The Gulf’s Royal Titans: Wealth, Power, and Geopolitical Chess in
the House of Saud, Al Nahyan, Al Sabah, and Al Thani
The House of Saud,
Al Nahyan, Al Sabah, and Al Thani families, ruling Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi,
Kuwait, and Qatar, have transformed oil wealth into global influence over the
past 35 years, amassing fortunes from $112 billion to over $1 trillion. Through
sovereign wealth funds, military might, and soft power, they’ve shaped
geopolitics—think Saudi-led Yemen wars, UAE’s COP28 gambit, Qatar’s World Cup
spectacle, and Kuwait’s quiet diplomacy. Their leverage lies in energy markets,
strategic investments, and diplomatic maneuvering, balancing ties with the
U.S., China, EU, Russia, and India to maximize influence. Yet, their power
invites scrutiny: vast wealth fuels inequality, authoritarianism draws human
rights ire, and regional rivalries (e.g., Qatar blockade) expose cracks. This
analysis dives into their wealth growth, power dimensions, and geopolitical
impacts.
1. House of Saud (Saudi Arabia)
Wealth Growth (1990–2025)
- Estimated
Wealth: $112 billion to $1.4 trillion (2024–2025), encompassing over
15,000 family members and state-controlled assets like Saudi Aramco ($2
trillion valuation post-2019 IPO) and the Public Investment Fund (PIF,
$700 billion).
- Sources:
- Oil:
Saudi Arabia’s 17% of global oil reserves fuels Aramco, which reported
$159 billion in profits (2022).
- Diversification:
Vision 2030, launched by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) in 2016,
funnels billions into NEOM ($500 billion), tech (e.g., $3.5 billion Uber
stake), and sports (e.g., LIV Golf, Newcastle United).
- Royal
Patronage: Stipends via the Royal Diwan and government contracts keep
wealth flowing to princes.
- Growth
Over 35 Years:
- In
1990, oil was king, but price crashes (e.g., 1998’s $10/barrel) squeezed
revenues. The 2000s oil boom ($147/barrel in 2008) rebuilt fortunes.
- MBS’s
2017 anti-corruption purge (e.g., detaining princes at the Ritz-Carlton,
extracting $100 billion) consolidated wealth under his control.
- PIF
assets soared from $360 billion (2015) to $700 billion (2023), reflecting
global investment savvy.
- Anecdote:
In 2018, MBS’s $500 million yacht purchase (Serene) raised eyebrows while
he preached austerity. “It’s like a king preaching water but sipping
champagne,” quipped a Western diplomat anonymously.
Dimensions of Power
- Economic:
Control of OPEC’s oil supply decisions swings global markets. “Saudi
Arabia can make or break economies with a single production cut,” notes
energy analyst Ellen Wald.
- Political:
Absolute monarchy, backed by Wahhabi clerics, ensures domestic control.
MBS’s reforms (e.g., women driving, 2018) mask centralized power.
- Military:
$75 billion in defense spending (2023) and U.S. arms deals ($110 billion,
2017) project regional dominance.
- Cultural/Ideological:
Funding global Wahhabi institutions shapes Islamic discourse, though
cinema openings (2018) signal modernization.
- Diplomatic:
Mediating Iran-Saudi ties (2023) shows pragmatic flexibility, balancing
U.S. and Chinese interests.
- Soft
Power: Sports investments (e.g., $2 billion LIV Golf) and cultural
festivals (e.g., Riyadh Season) polish Saudi’s image.
Geopolitical Impacts and Leverage
- 2011
Arab Spring Response:
- Leverage:
Oil wealth and GCC military alliances. Saudi Arabia deployed troops to
Bahrain under the Peninsula Shield force, spending $10 billion to
stabilize the Al Khalifa monarchy against Shi’a protests. “The Saudis saw
Bahrain as a firewall against Iran,” says Gulf expert Kristin Diwan.
- Impact:
Preserved GCC monarchies but deepened Sunni-Shi’a tensions. Domestically,
$130 billion in handouts quelled unrest, showcasing wealth as a stability
tool.
