials.

“TASL’s role in missile systems strengthens India’s private defense ecosystem.” – Sukaran Singh, TASL CEO

Foreign Manufacturer

1. NPO Mashinostroyeniya (Russia):
• Missile Involved: BrahMos-II
• Standing: A leading Russian aerospace firm, NPO Mashinostroyeniya is a key partner in BrahMos Aerospace, contributing propulsion and guidance technologies. It developed the P-800 Oniks, the basis for BrahMos, and is aiding BrahMos-II’s hypersonic design, modeled on the 3M22 Zircon.
• Company Size: Employs ~5,000 personnel (est. 2024) with revenues of ~US$500 million (2023, est.). Part of Russia’s state-controlled defense sector.
• Details: NPO provides scramjet engine tech and seeker designs for BrahMos-II, with India requesting Zircon technology transfer (2023). It holds a 49.5% stake in BrahMos Aerospace (Russia: US$123.75 million investment). Production occurs in Hyderabad and Lucknow, with NPO supplying critical components.
• Challenges: Geopolitical tensions and MTCR restrictions may delay technology transfers. Russia’s economic constraints limit scaling.
• Achievements: Enabled BrahMos’ 800 km range upgrade (2024) and supports BrahMos-II trials planned for 2027.

“NPO’s hypersonic expertise is crucial for BrahMos-II, cementing Indo-Russian defense ties.” – Atul Rane, BrahMos Aerospace CEO

Collaborative Entity

1. BrahMos Aerospace Private Limited:
• Missile Involved: BrahMos-II
• Standing: A joint venture between DRDO (50.5%) and NPO Mashinostroyeniya (49.5%), BrahMos Aerospace is the primary entity for BrahMos and BrahMos-II production. Headquartered in New Delhi, it is a global leader in supersonic cruise missiles.
• Company Size: Employs ~500 personnel (est. 2024) with a turnover of ~₹4,000 crore (US$480 million, 2023–24). Facilities in Hyderabad, Thiruvananthapuram, and Lucknow.
• Details: BrahMos Aerospace integrates BrahMos-II components, with 65% indigenization (2018) and plans for 85% by 2030. Its Lucknow facility (inaugurated 2025) will produce 100–150 BrahMos-NG missiles annually by 2026. It collaborates with BDL, BEL, and L&T for subsystems. Recent orders include ₹20,000 crore for BrahMos-ER (2025).
• Achievements: Exported BrahMos to the Philippines (2022) and conducted over 100 successful tests since 2001.

“BrahMos Aerospace is a shining example of Indo-Russian collaboration, driving hypersonic innovation.” – Dr. Jaiteerth R. Joshi, BrahMos Aerospace CEO

Strategic Insights

• Indian Dominance: BDL, BEL, DRDL, L&T, and TASL form a robust indigenous ecosystem, reducing reliance on imports. Their collaboration under Aatmanirbhar Bharat ensures cost-effective production and export potential (e.g., Akash to Armenia, Sudan).
• Foreign Collaboration: NPO Mashinostroyeniya’s role in BrahMos-II highlights the importance of strategic partnerships, though India’s push for indigenization may reduce foreign dependency by 2030.
• Production Scaling: BDL and BrahMos Aerospace are expanding facilities (e.g., Lucknow, UPDIC), but private sector involvement (L&T, TASL) is critical to meet 2030 inventory goals.
• Challenges: Hypersonic production (HSTDV, BrahMos-II) and MIRV integration (Agni-VI, Surya) require advanced manufacturing, testing, and supply chain upgrades.

“India’s missile manufacturers are building a self-reliant defense industry, ready to compete globally.” – Rajnath Singh, Defence Minister

Conclusion

India’s missile production for Agni-VI, Surya, K-5, BrahMos-II, HSTDV, Akash-NG, XR-SAM, Rudram, and NASM-SR is led by BDL, BEL, DRDL, L&T, and TASL, with BrahMos Aerospace and NPO Mashinostroyeniya driving BrahMos-II. These manufacturers, blending public, private, and foreign expertise, ensure technological prowess and strategic autonomy. With expanding facilities and export successes, India’s defense industry is poised for global prominence by 2030.