- Yemen
War (2015–Present):
- Leverage:
Military might and U.S. support. MBS’s $200 billion campaign targeted
Houthi rebels, using F-15 jets and U.S.-supplied munitions. “It’s a war
of ego as much as strategy,” observes Yemen analyst Farea al-Muslimi.
- Impact:
Prolonged conflict, humanitarian crisis (250,000 deaths), and strained
U.S. ties due to human rights concerns, yet solidified Saudi’s anti-Iran
stance.
- 2017
Qatar Blockade:
- Leverage:
Economic sanctions and regional alliances. Saudi Arabia, with UAE, cut
Qatar’s trade routes, demanding Al Jazeera’s closure and reduced Iran
ties. “It was a power play to discipline a rogue neighbor,” says
political scientist Mehran Kamrava.
- Impact:
Failed to subdue Qatar, strengthening its Turkey-Iran axis, but exposed
Saudi’s regional clout limits.
- Iran-Saudi
Reconciliation (2023):
- Leverage:
Chinese mediation and oil diplomacy. Saudi Arabia’s willingness to
negotiate with Iran, facilitated by China, de-escalated tensions. “MBS
saw China as a neutral broker to hedge U.S. unreliability,” notes
diplomat Chas Freeman.
- Impact:
Reduced Gulf proxy wars, reshaping Middle East alliances.
Balancing Global Relationships
- U.S.:
Arms deals and oil trade cement ties, but human rights critiques (e.g.,
Khashoggi murder) strain relations. “The U.S. needs Saudi oil, but the
moral cost is steep,” says analyst Bruce Riedel.
- China:
$65 billion in Belt and Road investments (2017–2023) and oil exports
balance U.S. dependency. “China’s no-strings cash is a Saudi lifeline,”
observes economist Brad Setser.
- EU:
Energy exports and PIF investments (e.g., European tech firms) maintain
influence, though EU sanctions on human rights irk Riyadh.
- Russia:
OPEC+ coordination (2016–present) aligns interests, but Syria and Yemen
rivalries create friction. “It’s a marriage of convenience,” says energy
expert Cyril Widdershoven.
- India:
$100 billion investment pledges (2019) and 3.4 million Indian expatriates
in Saudi Arabia strengthen ties. “India’s a growing market for Saudi
ambitions,” notes diplomat Navdeep Suri.
Critical Perspective
- Wealth
Inequality: The House of Saud’s opulence—private jets,
palaces—contrasts with 20% poverty rates among Saudis. “Princes live like
gods while citizens scrape by,” quips economist Karen Young.
- Authoritarianism:
MBS’s purge of rivals (e.g., 2017 detentions) and Khashoggi’s 2018 murder
expose ruthless control. “It’s a velvet glove hiding an iron fist,” says
Human Rights Watch’s Sarah Leah Whitson.
- Environmental
Hypocrisy: Vision 2030’s green rhetoric clashes with Aramco’s
emissions. “They’re selling solar dreams while pumping oil,” mocks climate
analyst Amy Myers Jaffe.
- Regional
Instability: The Yemen war and Qatar blockade fueled chaos,
prioritizing family dominance over Gulf unity. “MBS plays chess with human
lives,” says journalist Jamal Khashoggi (pre-2018).
2. House of Nahyan (Abu Dhabi, UAE)
Wealth Growth (1990–2025)
- Estimated
Wealth: $150–$323.9 billion, potentially the world’s richest family.
- Sources:
- Oil:
Abu Dhabi’s 6% of global oil reserves drives revenue.
- Sovereign
Wealth: ADIA ($800 billion) and Mubadala ($300 billion) own stakes in
Barclays, Volkswagen, and Manchester City FC.
- Diversification:
Real estate (Canary Wharf), tourism (Louvre Abu Dhabi), and tech (e.g.,
AI investments) fuel growth.
- Growth
Over 35 Years:
- In
1990, oil dominated, but Sheikh Zayed’s vision laid diversification
groundwork. Post-2004, MBZ expanded ADIA’s global reach.
- ADIA
assets grew from $250 billion (2000) to $800 billion (2023), with
Mubadala adding $300 billion.
- Anecdote:
MBZ’s $450 million purchase of Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvator Mundi
(2017) for Louvre Abu Dhabi was a flex. “It’s not just art; it’s a
geopolitical statement,” chuckled a Sotheby’s insider.
Dimensions of Power
- Economic:
ADIA’s investments shape global markets. “The UAE buys influence one stock
at a time,” says financier David Rubenstein.
- Political:
MBZ’s centralized rule over Abu Dhabi and the UAE presidency ensures
control. “MBZ is the Gulf’s Machiavelli,” notes diplomat Anwar Gargash.
- Military:
$23 billion in defense (2023) and F-35 deals with the U.S. project power.
- Cultural:
Louvre Abu Dhabi and Manchester City FC amplify soft power.
- Diplomatic:
Mediation in Sudan and Yemen showcases neutrality. “The UAE punches above
its weight,” says analyst Samantha Gross.
- Technological:
Investments in AI and renewables position the UAE as a future hub.
Geopolitical Impacts and Leverage
- 2011
Bahrain Intervention:
- Leverage:
Military coordination with Saudi Arabia and GCC ties. UAE police forces
stabilized Bahrain’s monarchy. “It was a loyalty pact to the Saudi big
brother,” says analyst Michael Stephens.
- Impact:
Reinforced GCC monarchies, countering Iran’s influence.
- 2017
Qatar Blockade:
- Leverage:
Economic sanctions and media campaigns. MBZ’s rivalry with Qatar’s Al
Thani family drove the blockade, targeting Al Jazeera and Iran ties. “The
UAE wanted to clip Qatar’s wings,” notes scholar Andreas Krieg.
- Impact:
Strengthened Qatar’s resilience but solidified UAE-Saudi alignment.
- Yemen
War:
- Leverage:
Air forces and proxy militias. The UAE focused on southern Yemen,
securing Aden and maritime routes. “MBZ played a smarter game than MBS,”
says analyst Elisabeth Kendall.
- Impact:
Enhanced UAE’s regional clout but drew human rights criticism.
- COP28
(2023):
- Leverage:
Wealth and global branding. Hosting COP28, led by ADNOC’s Sultan Al
Jaber, projected green credentials despite oil reliance. “It’s ironic but
effective,” says climate diplomat Christiana Figueres.
- Impact:
Positioned UAE as a climate player, boosting MBZ’s global stature.
Balancing Global Relationships
- U.S.:
Arms deals (e.g., $23 billion F-35 sale, 2020) and intelligence sharing
bind ties, but Yemen criticism strains relations. “The UAE is America’s
indispensable Gulf ally,” says Pentagon official Mara Karlin.
- China:
$30 billion in trade (2023) and Belt and Road projects align interests.
“China’s cash flows freely in Dubai,” notes economist Alicia
Garcia-Herrero.
- EU:
Trade agreements and cultural projects (e.g., Louvre) deepen ties, though
human rights concerns linger.
- Russia:
Neutral stance on Ukraine and energy coordination balance relations. “The
UAE plays both sides deftly,” says analyst Anna Borshchevskaya.
- India:
$75 billion investment pledges (2020) and 3.5 million Indian expatriates
strengthen ties. “India’s a strategic partner for UAE’s global ambitions,”
says diplomat T.P. Seetharam.
Critical Perspective
- Inequality:
Palaces and yacht fleets contrast with migrant worker exploitation. “The
UAE’s skyscrapers are built on sweat,” says activist Migrant-Rights.org.
- Authoritarianism:
Surveillance and dissent crackdowns (e.g., Ahmed Mansoor’s 2017 arrest)
expose MBZ’s iron grip. “It’s a police state with a Gucci veneer,” quips
Amnesty’s Rasha Abdul Rahim.
- Environmental
Contradictions: Green initiatives like Masdar clash with ADNOC’s oil
expansion. “They’re planting trees while drilling deeper,” mocks analyst
Jonathan Piron.