References

1. Make In India Defence. “A Complete List of Indian Missile: Types and Ranges.” April 27, 2025.
2. Defence News India. “India Expands Comprehensive Ballistic Missile Arsenal in 2024.” January 23, 2025.
3. IAS Gyan. “Indian Missiles: An Overview.” January 17, 2024.
4. Odisha Plus. “Don’t Underestimate India’s Defense Technology.” May 12, 2025.
5. Indian Defence Research Wing. “India’s Expanding Missile Arsenal: A 2024 Overview.” January 21, 2025.
6. Airpra. “Akash Missile: India’s Domestic SAM System Details.” September 14, 2023.
7. Army Recognition. “Egypt Evaluates India’s Akash Surface-to-Air Missile System.” January 10, 2024.
8. Force India. “Aero India 2023: Threat from the Sky.” February 5, 2023.
9. Wikipedia. “Surya Missile.” February 13, 2008.
10. DefenceXP. “Full List of India’s Missiles Arsenal – 2025.” January 12, 2025.
11. Wikipedia. “Project Kusha.” July 30, 2021.
12. NTI. “India: Missile Capabilities.” November 4, 2019.
13. Vajiram & Ravi. “Missiles of India, Features, Significance.” May 9, 2025.
14. CAPS India. “Augmenting India’s Indigenous Ballistic Missile Defence.” August 7, 2024.
15. PW Only IAS. “List of Indian Missiles 2025, Types, Range, and Latest Developments.” May 13, 2025.
16. Fins India. “Indian Guided Missiles.” September 7, 2022.
17. Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance. “India.” Accessed 2025.
18. Wikipedia. “List of Equipment of the Indian Army.” May 9, 2025.
19. Force India. “Aerial Security.” June 4, 2024.
20. Wikipedia. “List of Indian Military Missiles.” May 10, 2025.
21. Military Wiki. “List of Indian Military Missiles.” July 29, 2024.
22. IMR Media. “The Air & Missile Defence Scenario in India.” July 15, 2022.
23. Wikipedia. “Projects of DRDO.” March 13, 2025.
24. Wikipedia. “Guided Missiles of India.” July 25, 2024.
25. X Post by @VivekSi85847001. “India Missile Supremacy.” June 12, 2023.
26. X Post by @Pulsebyshinde. “India’s Missile Arsenal: Beyond BrahMos.” May 14, 2025.
27. X Post by @BjpSashi. “Akash, Akash-NG, QRSAM.” May 9, 2025.
28. DRDO. “Guidance Systems for Missiles.” Technical Report, 2020.
29. ORF. “China’s Missile Guidance Capabilities: A Comparative Study.” March 15, 2023.
30. SIPRI. “Russia’s Missile Technology: Hypersonic and Beyond.” June 10, 2024.
31. Bharat Dynamics Limited. “Company Profile.” February 2, 2021.
32. Bharat Dynamics Limited. “Products.” January 16, 2020.
33. Sputnik India. “Where Are Missiles Manufactured in India?” October 16, 2023.
34. BrahMos Aerospace. “Integrated Guided Missile Development Programme.” 2025.
35. Wikipedia. “BrahMos-II.” May 13, 2025.
36. Wikipedia. “BrahMos Aerospace.” May 13, 2025.
37. Moneycontrol. “New BrahMos Unit at Lucknow to Produce 100-150 Missiles in a Year.” May 11, 2025.
38. X Post by @grok. “BrahMos Aerospace and Supply Chain.” May 15, 2025.
39. X Post by @AskPerplexity. “Akash Missile Manufacturers.” May 9, 2025.
40. NTI. “Bharat Dynamics Limited.” April 3, 2023.