- Regional
Rivalries: The Qatar blockade fueled Gulf disunity. “MBZ’s vendetta
cost the GCC its cohesion,” says scholar Cinzia Bianco.
3. Al Sabah Family (Kuwait)
Wealth Growth (1990–2025)
- Estimated
Wealth: $360 billion, tied to state-controlled oil and investments.
- Sources:
- Oil:
Kuwait’s 7% of global reserves drives revenue via Kuwait Petroleum
Corporation.
- Sovereign
Wealth: The Kuwait Investment Authority (KIA, $700 billion) owns
stakes in Citigroup, Mercedes-Benz, and BlackRock.
- Growth
Over 35 Years:
- The
1990 Gulf War devastated Kuwait, but post-war oil revenues rebuilt
wealth. KIA assets grew from $200 billion (2000) to $700 billion (2023).
- Conservative
investments ensured stability, unlike the UAE’s aggressive approach.
- Anecdote:
Sheikh Ahmad Al-Fahad’s $1 billion London property portfolio (2020)
sparked gossip. “He buys Mayfair like it’s Monopoly,” joked a Kuwaiti
expat.
Dimensions of Power
- Economic:
KIA’s investments wield global influence. “Kuwait’s wealth is quiet but
pervasive,” says financier Stephen Schwarzman.
- Political:
Control of key ministries balances parliamentary democracy. “The Al Sabah
family is the glue of Kuwait’s system,” notes scholar Maryam Al-Sekari.
- Diplomatic:
Neutral mediation (e.g., Qatar blockade) enhances soft power.
- Cultural:
Limited compared to UAE/Qatar, but heritage projects (e.g., Sheikh Jaber
Cultural Centre) exist.
- Military:
Modest ($7 billion, 2023) but reliant on U.S. protection.
Geopolitical Impacts and Leverage
- Gulf
War (1990–1991):
- Leverage:
Oil wealth and U.S. alliances. The Al Sabah family lobbied for Operation
Desert Storm, funding resistance from exile. “Kuwait’s checkbook
diplomacy won the war,” says historian Phebe Marr.
- Impact:
Restored their rule, cementing U.S.-Kuwait ties.
- 2017
Qatar Blockade Mediation:
- Leverage:
Neutrality and GCC membership. Kuwait hosted talks, using its non-aligned
stance. “Kuwait’s the Gulf’s Switzerland,” says diplomat Ghanim Alnajjar.
- Impact:
Mitigated escalation but couldn’t end the blockade, highlighting limited
influence.
- 2011
Corruption Scandal:
- Leverage:
Political patronage. Alleged bribes ($350 million) to MPs showed the
family’s domestic control. “Money buys loyalty in Kuwait,” says analyst
Ghanem Alnajjar.
- Impact:
Reinforced Al Sabah dominance but fueled public discontent.
Balancing Global Relationships
- U.S.:
Military bases (e.g., Camp Arifjan) and oil exports ensure tight ties.
“Kuwait’s a loyal U.S. client,” says General David Petraeus.
- China:
$10 billion in trade (2023) and Belt and Road projects grow ties. “China
sees Kuwait as a stable partner,” notes analyst Li-Chen Sim.
- EU:
Energy exports and KIA investments maintain influence, though less
prominent than UAE.
- Russia:
Neutral on Ukraine, with OPEC+ alignment. “Kuwait treads carefully with
Moscow,” says scholar Nikolay Kozhanov.
- India:
1 million Indian expatriates and $5 billion trade (2023) strengthen ties.
“India’s labor fuels Kuwait’s economy,” says diplomat Sunjay Sudhir.
Critical Perspective
- Inequality:
Royal wealth dwarfs citizen welfare. “The Al Sabah family lives in a
bubble,” says activist Anwar Al-Rasheed.
- Stagnation:
Slow diversification risks oil dependency. “Kuwait’s stuck in the 1990s,”
quips economist Steffen Hertog.
- Corruption:
Bribery scandals erode trust. “The family buys loyalty, not love,” notes
journalist Meshal Al-Sabah.
- Limited
Ambition: Kuwait’s neutrality limits its global footprint. “They’re
content being the Gulf’s wallflower,” says analyst Kristin Smith Diwan.
4. Al Thani Family (Qatar)
Wealth Growth (1990–2025)
- Estimated
Wealth: $133–$335 billion, driven by gas and investments.
- Sources:
- Natural
Gas: The North Field (third-largest globally) powers Qatar’s economy.
- Sovereign
Wealth: QIA ($450 billion) owns stakes in Volkswagen, Harrods, and
PSG.
- Cultural:
Al Jazeera and Museum of Islamic Art enhance global profile.
- Growth
Over 35 Years:
- Sheikh
Hamad’s 1995 coup accelerated gas exports. QIA’s growth from $50 billion
(2005) to $450 billion (2023) reflects diversification.
- The
2022 World Cup ($200 billion) boosted visibility.
- Anecdote:
The Al Thanis’ $300 million London penthouse purchase (2021) sparked
memes. “They own half of Mayfair—call it Qatarville,” laughed a Doha
cabbie.
Dimensions of Power
- Economic:
QIA and gas exports wield global clout. “Qatar’s wallet is its
superpower,” says economist Jim Krane.
- Political:
Centralized rule under Sheikh Tamim ensures stability. “The Al Thanis run
a tight ship,” notes scholar Allen Fromherz.
- Cultural:
Al Jazeera shapes global narratives. “It’s Qatar’s megaphone,” says media
analyst Claire Spencer.
- Diplomatic:
Mediation in Afghanistan and Gaza projects neutrality.
- Sporting:
The 2022 World Cup and PSG ownership amplify soft power.
- Technological:
Investments in AI and fintech position Qatar for the future.
Geopolitical Impacts and Leverage
- 2017–2021
Qatar Blockade:
- Leverage:
Gas wealth and diplomatic ties. Qatar used QIA funds to build new ports
and farms, aligning with Turkey and Iran. “Qatar turned sanctions into
strength,” says scholar Mahjoob Zweiri.
- Impact:
Enhanced Qatar’s resilience and global profile.
- Afghanistan
Mediation (2020–2021):
- Leverage:
Neutrality and wealth. Doha hosted U.S.-Taliban talks, funded by Al Thani
resources. “Qatar’s the Gulf’s diplomatic hub,” says envoy Zalmay
Khalilzad.
- Impact:
Shaped U.S. withdrawal, elevating Qatar’s stature.
- 2022
FIFA World Cup:
- Leverage:
$200 billion investment. The event showcased Qatar’s ambition despite
labor rights criticism. “It was a gamble that paid off,” says FIFA’s
Gianni Infantino.
- Impact:
Amplified soft power, though human rights scrutiny persists.
Balancing Global Relationships
- U.S.:
Al Udeid airbase and $185 billion trade (2023) bind ties. “Qatar’s a key
U.S. ally,” says General Kenneth McKenzie.
- China:
$26 billion trade (2023) and gas deals grow ties. “China’s a pragmatic
partner for Qatar,” says analyst Justin Gengler.
- EU:
Gas exports post-Ukraine war (2022) strengthen ties. “Qatar’s Europe’s
energy lifeline,” says EU diplomat Josep Borrell.
- Russia:
Neutral stance and gas market coordination balance relations.
- India:
600,000 Indian expatriates and $15 billion trade (2023) deepen ties.
“India’s a growth market for Qatar,” says diplomat Pavan Kapoor.
Critical Perspective
- Inequality:
Migrant workers’ plight (e.g., World Cup labor deaths) stains Qatar’s
image. “Glittering stadiums hide grim realities,” says Amnesty’s May
Romanos.
- Media
Manipulation: Al Jazeera’s bias accusations (e.g., Muslim Brotherhood
support) spark controversy. “It’s propaganda with a press pass,” quips
analyst Joseph Kechichian.
- Risky
Diplomacy: Ties with Iran and Turkey alienated Saudi Arabia. “Qatar’s
playing with fire,” says scholar Madawi Al-Rasheed.
- Sustainability:
Gas reliance risks obsolescence. “Qatar’s betting big, but the clock’s
ticking,” notes economist Rory Fyfe.
Comparative Analysis
- Wealth:
The House of Saud’s vast but diffuse wealth contrasts with the Al Nahyan’s
concentrated financial empire. The Al Sabah’s conservative approach lags
behind the Al Thani’s bold investments.
- Power:
Saudi Arabia’s oil and military dominance overshadows the UAE’s financial
and cultural clout, Qatar’s diplomatic agility, and Kuwait’s quiet
stability.
- Geopolitical
Leverage: All use energy and wealth, but Saudi Arabia and UAE rely on
military might, Qatar on diplomacy, and Kuwait on neutrality.
- Global
Balancing: All hedge U.S.-China ties, with the UAE and Qatar most
adept at multi-alignment. India’s growing economic and expatriate ties
make it a key partner.
Conclusions
The House of Saud, Al Nahyan, Al Sabah, and Al Thani have
transformed oil and gas wealth into global influence, leveraging energy
markets, sovereign wealth funds, and diplomacy to shape geopolitics. Over 35
years, their wealth has skyrocketed—Saudi Aramco’s IPO, ADIA’s $800 billion
portfolio, QIA’s $450 billion, and KIA’s $700 billion reflect strategic
diversification. Geopolitically, they’ve driven outcomes like the Yemen war,
Qatar blockade, and Afghanistan mediation, using economic coercion, military
power, and soft power (e.g., World Cup, COP28). Their ability to balance U.S.,
China, EU, Russia, and India hinges on energy exports, investments, and
neutrality, though rivalries (e.g., Saudi-UAE vs. Qatar) expose limits. Critics
highlight inequality, authoritarianism, and environmental hypocrisy,
questioning the sustainability of their models. In a world shifting to
renewables and multipolarity, these families must adapt to maintain influence,
or risk becoming relics of a petro-powered era. Their gilded thrones, built on
oil and ambition, face an uncertain future.
Reflections
What does it mean to wield power when your throne is built
on black gold, a finite elixir in a world craving green salvation? The House of
Saud, Al Nahyan, Al Sabah, and Al Thani embody a paradox: monarchs of
modernity, yet tethered to an ancient resource. Their wealth—billions stacked
like digital dunes—offers a Faustian bargain. They buy influence, stadiums, and
skyscrapers, but can they buy permanence? Their power, a tapestry of oil, arms,
and diplomacy, weaves a fragile empire. As Plato warned, unchecked power breeds
hubris, and these families’ lavish palaces and global gambits flirt with that
sin. MBS’s yacht, MBZ’s da Vinci, the Al Thanis’ World Cup—they’re symbols of
ambition, but also vanity, masking the sweat of migrant workers and the cries
of Yemen’s war-torn.
Existentially, their reign raises questions of legitimacy.
Wealth buys loyalty, but not love, as Kuwait’s scandals and Qatar’s blockade
defiance show. Their balancing act—courting Washington’s might, Beijing’s cash,
Delhi’s markets—reflects Nietzsche’s will to power, a pragmatic dance to
survive a multipolar world. Yet, their authoritarian grip clashes with a global
zeitgeist demanding accountability. “Power tends to corrupt,” warned Lord
Acton, and the Khashoggi murder, UAE’s surveillance, and Qatar’s labor woes
prove it. Their soft power—Al Jazeera’s voice, Saudi’s LIV Golf, UAE’s
Louvre—masks these sins, but the mask is thin.
Environmentally, they’re a paradox wrapped in irony.
Preaching green futures while pumping oil, they’re like Sisyphus pushing a
boulder of contradictions uphill. The UAE’s Masdar and Saudi’s NEOM promise
sustainability, but can you greenwash a petrostate? In a Heideggerian sense,
their “being-in-the-world” is tied to a resource that’s fading, forcing a
reckoning with authenticity. Will they evolve into stewards of a new era, or
cling to fading glory?
Ultimately, their power is a microcosm of humanity’s
struggle: to wield influence without losing soul. They shape geopolitics, but
geopolitics shapes them back. As the world pivots to renewables and
multipolarity, their challenge is existential: adapt or fade. Their thrones,
glittering yet precarious, remind us that power, like oil, is finite—unless
tempered with wisdom.
References
- Wald,
E. (2023). Saudi, Inc.. Pegasus Books.
- Diwan,
K. S. (2021). Gulf Monarchies and the Arab Spring. Brookings
Institution.
- Al-Muslimi,
F. (2022). Yemen’s Tragedy. Sana’a Center for Strategic Studies.
- Kamrava,
M. (2018). Qatar: Small State, Big Politics. Cornell University
Press.
- Freeman,
C. (2023). Interview on Iran-Saudi deal, Al-Monitor.
- Riedel,
B. (2019). Kings and Presidents. Brookings Institution Press.
- Setser,
B. (2023). Council on Foreign Relations Report.
- Widdershoven,
C. (2022). OPEC+ Dynamics. Energy Post.
- Suri,
N. (2020). India-Saudi Relations Brief, Indian Ministry of External
Affairs.
- Young,
K. (2021). The Gulf’s Economic Pivot. AEI.
- Whitson,
S. L. (2018). Human Rights Watch Report on Saudi Arabia.
- Jaffe,
A. M. (2023). Energy Transition Challenges. Columbia University.
- Rubenstein,
D. (2022). How to Invest. Simon & Schuster.
- Gargash,
A. (2021). UAE Foreign Policy Speech, Emirates Diplomatic Academy.
- Gross,
S. (2023). UAE’s Global Role. Brookings Institution.
- Krieg,
A. (2019). Divided Gulf. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kendall,
E. (2020). Yemen’s Southern Question. Chatham House.
- Figueres,
C. (2023). COP28 Press Conference, UNFCCC.
- Karlin,
M. (2021). Pentagon Brief on UAE, U.S. Department of Defense.
- Garcia-Herrero,
A. (2023). China’s Gulf Investments. Bruegel.
- Borshchevskaya,
A. (2022). Russia and the Gulf. Washington Institute.
- Seetharam,
T.P. (2020). India-UAE Relations, Indian Embassy in UAE.
- Migrant-Rights.org
(2023). UAE Labor Report.
- Abdul
Rahim, R. (2021). Amnesty International UAE Report.
- Piron,
J. (2023). Gulf Energy Transition. E3G.
- Bianco,
C. (2022). Gulf Rivalries. European Council on Foreign Relations.
- Marr,
P. (1995). The Modern History of Iraq. Westview Press.
- Alnajjar,
G. (2018). Kuwait’s Mediation Role. Kuwait University.
- Al-Sekari,
M. (2021). Kuwait’s Political System. Gulf Studies Center.
- Schwarzman,
S. (2020). What It Takes. Simon & Schuster.
- Al-Rasheed,
A. (2023). Kuwait’s Economic Challenges. LSE Middle East Centre.
- Hertog,
S. (2022). Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats. Cornell University
Press.
- Al-Sabah,
M. (2021). Kuwait’s Political Landscape. Al-Sabah Press.
- Fromherz,
A. (2012). Qatar: A Modern History. I.B. Tauris.
- Spencer,
C. (2023). Al Jazeera’s Global Impact. Chatham House.
- Khalilzad,
Z. (2021). The Envoy. St. Martin’s Press.
- Infantino,
G. (2022). FIFA World Cup Press Conference.
- Zweiri,
M. (2021). Qatar’s Blockade Resilience. Gulf Studies Forum.
- Kechichian,
J. (2019). Power and Succession in Arab Monarchies. Lynne Rienner.
- Romanos,
M. (2022). Amnesty International Qatar Report.
- Fyfe,
R. (2023). Qatar’s Economic Future. Oxford Economics.
- Gengler,
J. (2023). Qatar’s Foreign Policy. Carnegie Endowment.
- McKenzie,
K. (2022). U.S. Central Command Brief.
- Borrell,
J. (2023). EU-Qatar Energy Talks, European Commission.
- Kapoor,
P. (2021). India-Qatar Relations, Indian Embassy in Qatar.
Comments
Post a Comment